21.04.2016 Views

Aboriginal Waterways Assessment program

dCckIF

dCckIF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The research methodology<br />

<strong>Aboriginal</strong> <strong>Waterways</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> — Part B The <strong>program</strong> 17<br />

PART B<br />

This section describes the research<br />

method and resulting research<br />

strategy used to explore whether<br />

a Cultural Health Index for cultural<br />

assessment of rivers and wetlands<br />

in the Murray–Darling Basin was<br />

possible — and if so, what it would<br />

look like and how it would work.<br />

How to protect cultural<br />

knowledge: consent protocols<br />

in research practice<br />

The MDBA’s <strong>Aboriginal</strong> engagement<br />

principles guided the research team’s<br />

activities. These require that people’s<br />

‘free, prior and informed consent’ be<br />

confirmed before proceeding with<br />

the strategy. This is consistent with<br />

the Australian Institute of <strong>Aboriginal</strong><br />

and Torres Strait Islander Studies’<br />

recommendations for good practice<br />

research with <strong>Aboriginal</strong> communities<br />

(AIATSIS, 2012).<br />

NBAN and MLDRIN have longestablished<br />

community networks<br />

and working relationships with the<br />

<strong>Aboriginal</strong> Partnerships team of the<br />

MDBA (as well as other aspects of<br />

the MDBA’s operations). These<br />

sustained relationships enable<br />

initiatives such as the AWA<br />

research strategy to continually build<br />

on an established history of respect<br />

and trust, as well as increasing crosscultural<br />

understanding of how to work<br />

well together.<br />

All <strong>Aboriginal</strong> participation in this<br />

pilot <strong>program</strong> was funded by the<br />

MDBA. This was in recognition of<br />

the level of risk associated with<br />

unsure outcomes and no guarantee of<br />

benefits for the participants or their<br />

Nations. There is no obligation on<br />

any party to continue funding in the<br />

rollout of the AWA.<br />

The MDBA ensured that the placespecific<br />

assessment reports and the<br />

data on which they are based remain<br />

the intellectual property of each<br />

Nation. This practice of recognising<br />

<strong>Aboriginal</strong> intellectual property will<br />

continue for the rollout of the AWA.<br />

Staged introduction<br />

The staged approach to introducing<br />

the project began with MLDRIN<br />

and NBAN delegates visiting New<br />

Zealand in 2013, and learning from<br />

Māori researchers and community<br />

members about how cultural<br />

assessment of rivers and wetlands<br />

was developed in their Country. This<br />

was followed by presentations and<br />

deliberations at MLDRIN and NBAN<br />

delegates’ meetings in early 2014.<br />

The deliberations authorised the<br />

research strategy, and were part and<br />

parcel of the way in which the inquiry<br />

was grounded in cultural and local<br />

legitimacy.<br />

Once MLDRIN, NBAN and the MDBA<br />

gave authority to proceed, the<br />

principles of ‘free, prior and informed<br />

consent’ were carried out at carefullytimed<br />

local meetings. These were held<br />

with <strong>Aboriginal</strong> leadership at potential<br />

pilot places, which had been put<br />

forward by MLDRIN and NBAN.<br />

At the meetings participants<br />

considered the purpose of the<br />

research, how it would be done, and<br />

what the potential consequences of<br />

engaging Traditional Owners in cultural<br />

assessments of rivers and wetlands<br />

would be for a specific Nation.<br />

Months elapsed between the<br />

meetings, (interspersed with many<br />

informal conversations), to allow local<br />

communities to make an informed<br />

decision before progressing to the<br />

next stage of information delivery.<br />

Once the decision to proceed was made,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!