Aboriginal Waterways Assessment program

Recommendations

Info

32 Aboriginal Waterways Assessment — Part B The program in good condition what use could an Aboriginal person make of it?’ The research team therefore decided that the best AWA question for this part of the form is, ‘What cultural uses does this place have now?’ The assessment can be applied to a small place or a much larger area After visiting half a dozen places in the Werai Forest, the assessments showed little difference between many of the places — they were all in poor condition. In situations like this, both the assessment and research teams thought the assessment process could be used at a ‘landscape scale’, and not only at a local place level. That is, in situations where the landscape functions are biophysically the same and all parts of a landscape have been subject to the same history and conditions. Finding 17 The results are an assessment of contemporary use, acknowledging that history and past practices influence how a place is used. Finding 18 Where there are large-scale environmental influences on the waterway, the assessment process works at both local and landscape scales of Country. Ronald Hughes Dhudhuroa Nation, Luke Gardiner Waywurru Nation preparing a farewell ceremony in the Victorian Alps (photo by Ross Colliver). Finding 19 In undertaking the assessment process there is potential to gather local intelligence about policy and regulatory impacts on environmental health and Nations.
Aboriginal Waterways Assessment — Part B The program 33 PART B Research question 2 Is the assessment form useful for communities? Returning to the three guiding research questions (as opposed to the AWA assessment questions) the criterion of appropriateness explores whether the assessment form enables communities to make decisions on their priorities or to influence water planners and other government agencies to improve the health of their Country. While understanding about these matters may only become apparent in the medium-term, the research team asked about possible usefulness based on the week’s experience of the assessment form. What is needed next in your community with regard to the health of rivers and wetlands? The research found that it is strongly advisable to bring Elders into the assessment process. In Deniliquin, the assessment team realised that Elders who hadn’t been able to join the team had deep and valuable knowledge of some of the places. The Deniliquin team now wants to take those people out to places already assessed, and get their input. This would test the assessment just made, and deepen understanding of the cultural significance of each place. Finding 20 Local communities will determine the best way to carry out and use the assessment process to get the best results for their people without compromising the AWA tools and results. Little Rushy Swamp, Barmah Forest, Victoria (photo by Keith Ward, Goulburn-Broken Catchment Management Authority)
Page 1 and 2: Aboriginal Waterways Assessment —
Page 3 and 4: Aboriginal Waterways Assessment Con
Page 5 and 6: Explanation of the terms and langua
Page 11 and 12: Purpose and background Aboriginal W
Page 17 and 18: The research methodology Aboriginal
Page 25 and 26: Lessons learned - how the Cultural
Page 31: Aboriginal Waterways Assessment —
Page 43 and 44: Aboriginal Waterways Assessment - P
Page 47 and 48: Conclusions Aboriginal Waterways As
Page 53 and 54: Aboriginal Waterways Assessment - P
Page 59 and 60: PART C In northern Australia, Abori
Page 71 and 72: References Aboriginal Waterways Ass
Page 75: Published by the Murray-Darling Bas

Aboriginal Waterways Assessment program

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?