21.04.2016 Views

Aboriginal Waterways Assessment program

dCckIF

dCckIF

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Aboriginal</strong> <strong>Waterways</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> — Part B The <strong>program</strong> 35<br />

PART B<br />

‘Do this again.’<br />

‘Do it again, bring more people …<br />

and have more time out there.’<br />

‘Yeah before we fill out surveys and<br />

that, reconnect to Country. ’<br />

‘Learn what it will take to put it<br />

back together again. ’<br />

‘More sessions with people specific<br />

into other fields as well. Learning<br />

more about the native animals, the<br />

aquatic life and that.’<br />

Learn what is needed to bring<br />

river and wetland places back to<br />

health<br />

Water is the first and most essential<br />

need, but to return to health many<br />

places will need other conservation<br />

activities and support from more than<br />

one government <strong>program</strong>. The close<br />

assessment required by the assessment<br />

form made assessment teams more<br />

aware of the restoration tasks, and<br />

motivated to learn more about this:<br />

‘I’m happy and encouraged seeing<br />

that last place, but there’s still a lot<br />

more we need to see, to see what’s<br />

possible to bring the Country back.’<br />

Teams also saw the need to<br />

work with landholders and water<br />

managers to agree on changes in<br />

use and action to rehabilitate rivers<br />

and wetlands. The Deniliquin and<br />

Walgett assessment teams were less<br />

optimistic than the Alps team about<br />

what this might deliver.<br />

Will the assessment process give<br />

the community a way to make the<br />

case for their priorities?<br />

Among all assessment teams there<br />

was a general concern that water<br />

planners aren’t listening to<br />

<strong>Aboriginal</strong> people. To some extent<br />

this fuelled doubt that water<br />

planners would accept the<br />

assessments as valid science.<br />

‘I don’t see they’re listening to<br />

anyone, those water authorities.<br />

They’ve got their little bit of science,<br />

where if they went and had a look<br />

on the ground, they’d see that their<br />

practices aren’t working, they’re<br />

not. They killed a heap of fish not<br />

long ago with black water, and<br />

they thought they knew what they<br />

were doing. It’s just getting worse<br />

and worse, and it won’t be able to<br />

recover soon.’<br />

Finding 24<br />

The assessment process can<br />

increase the health of a river<br />

system through Traditional<br />

Owners’ knowledge and values<br />

being recognised and implemented.<br />

Axe grinding grooves on the<br />

Macquarie (Wambool) River<br />

near Dubbo, New South Wales<br />

(photo by Denise Fowler, MDBA)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!