CONTENTS
POLITICS-FIRST-SEPT-OCT-2016-FINAL
POLITICS-FIRST-SEPT-OCT-2016-FINAL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
politics first | Corridors<br />
A railway system with its<br />
passengers at its heart<br />
Andy McDonald, Shadow Secretary of State for Transport and Labour<br />
MP for Middlesbrough<br />
Labour’s promise to bring the railways back into public<br />
ownership is popular with the general public, with<br />
poll after poll demonstrating that around two thirds<br />
of the population support the idea. It is not difficult to<br />
understand the high levels of public support for ending<br />
the dysfunctional model of privatised rail.<br />
56<br />
Quite simply, the privatisation of British<br />
Rail was a rushed, botched job which had<br />
more to do with ideology than any clear plan<br />
for the railways, and the consequences were,<br />
quite literally, disastrous, resulting in a series<br />
of fatal accidents.<br />
The last Labour Government cleaned up<br />
much of this mess at a cost of several billion<br />
pounds and delivered the safest railway<br />
in Europe. We also invested more in the<br />
railways, in real terms, than any previous<br />
Government and won back public trust in<br />
the railways – the foundation on which<br />
all subsequent investment has been built.<br />
But many of the other problems caused<br />
by privatisation remained and continue to<br />
plague commuters and taxpayers, alike.<br />
Millions of us rely on the railways to get<br />
into work every morning, but, alongside<br />
the continual ratchet upwards in fares, too<br />
many privatised rail companies have failed<br />
to deliver the service passengers demand.<br />
Southern Rail, in recent months, has been<br />
a particular disgrace, with both passengers<br />
and workers suffering at the hands of its<br />
incompetent management.<br />
The network of private and foreign stateowned<br />
companies which operate passenger<br />
services on Britain’s railways come together<br />
in a confused, inefficient and jumbled network<br />
that drives up the cost of improvement works,<br />
complicates ticketing structures and extracts<br />
eye-watering profits that could, instead, go<br />
on improvements or keeping fares down.<br />
The hit to the pockets of commuters stands<br />
in stark contrast to the £222 million in<br />
dividends paid to shareholders of private<br />
train companies in the last year – an increase<br />
of 21 per cent.<br />
Britain is already the most expensive<br />
country in Europe to travel by train in, with<br />
rail fares haven risen by 25 per cent in the<br />
last six years alone. And rail fares are not<br />
just expensive – they are confusing, too,<br />
often leaving passengers overpaying for their<br />
journey and struggling to claim refunds they<br />
are entitled to. As the Government are finding<br />
out, it is proving far too difficult to make<br />
basic changes to fares and ticketing under<br />
our fragmented system.<br />
Bringing the railways back in house as the<br />
franchises expire is a cost-effective means to<br />
take our transport system out of the hands of<br />
the privateers and back under proper public<br />
control. And it is effective: the East Coast<br />
Mainline, placed in state ownership after<br />
private operator National Express walked<br />
away from the contract, rapidly established<br />
a reputation as the best of our rail service<br />
operators, delivering over £1 billion to<br />
the Treasury, keeping fares down, holding<br />
record passenger satisfaction and engaged<br />
the workforce with unparalleled success.<br />
It is baffling that the Tories did not take the<br />
opportunity to build on that success; instead,<br />
they pushed East Coast back out to private<br />
operator Virgin. The success of East Coast<br />
Mainline demonstrates a clear alternative to<br />
the dysfunctional model of privatisation and,<br />
as with the ongoing Southern Rail debacle,<br />
shows a government clinging to a failed<br />
model for purely ideological reasons – and<br />
it is commuters who are being made to pay<br />
the price.<br />
It is no surprise that the common sense<br />
call to bring the railways back into public<br />
ownership, as pledged by Jeremy Corbyn,<br />
remains popular with the electorate. We know<br />
that reliable, modern, affordable transport is<br />
essential to delivering productivity growth.<br />
Trimming the fat of privatisation can unlock<br />
funds to deliver cheaper fares for passengers,<br />
with the TUC showing that the costs saved<br />
from bringing expiring franchises from 2016<br />
to 2020 would save £604 million a year,<br />
enough to lower regulated fares by up to<br />
10 per cent. In addition, ticketing structures<br />
could be more easily simplified and savings<br />
achieved through greater integration.<br />
Our trains should run for the benefit of<br />
passengers and the taxpayer, rather than<br />
private or foreign state-owned companies,<br />
as is presently the case. Labour have been<br />
clear that we will put an end to Britain’s<br />
rip-off railways, bringing rail back to<br />
public ownership, with routes returning<br />
to public ownership as private contracts<br />
expire, meaning profits can be re-invested<br />
to improve services and hold fares down.<br />
Passengers, not profit, should be at the heart<br />
of Britain’s railway.