31.08.2016 Views

CONTENTS

POLITICS-FIRST-SEPT-OCT-2016-FINAL

POLITICS-FIRST-SEPT-OCT-2016-FINAL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

politics first | Corridors<br />

A railway system with its<br />

passengers at its heart<br />

Andy McDonald, Shadow Secretary of State for Transport and Labour<br />

MP for Middlesbrough<br />

Labour’s promise to bring the railways back into public<br />

ownership is popular with the general public, with<br />

poll after poll demonstrating that around two thirds<br />

of the population support the idea. It is not difficult to<br />

understand the high levels of public support for ending<br />

the dysfunctional model of privatised rail.<br />

56<br />

Quite simply, the privatisation of British<br />

Rail was a rushed, botched job which had<br />

more to do with ideology than any clear plan<br />

for the railways, and the consequences were,<br />

quite literally, disastrous, resulting in a series<br />

of fatal accidents.<br />

The last Labour Government cleaned up<br />

much of this mess at a cost of several billion<br />

pounds and delivered the safest railway<br />

in Europe. We also invested more in the<br />

railways, in real terms, than any previous<br />

Government and won back public trust in<br />

the railways – the foundation on which<br />

all subsequent investment has been built.<br />

But many of the other problems caused<br />

by privatisation remained and continue to<br />

plague commuters and taxpayers, alike.<br />

Millions of us rely on the railways to get<br />

into work every morning, but, alongside<br />

the continual ratchet upwards in fares, too<br />

many privatised rail companies have failed<br />

to deliver the service passengers demand.<br />

Southern Rail, in recent months, has been<br />

a particular disgrace, with both passengers<br />

and workers suffering at the hands of its<br />

incompetent management.<br />

The network of private and foreign stateowned<br />

companies which operate passenger<br />

services on Britain’s railways come together<br />

in a confused, inefficient and jumbled network<br />

that drives up the cost of improvement works,<br />

complicates ticketing structures and extracts<br />

eye-watering profits that could, instead, go<br />

on improvements or keeping fares down.<br />

The hit to the pockets of commuters stands<br />

in stark contrast to the £222 million in<br />

dividends paid to shareholders of private<br />

train companies in the last year – an increase<br />

of 21 per cent.<br />

Britain is already the most expensive<br />

country in Europe to travel by train in, with<br />

rail fares haven risen by 25 per cent in the<br />

last six years alone. And rail fares are not<br />

just expensive – they are confusing, too,<br />

often leaving passengers overpaying for their<br />

journey and struggling to claim refunds they<br />

are entitled to. As the Government are finding<br />

out, it is proving far too difficult to make<br />

basic changes to fares and ticketing under<br />

our fragmented system.<br />

Bringing the railways back in house as the<br />

franchises expire is a cost-effective means to<br />

take our transport system out of the hands of<br />

the privateers and back under proper public<br />

control. And it is effective: the East Coast<br />

Mainline, placed in state ownership after<br />

private operator National Express walked<br />

away from the contract, rapidly established<br />

a reputation as the best of our rail service<br />

operators, delivering over £1 billion to<br />

the Treasury, keeping fares down, holding<br />

record passenger satisfaction and engaged<br />

the workforce with unparalleled success.<br />

It is baffling that the Tories did not take the<br />

opportunity to build on that success; instead,<br />

they pushed East Coast back out to private<br />

operator Virgin. The success of East Coast<br />

Mainline demonstrates a clear alternative to<br />

the dysfunctional model of privatisation and,<br />

as with the ongoing Southern Rail debacle,<br />

shows a government clinging to a failed<br />

model for purely ideological reasons – and<br />

it is commuters who are being made to pay<br />

the price.<br />

It is no surprise that the common sense<br />

call to bring the railways back into public<br />

ownership, as pledged by Jeremy Corbyn,<br />

remains popular with the electorate. We know<br />

that reliable, modern, affordable transport is<br />

essential to delivering productivity growth.<br />

Trimming the fat of privatisation can unlock<br />

funds to deliver cheaper fares for passengers,<br />

with the TUC showing that the costs saved<br />

from bringing expiring franchises from 2016<br />

to 2020 would save £604 million a year,<br />

enough to lower regulated fares by up to<br />

10 per cent. In addition, ticketing structures<br />

could be more easily simplified and savings<br />

achieved through greater integration.<br />

Our trains should run for the benefit of<br />

passengers and the taxpayer, rather than<br />

private or foreign state-owned companies,<br />

as is presently the case. Labour have been<br />

clear that we will put an end to Britain’s<br />

rip-off railways, bringing rail back to<br />

public ownership, with routes returning<br />

to public ownership as private contracts<br />

expire, meaning profits can be re-invested<br />

to improve services and hold fares down.<br />

Passengers, not profit, should be at the heart<br />

of Britain’s railway.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!