CONTENTS
POLITICS-FIRST-SEPT-OCT-2016-FINAL
POLITICS-FIRST-SEPT-OCT-2016-FINAL
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
politics first | Corridors<br />
September / October 2016 | www.politicsfirst.org.uk<br />
Preventing avoidable sight loss<br />
will be the focus this autumn<br />
Securing employment opportunities<br />
for deaf people<br />
Lord Colin Low, Co-Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Eye<br />
Health and Visual Impairment and a Crossbench Peer<br />
It is a surprising fact that people are needlessly losing<br />
their sight in today’s NHS. That is not down to the<br />
doctors who are working tirelessly, around the clock, to<br />
save the sight of their patients. It is due to the continued<br />
pressure being placed on the system by rising demand<br />
for services.<br />
Dr Eilidh Whiteford, Scottish National Party Group Leader on<br />
Social Justice and SNP MP for Banff and Buchan<br />
Reducing the disability employment gap is a huge<br />
challenge, so all steps to tackle it are welcome.<br />
Progress, however, will require more than a change<br />
in tone from policymakers. Over the last decade, the<br />
disability employment gap has grown whilst the overall<br />
employment rate has increased. That tells us that<br />
something is going badly wrong.<br />
Financial pressures are also having an impact,<br />
with NHS staff being asked to do ever more with<br />
fewer resources - a formidable challenge!<br />
The impact of sight loss on everyday life can<br />
be enormous. It can prevent people from driving<br />
and can lead to social isolation; it can stop them<br />
from continuing in paid employment and having to<br />
rely on benefits; and it can hamper their ability to<br />
self-administer medications for other conditions.<br />
Currently, there are almost two million people<br />
living with sight loss in the UK and this is set to<br />
double to around four million by 2050. The ageing<br />
population is the main reason for that increase,<br />
as the risk of developing a sight threatening eye<br />
condition increases with age. While that puts<br />
pressure on hospital eye departments, it is not<br />
the only factor. The rapid increase in the number<br />
of new eye treatments that are available is the<br />
other factor. That is a welcome development but<br />
it does mean that even more people are in the<br />
NHS system being treated for sight conditions.<br />
Since 2008, the number of new eye treatments<br />
approved for use on the NHS has outstripped<br />
many other specialties. Previously blinding<br />
conditions - many of which are chronic such<br />
as wet Age-related Macular Degeneration and<br />
Glaucoma - can now be treated. Those patients<br />
need to be monitored and treated regularly, often<br />
at four weekly intervals. That explains why there<br />
has been a 30 per cent increase in demand for<br />
hospital eye care services over the past five<br />
years, and why ophthalmology has the second<br />
highest number of outpatient attendances for any<br />
specialty across the NHS.<br />
So what is the impact of the increased<br />
demand on patient care?<br />
It is clear that the number of follow-up<br />
appointments required to manage chronic<br />
eye conditions is putting a strain on eye<br />
departments across the UK. Recent RNIB<br />
research showed that many return patients<br />
experienced hospital initiated delays to their<br />
appointments. So, for example, a number<br />
of wet AMD and Glaucoma patients were<br />
interviewed for the study and reported that<br />
their appointment was rescheduled (29 per<br />
cent of respondents) or cancelled altogether<br />
(12 per cent of respondents) during a 12<br />
month period.<br />
So do those delays result in needless sight<br />
loss?<br />
Evidence suggests that the answer to that<br />
is yes. Data from the National Reporting and<br />
Learning System, which collates patient safety<br />
incident reports, showed an eleven-fold rise in<br />
patients coming to harm between 2013 and<br />
2014. The data means that patients will have<br />
experienced unnecessary sight loss in one<br />
way or another.<br />
This March, The President of the Royal<br />
College of Ophthalmologists commented<br />
on a national study being conducted by the<br />
College. Its aim is to identify patients who have<br />
come to harm due to hospital initiated delays<br />
to follow-up appointments. Preliminary results<br />
indicate that 20 patients per month are coming<br />
to harm, suffering severe and needless sight<br />
loss, as a result of delays.<br />
Clearly, that situation cannot continue and<br />
something must be done.<br />
So far, the eye care sector has responded by<br />
publishing a number of guidelines, frameworks<br />
and calls to action to help address the problem.<br />
They include the recent Royal College of<br />
Ophthalmologists’ three step plan to help<br />
overwhelmed hospital eye departments cope<br />
with demand for services.<br />
Many of those documents, however, do<br />
not offer what providers and commissioners<br />
desperately need - workable solutions which can<br />
be implemented in their area. They want proven<br />
examples of where new models of care have<br />
improved patient outcomes and helped meet<br />
efficiency savings targets.<br />
That is why the All Party Parliamentary Group<br />
on Eye Health and Visual Impairment, which<br />
I co-chair alongside Nusrat Ghani MP, will be<br />
launching an inquiry this autumn. The aim is to<br />
identify practical solutions, share them with NHS<br />
providers and commissioners, and help them<br />
create sustainable improvements for NHS eye<br />
care and patients.<br />
The inquiry, and an upcoming Parliamentary<br />
reception, will provide parliamentarians with the<br />
opportunity to engage with this issue on behalf of<br />
their constituents. I hope they will join me in this<br />
endeavour to protect the sight of people living in<br />
the UK.<br />
People who are deaf or have hearing loss<br />
often face barriers when trying to access<br />
the Labour market. Research by YouGov<br />
commissioned by Action on Hearing Loss<br />
suggests that 35 per cent of businesses would<br />
not feel confident in effectively employing a<br />
person who is deaf or has hearing loss, while<br />
57 per cent of employers surveyed feel that<br />
there is a lack of support for those employing<br />
a person who is deaf or who has hearing loss.<br />
Yet, worryingly, 63 per cent of employers<br />
have never heard of Access to Work – the fund<br />
that is supposed to help employers meet the<br />
extra costs of employing disabled people.<br />
Maybe we should not be too surprised - the<br />
Work and Pensions Select Committee once<br />
dubbed the scheme as the “DWP’s hidden<br />
secret.” It is a missed opportunity. If the<br />
Government is really committed to halving<br />
the disability employment gap, it needs to<br />
provide employers with the support they<br />
need, and needs to publicise more widely<br />
existing measures like Access to Work that<br />
already work well.<br />
The vast majority of disabled people are<br />
able to work and want to work. Enabling them<br />
to access the labour market more easily<br />
should be pushing at an open door, but the<br />
‘one size fits nobody’ approach of recent<br />
years - like the Work Programme - have been<br />
far less successful than tailored, personcentred<br />
employment support services, like<br />
Action of Hearing Loss’s unique “Moving On”<br />
programme, which has delivered a 60 per cent<br />
success rate in leading people who are deaf<br />
or have hearing loss to positive destinations<br />
in employment.<br />
Jobseekers who are deaf or have hearing<br />
loss need personalised employment support,<br />
but the current system fails to provide<br />
adequate tailored support consistently. The<br />
Government’s long awaited new Work and<br />
Health Programme provides an opportunity<br />
to overhaul the barriers to work for many<br />
disabled people, including those who are<br />
deaf. Consideration must be given to the role<br />
that third sector providers - who are able to<br />
offer a more specialist, personalised service<br />
– can play, and their expertise in developing<br />
the new programme.<br />
If good quality employment support for<br />
jobseekers can be matched with quality<br />
support for employers, there is a winwin<br />
situation. There are tangible personal<br />
economic and social benefits to be gained<br />
from employment – but we need to provide<br />
practical support and advice to employers to<br />
improve their confidence in overcoming their<br />
preconceptions and making any adaptations<br />
which might be required. Encouraging<br />
small and medium-sized businesses to take<br />
on more disabled staff will be essential to<br />
reducing the employment gap but will only<br />
happen if the right support is available.<br />
Yet there are threats to progress. By 2018,<br />
employees in receipt of Access to Work grants<br />
will have their awards capped, which will have<br />
a disproportionate impact on people who are<br />
deaf, or have hearing loss. Those people<br />
benefit from Access to Work, providing BSL<br />
interpretation and communication support to<br />
allow them to be actively involved in all types<br />
of business.<br />
The UK Government is due to publish<br />
its long awaited Green paper on disability<br />
employment. The SNP will use this<br />
consultation process to talk about the real<br />
benefits of Access to Work, and tailored,<br />
personalised employment support services<br />
like Moving On. It is time that the UK<br />
Government matched that ambition and<br />
becomes truly committed to providing support<br />
to help disabled people into employment.<br />
In Scotland, we have a unique opportunity<br />
to change the ethos of social security. Our<br />
government has already committed to putting<br />
fairness, dignity and equality at the heart of<br />
our social security service – the devolved<br />
powers in this area may be limited, but it<br />
will be important to use them for maximum<br />
impact.<br />
80<br />
81