10.12.2012 Views

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2<br />

The Legal Framework<br />

legislative history document that can be said to reflect the will <strong>of</strong> both<br />

houses.Commissioner <strong>of</strong> Internal Revenue v. Acker, 361 U.S. 87, 94 (1959)<br />

(Frankfurter, J., dissenting).<br />

Next in sequence are the reports <strong>of</strong> the legislative committees that<br />

considered the bill and reported it out to their respective houses. The<br />

Supreme Court has consistently been willing to rely on committee reports<br />

when otherwise appropriate. E.g., Demore v. Hyung Joon Kim,<br />

538 U.S. 510, 123 S. Ct. 1708, 1714–1716 (2003); Lorillard Tobacco Co. v.<br />

Reilly, 533 U.S. 525, 543–544 (2001); Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering,<br />

254 U.S. 443, 474 (1921); United States v. St. Paul, Minneapolis &<br />

Manitoba Railway Co., 247 U.S. 310, 318 (1918); Lapina v. Williams,<br />

232 U.S. 78, 90 (1914).<br />

However, material in committee reports, even a conference report, will<br />

ordinarily not be used to controvert clear statutory language. Squillacote,<br />

739 F.2d at 1218; Hart v. United States, 585 F.2d 1025 (Ct. Cl. 1978);<br />

B-278121, Nov. 7, 1997; B-33911, B-62187, July 15, 1948.<br />

The following excerpt from a colloquy between Senators Armstrong and<br />

Dole demonstrates why committee reports must be used with caution:<br />

“Mr. ARMSTRONG. Mr. President, did members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Finance Committee vote on the committee report?<br />

“Mr. DOLE. No.<br />

“Mr. ARMSTRONG. Mr. President, the reason I raise the<br />

issue is not perhaps apparent on the surface… . The report<br />

itself is not considered by the Committee on Finance. It was<br />

not subject to amendment by the Committee on Finance. It<br />

is not subject to amendment now by the Senate.<br />

…<br />

“I only wish the record to reflect that this is not statutory<br />

language. It is not before us. If there were matter within this<br />

report which was disagreed to by the Senator from<br />

Colorado or even by a majority <strong>of</strong> all Senators, there would<br />

be no way for us to change the report. I could not <strong>of</strong>fer an<br />

amendment tonight to amend the committee report.<br />

Page 2-99 GAO-04-261SP <strong>Appropriations</strong> <strong>Law</strong>—Vol. I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!