10.12.2012 Views

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4<br />

Availability <strong>of</strong> <strong>Appropriations</strong>: Purpose<br />

(3) Tolls<br />

State and local authorities frequently charge tolls for the use <strong>of</strong> stateowned<br />

highways, bridges, or tunnels. “A tax is a demand <strong>of</strong> sovereignty; a<br />

toll, a demand <strong>of</strong> proprietorship.” In re State Freight Tax, 82 U.S. (15 Wall.)<br />

232, 278 (1872). Thus, it has long been established that a toll is not a tax,<br />

but is a charge for the use <strong>of</strong> the road, bridge, or tunnel. Sands v. Manistee<br />

River Improvement Co., 123 U.S. 288, 294 (1887). Because tolls do not raise<br />

questions <strong>of</strong> federal tax immunity, they are properly payable where<br />

necessarily incurred in the performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial business. 9 Comp.<br />

Gen. 41, 42 (1929); 4 Comp. Gen. 366 (1924); 24 Comp. Dec. 45 (1917).<br />

Statutory authority now exists for the reimbursement <strong>of</strong> tolls incurred by<br />

government employees on <strong>of</strong>ficial travel. 5 U.S.C. § 5704(d); 35 Comp.<br />

Gen. 92 (1955).<br />

GAO has also held that appropriated funds may be used to purchase annual<br />

toll road permits where justified by anticipated usage. 191 Similarly, if an<br />

employee who frequently uses a toll road on <strong>of</strong>ficial business purchases an<br />

annual permit for his or her own automobile, the agency may reimburse the<br />

toll charges that would otherwise have been incurred, on a per trip basis,<br />

not to exceed the cost <strong>of</strong> the annual permit. 34 Comp. Gen. 556 (1955).<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the early decisions held that a toll could not be paid if the<br />

particular highway, bridge, or tunnel was constructed with the aid <strong>of</strong><br />

federal funds. 9 Comp. Gen. at 42; 24 Comp. Dec. at 48. The statement in<br />

24 Comp. Dec. was based on legislation that authorized federal financial<br />

assistance but also prohibited the charging <strong>of</strong> “tolls <strong>of</strong> all kinds.” Id. at 47.<br />

The <strong>Federal</strong>-Aid Highway Act includes an almost identical prohibition<br />

(23 U.S.C. § 301), but also authorizes tolls in certain circumstances<br />

(23 U.S.C. § 129). The editors have found no discussion <strong>of</strong> this issue under<br />

the modern legislation, nor have we found any guidance as to how, apart<br />

from the interstate highway system, a federal employee would know which<br />

roads were constructed with aid. Regardless, it would seem prudent to<br />

apply the concept <strong>of</strong> 52 Comp. Gen. 83 (1972), discussed above under<br />

parking taxes, in conjunction with the reimbursement authority <strong>of</strong> 5 U.S.C.<br />

§ 5704.<br />

191 These purchases do not violate the statutory prohibition on advance payments because,<br />

GAO reasoned, the government did not make an advance payment but rather purchased a<br />

present right to use the thoroughfare in the future. 36 Comp. Gen. 829 (1957).<br />

Page 4-305 GAO-04-261SP <strong>Appropriations</strong> <strong>Law</strong>—Vol. I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!