10.12.2012 Views

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4<br />

Availability <strong>of</strong> <strong>Appropriations</strong>: Purpose<br />

letter, GAO noted the principle that funds in the hands <strong>of</strong> a grantee largely<br />

lose their identity as federal funds and said that the applicability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

publicity and propaganda statute was therefore “questionable.” B-158371,<br />

Nov. 11, 1977 (nondecision letter). A 1978 letter to a Member <strong>of</strong> the Senate<br />

said that the issue should be addressed on a case-by-case basis. B-129874,<br />

Aug. 15, 1978.<br />

In B-128938, July 12, 1976, GAO said that an agency has a responsibility to<br />

insure that its appropriations are not used to violate the anti-lobbying<br />

statute. While the case involved expenditures by a contractor, the principle<br />

would seemingly apply as well to a grantee.<br />

Finally, in B-202975(1), Nov. 3, 1981, the Comptroller General resolved the<br />

uncertainty, applied the concept <strong>of</strong> B-128938, and concluded that:<br />

“<strong>Federal</strong> agencies and departments are responsible for<br />

insuring that <strong>Federal</strong> funds made available to grantees are<br />

not used contrary to [the publicity and propaganda]<br />

restriction.”<br />

The case involved the Los Angeles Downtown People Mover Authority, a<br />

grantee <strong>of</strong> the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA),<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation. Fearing that its funding was in jeopardy, the<br />

Authority prepared and distributed a newsletter urging readers to write to<br />

their elected representatives in Congress to support continued funding for<br />

the People Mover project. The Comptroller General found that this<br />

newsletter, to the extent it involved UMTA grant funds, violated the antilobbying<br />

statute.<br />

Similarly, in 1996, GAO determined that the state <strong>of</strong> Nevada improperly<br />

used grant funds in violation <strong>of</strong> a broad provision found in the annual<br />

Energy and Water Development appropriation acts prohibiting the use <strong>of</strong><br />

federal funds to influence legislation and other lobbying activities. 146 See<br />

U.S. General Accounting Office, Nuclear Waste: Nevada’s Use <strong>of</strong> Nuclear<br />

Waste Grant Funds, GAO/RCED-96-72 (Washington, D.C.: Mar. 20, 1996).<br />

146 “[N]one <strong>of</strong> the funds herein appropriated may be used directly or indirectly to influence<br />

legislative action on any matter pending before Congress or a State legislature or for any<br />

lobbying activity as provided in section 1913 <strong>of</strong> title 18, United States Code.” Energy and<br />

Water Development <strong>Appropriations</strong> Act, 1995, Pub. L. No. 103-316, 108 Stat. 1707, 1716<br />

(Aug. 26, 1994).<br />

Page 4-226 GAO-04-261SP <strong>Appropriations</strong> <strong>Law</strong>—Vol. I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!