10.12.2012 Views

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

. Hiring <strong>of</strong> Attorneys by<br />

<strong>Government</strong> Agencies<br />

Chapter 4<br />

Availability <strong>of</strong> <strong>Appropriations</strong>: Purpose<br />

B-189045, Jan. 26, 1979. To illustrate, a vendor who successfully filed a<br />

claim for the payment <strong>of</strong> goods sold and delivered to a Navy vessel was not<br />

entitled to reimbursement <strong>of</strong> attorney’s fees. B-187877, Apr. 14, 1977.<br />

Similarly nonreimbursable were legal fees incurred incident to prosecuting<br />

a claim for damages for breach <strong>of</strong> an oral agreement. B-188607, July 19,<br />

1977. “Fairness” and “decency,” however appealing, do not compensate for<br />

the lack <strong>of</strong> statutory authority. 67 Comp. Gen. 574, 576 (1988); 57 Comp.<br />

Gen. 856, 861 (1978).<br />

Payments to attorneys also arise in a number <strong>of</strong> situations that are, strictly<br />

speaking, not applications <strong>of</strong> the American Rule, that is, which do not<br />

involve payment <strong>of</strong> fees to a “prevailing party.” The approach in these cases<br />

is to look first for statutory authority and if express statutory authority<br />

does not exist, apply the various principles discussed throughout this<br />

publication, such as the necessary expense doctrine.<br />

For example, a private attorney sought reimbursement for out-<strong>of</strong>-pocket<br />

expenses he incurred incident to a “special proceeding” initiated by the<br />

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to investigate charges <strong>of</strong><br />

misconduct raised by the attorney against NRC staff members and by the<br />

staff members against the attorney. There was no statutory authority to<br />

reimburse the attorney, nor could the payment be justified as a necessary<br />

expense since it was not reasonably necessary to carrying out NRC<br />

functions. Therefore, payment was unauthorized. B-192784, Jan. 10, 1979.<br />

In another case, the Small Business Administration (SBA) could not<br />

reimburse a bank for legal fees the bank incurred in protecting its interest<br />

in an SBA-guaranteed loan since SBA neither contracted with the attorney<br />

nor did it benefit from his services. B-187950, Apr. 26, 1977.<br />

The Justice Department has held that legal fees incurred by a Cabinet<br />

nominee in connection with Senate confirmation hearings, for services<br />

rendered before the nominating administration took <strong>of</strong>fice, could be paid<br />

either from Presidential Transition Act appropriations or from private<br />

sources. 5 Op. Off. Legal Counsel 126 (1981).<br />

The remainder <strong>of</strong> this section will discuss the situations that have been<br />

most commonly addressed in decisions <strong>of</strong> the Comptroller General.<br />

During the first century <strong>of</strong> the Republic, government agencies who needed<br />

lawyers either as counsellors or litigators simply went out and hired them.<br />

Not only was this system expensive (payments from the public treasury are<br />

not conducive to reduced fees), it resulted in inconsistencies in the<br />

Page 4-52 GAO-04-261SP <strong>Appropriations</strong> <strong>Law</strong>—Vol. I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!