10.12.2012 Views

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

Principles of Federal Appropriations Law - US Government ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4<br />

Availability <strong>of</strong> <strong>Appropriations</strong>: Purpose<br />

Interior restriction. One aspect <strong>of</strong> this decision involved an NEA <strong>of</strong>ficial’s<br />

remarks at an arts conference. In response to a question from the audience<br />

concerning what the audience could do to support NEA, the <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

responded that they could contact their congressional representatives.<br />

GAO’s investigation concluded that there was no intent to promote. The<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial’s response was incidental to her presentation and not part <strong>of</strong> any<br />

plan to generate action on the part <strong>of</strong> her audience. The <strong>of</strong>ficial’s answer<br />

was viewed as more <strong>of</strong> a civics lesson, informational in nature, rather than<br />

an exhortation to contact Congress.<br />

(9) Dissemination <strong>of</strong> political or misleading information<br />

Generally speaking, funds appropriated to carry out a particular program<br />

would not be available for political purposes, that is, for a propaganda<br />

effort designed to aid a political party or candidate. See B-147578, Nov. 8,<br />

1962. If for no other reason, such an expenditure would be improper as a<br />

use <strong>of</strong> funds for other than their intended purpose in violation <strong>of</strong> 31 U.S.C.<br />

§ 1301(a). However, the publicity and propaganda statute does not provide<br />

adequate guidelines to distinguish between legitimate and purely political<br />

activities and is therefore applicable to “political” activities only to the<br />

extent that the activities would otherwise constitute a violation. See<br />

B-130961, Oct. 26, 1972.<br />

In more general terms, it is always difficult to find that conduct is so purely<br />

political as to constitute a purpose violation. As stated in B-144323, Nov. 4,<br />

1960:<br />

“[The question is] whether in any particular case a speech or<br />

a release by a cabinet <strong>of</strong>ficer can be said to be so completely<br />

devoid <strong>of</strong> any connection with <strong>of</strong>ficial functions or so<br />

political in nature that it is not in furtherance <strong>of</strong> the purpose<br />

for which <strong>Government</strong> funds were appropriated, thereby<br />

making the use <strong>of</strong> such funds …unauthorized. This is<br />

extremely difficult to determine in most cases as the lines<br />

separating the nonpolitical from the political cannot be<br />

precisely drawn.<br />

“…As a practical matter, even if we were to conclude that<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> appropriated funds for any given speech or its<br />

release was unauthorized, the amount involved would be<br />

small, and difficult to ascertain; and the results <strong>of</strong> any<br />

corrective action might well be more technical than real.”<br />

Page 4-218 GAO-04-261SP <strong>Appropriations</strong> <strong>Law</strong>—Vol. I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!