11.12.2012 Views

Intermediate Financial Management (with Thomson One)

Intermediate Financial Management (with Thomson One)

Intermediate Financial Management (with Thomson One)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

To find the rate on a<br />

T-bond, go to http://www<br />

.federalreserve.gov. Select<br />

“Economic Research and<br />

Data,” and then select<br />

“Statistics: Releases and<br />

Historical Data.” Click on<br />

“Daily” for H.15, “Selected<br />

Interest Rates.”<br />

324 • Part 2 Corporate Valuation<br />

Equation 10-3 shows that the CAPM estimate of r s begins <strong>with</strong> the risk-free rate,<br />

r RF , to which is added a risk premium set equal to the risk premium on the market,<br />

RP M , scaled up or down to reflect the particular stock’s risk as measured by<br />

its beta coefficient. The following sections explain how to implement the four-step<br />

process.<br />

Estimating the Risk-Free Rate<br />

The starting point for the CAPM cost of equity estimate is r RF , the risk-free rate.<br />

There is really no such thing as a truly riskless asset in the U.S. economy. Treasury<br />

securities are essentially free of default risk, but nonindexed long-term T-bonds will<br />

suffer capital losses if interest rates rise, and a portfolio of short-term T-bills will<br />

provide a volatile earnings stream because the rate earned on T-bills varies over<br />

time.<br />

Since we cannot in practice find a truly riskless rate upon which to base the<br />

CAPM, what rate should we use? A recent survey of highly regarded companies<br />

shows that about two-thirds of the companies use the rate on long-term Treasury<br />

bonds. 6 We agree <strong>with</strong> their choice, and here are our reasons:<br />

1. Common stocks are long-term securities, and although a particular stockholder<br />

may not have a long investment horizon, most stockholders do invest<br />

on a long-term basis. Therefore, it is reasonable to think that stock returns<br />

embody long-term inflation expectations similar to those reflected in bonds<br />

rather than the short-term expectations in bills.<br />

2. Treasury bill rates are more volatile than are Treasury bond rates and, most<br />

experts agree, more volatile than rs . 7<br />

3. In theory, the CAPM is supposed to measure the expected return over a particular<br />

holding period. When it is used to estimate the cost of equity for a<br />

project, the theoretically correct holding period is the life of the project. Since<br />

many projects have long lives, the holding period for the CAPM also should<br />

be long. Therefore, the rate on a long-term T-bond is a logical choice for the<br />

risk-free rate.<br />

In light of the preceding discussion, we believe that the cost of common equity<br />

is more closely related to Treasury bond rates than to T-bill rates. This leads us to<br />

favor T-bonds as the base rate, or rRF , in a CAPM cost of equity analysis. T-bond<br />

rates can be found in The Wall Street Journal or the Federal Reserve Bulletin.<br />

Generally, we use the yield on a 10-year T-bond as the proxy for the risk-free rate.<br />

Estimating the Market Risk Premium<br />

The market risk premium, RP M, is the expected market return minus the risk-free<br />

rate. This is also called the equity risk premium, or just the equity premium. It is<br />

caused by investor risk aversion: Since most investors are averse to risk, they<br />

require a higher expected return (a risk premium) to induce them to invest in risky<br />

6 See Robert E. Bruner, Kenneth M. Eades, Robert S. Harris, and Robert C. Higgins, “Best Practices in Estimating the Cost of<br />

Capital: Survey and Synthesis,” <strong>Financial</strong> Practice and Education, Spring/Summer 1998, pp. 13–28.<br />

7 Economic events usually have a larger impact on short-term rates than on long-term rates. For example, see the analysis<br />

of the 1995–1996 federal debt limit disagreement between the White House and Congress provided in Srinivas Nippani,<br />

Pu Liu, and Craig T. Schulman, “Are Treasury Securities Free of Default?” Journal of <strong>Financial</strong> and Quantitative Analysis,<br />

June 2001, pp. 251–266.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!