11.12.2012 Views

Intermediate Financial Management (with Thomson One)

Intermediate Financial Management (with Thomson One)

Intermediate Financial Management (with Thomson One)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Self-Test Questions<br />

374 • Part 2 Corporate Valuation<br />

valuable than an 18.9 percent return on $255.3 million of capital. 5 You, or one of<br />

Bell’s stockholders, would surely rather have an asset that provides a 50 percent<br />

return on an investment of $1,000 than one that provides a 100 percent return on<br />

an investment of $1. Therefore, the new plan should be accepted, even though it<br />

lowers the Instruments division’s expected ROIC.<br />

Sometimes companies focus on their profitability and growth, <strong>with</strong>out giving<br />

adequate consideration to their capital requirements. This is a big mistake—all the<br />

wealth creation drivers must be taken into account, not just growth. Fortunately<br />

for Bell’s investors, the revised plan was accepted. However, as this example<br />

illustrates, it is easy for a company to mistakenly focus only on profitability<br />

and growth. They are important, but so are the other value drivers—capital<br />

requirements and the weighted average cost of capital. Value-based management<br />

explicitly includes the effects of all the value drivers because it uses the corporate<br />

valuation model, and they are all embodied in the model.<br />

What are the four value drivers?<br />

How is it possible that sales growth would decrease the value of a profitable firm?<br />

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND SHAREHOLDER WEALTH<br />

See the Web pages of<br />

CalPERS (the California<br />

Public Employees’<br />

Retirement System),<br />

http://www.calpers.org,<br />

and TIAA–CREF (Teachers<br />

Insurance and Annuity<br />

Association College<br />

Retirement Equity Fund),<br />

http://www.tiaa.org, for<br />

excellent discussions of<br />

shareholder-friendly<br />

corporate governance.<br />

Shareholders want companies to hire managers who are able and willing to take<br />

whatever legal and ethical actions they can to maximize stock prices. 6 This obviously<br />

requires managers <strong>with</strong> technical competence, but it also requires managers<br />

who are willing to put forth the extra effort necessary to identify and implement<br />

value-adding activities. However, managers are people, and people have both<br />

personal and corporate goals. Logically, therefore, managers can be expected to<br />

act in their own self-interests, and if their self-interests are not aligned <strong>with</strong> those<br />

of stockholders, then corporate value will not be maximized. Managers may<br />

spend too much time golfing, lunching, surfing the Net, and so forth, rather than<br />

focusing on corporate tasks, and they may also use corporate resources on activities<br />

that benefit themselves rather than shareholders. So, a key aspect of valuebased<br />

management is to motivate executives and other managers to actually take<br />

the actions required under value-based management.<br />

This section deals <strong>with</strong> corporate governance, which is defined as the set of<br />

rules and procedures that ensure that managers do indeed employ the principles of<br />

value-based management. The essence of corporate governance is to make sure<br />

that the key shareholder objective—wealth maximization—is implemented. Most<br />

corporate governance provisions come in two forms, sticks and carrots. The primary<br />

stick is the threat of removal, either as a decision by the board of directors<br />

or as the result of a hostile takeover. If a firm’s managers are maximizing the value<br />

of the resources entrusted to them, they need not fear the loss of their jobs. On the<br />

other hand, if managers are not maximizing value, they may well be removed, by<br />

5 A potential fly in the ointment is the possibility that Bell has a compensation plan based on rates of return and not on<br />

changes in wealth. In such a plan, which is fairly typical, the managers might reject the new proposed strategic plan if it<br />

lowers ROIC and, hence, their bonuses, even though the plan is good for the company’s stockholders. We discuss the<br />

effect of compensation plans in more detail later in the chapter.<br />

6 Notice that we said both legal and ethical actions. The accounting frauds perpetrated by Enron, WorldCom, and others<br />

that were uncovered in 2002 raised stock prices in the short run, but only because investors were misled about the companies’<br />

financial positions. Then, when the correct financial information was finally revealed, the stocks tanked. Investors<br />

who bought shares based on the fraudulent financial statements lost tens of billions of dollars. Releasing false financial<br />

statements is illegal. Aggressive earnings management and the use of misleading accounting tricks to pump up reported<br />

earnings is unethical, and executives should and will go to jail as a result of their shenanigans. When we speak of taking<br />

actions to maximize stock prices, we mean making operational or financial changes designed to maximize intrinsic stock<br />

value, not fooling investors <strong>with</strong> false or misleading financial reports.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!