06.06.2017 Views

Maximum_PC_June_2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

yzen motherboards<br />

how we<br />

tested<br />

we knew this supertest was going to be<br />

a turbulent one, because of how brand new<br />

architectures tend to operate, so we cast our net<br />

wide from the start, but that didn’t prevent a few<br />

headaches along the way.<br />

Taking a cross section from MSI, Asus, and<br />

Gigabyte, we originally chose nine motherboards,<br />

both X370 and B350, before whittling the list down<br />

to five. Four boards didn’t make it through—three<br />

due to testing failures, and one simply didn’t<br />

arrive in time.<br />

Notable mentions: the Asus Prime X370-<br />

Pro and the MSI B350 Tomahawk. We spoke<br />

briefly earlier about how each section of Asus’s<br />

massive structure is broken down into individual<br />

teams, with each part working autonomously—<br />

unfortunately, not all parts are equal. ROG vastly<br />

outshines the Pro team when it comes to BIOS<br />

stability—in fact, we bricked two Prime X370-<br />

Pros. One during the initial Ryzen launch via a<br />

BIOS update, and the replacement died following a<br />

similar event (although it made it past the update,<br />

failing to boot Windows). With the Tomahawk,<br />

we didn’t even make it to BIOS, unfortunately,<br />

regardless of what configuration we used. That’s<br />

not to say these motherboards are a no-go area,<br />

just that if you’re thinking of buying cheap, yet<br />

still want to push the boundaries when it comes<br />

to running above stock 2,133MT/s or processor<br />

overclocks, it might be worth holding off for a<br />

month or two longer.<br />

For the time being, it seems Ryzen’s top-end<br />

chipset has had most of the bugs ironed out, at<br />

least for the more premium lines associated<br />

with each brand. However, the budget-oriented<br />

options may need a little extra time.<br />

Our testing setup consisted of an AMD Ryzen<br />

7 1800X, 16GB (2x 8GB) of Corsair Vengeance<br />

LPX DDR4 capable of clocking up to 3,000MT/s<br />

(provided by AMD), an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080,<br />

a Samsung 850 Evo 250GB OS drive, with a clean<br />

install of Windows 10, plus an ADATA SX8000<br />

256GB <strong>PC</strong>Ie SSD to test out the M.2 ports, and you<br />

can see how each board performed below.<br />

BENCHMARkS<br />

Asus ROG<br />

Crosshair VI<br />

Hero<br />

Gigabyte<br />

GA-AB350-<br />

Gaming 3<br />

Gigabyte<br />

GA-AX370-<br />

Gaming 5<br />

MSI X370<br />

Gaming Pro<br />

Carbon<br />

MSI X370<br />

XP ower Gaming<br />

Titanium<br />

X265 (fps) 27.97 26.33 27.96 27.98 26.98<br />

Cinebench r15 (Index) 1,616 1,585 1,614 1,622 1,615<br />

fry render (m:s) 2:38 2:58 2:38 2:38 2:41<br />

aIda 64 Memory latency (ns) 89 100 83 90 93<br />

Crystaldisk Sequential<br />

read Sata (MB/s)<br />

550 550 550 550 551<br />

Crystaldisk Sequential<br />

write Sata (MB/s)<br />

525 528 514 523 495<br />

Crystaldisk Sequential<br />

read M.2 (MB/s)<br />

2,339 2,349 2,430 2,428 2,404<br />

Crystaldisk Sequential<br />

write M.2 (MB/s)<br />

1,158 956 957 1,200 1,004<br />

Power draw Idle (w) 51 55 62 56 61<br />

Power draw Peak (w) 164 146 197 147 166<br />

far Cry Primal (avg fps) 42 41 42 42 42<br />

3dMark fire Strike<br />

extreme (Index)<br />

9,718 9,755 9,709 9,647 9,706<br />

Max Memory oC (Mt/s) 3,000 2,133 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />

Best scores are in bold. All game benchmarks tested at 1440p, with AA ramped up, at the highest possible graphics preset.<br />

38 MAXIMUM<strong>PC</strong> jun <strong>2017</strong> maximumpc.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!