BookOne
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS LEARNING PROGRAMME <br />
LEARNING MATERIAL <br />
BOOK ONE
TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />
THE CODE OF RIGHTS <br />
7 <br />
1. Putting the Code of Rights in to Practice. 8 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: n/a <br />
8 <br />
YOUR EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT <br />
9 <br />
2. Your Employment Agreement. 10 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 1.1 <br />
10 <br />
YOUR JOB DESCRIPTION <br />
WHAT ARE BOUNDARIES? <br />
11 <br />
12 <br />
3. Your Job Description and Boundaries 13 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 1.1 <br />
13 <br />
MOVING ON / CLOSURE. <br />
14 <br />
4. Support Partnerships That End. 15 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: n/a <br />
15 <br />
THE SUPPORT PLAN <br />
16 <br />
5. Person-centred Support Plans. 18 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28528v1: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.2 <br />
19 <br />
INTENTIONAL SAFEGUARD PLANS <br />
20 <br />
6. Intentional Safeguard Plan (also known as Risk Management Plans or Risk and Vulnerability <br />
Plans) <br />
22 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US23389v3: 1.1, 2.1(5b), 2.2 (5c), 2.3 (5d), 2.3 (5e). US28528v1: 2.4 24 <br />
OBSERVING CHANGES <br />
24 <br />
7. Observing Change 25 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US27459v2: 1.1, 1.2. <br />
25 <br />
8. Reporting Change 26 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US27459v2: 1.2, 1.3. <br />
26 <br />
Observing and Responding to Changes - COORDINATOR VERIFICATION <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US274592v2: 2.1. <br />
26 <br />
27 <br />
WHAT IS DISABILITY? <br />
27 <br />
9. Values and Attitudes of Society. 36 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28523v1: 1.1, 1.2 <br />
37 <br />
2
VALUES AND ATTITUDES IN THE WORKPLACE <br />
37 <br />
10. Acting Professionally and Ethically in the Workplace. 38 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 3.3 <br />
39 <br />
CONFIDENTIALITY (PRIVACY) <br />
40 <br />
11. Confidentiality (Privacy) 40 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: n/a <br />
41 <br />
TIME MANAGEMENT <br />
Time Management Coordinator Verification Form <br />
41 <br />
43 <br />
ETHICS <br />
44 <br />
12. Values 45 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 <br />
47 <br />
13. Community Connections’ Ethics 48 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 1.2, US28528v1: 2.4. <br />
49 <br />
14. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 49 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 3.1, 3.2 <br />
50 <br />
Ethical and Professional Behaviour Coordinator Verification Form: <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4. <br />
50 <br />
51 <br />
15. Ethical Responsibilities to Others 51 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 1.3. <br />
52 <br />
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH <br />
53 <br />
16. Personal Protective Equipment. 58 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28536v1: 2.2 <br />
59 <br />
17. Health and Safety Practices 60 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28536v1: 1.1 <br />
60 <br />
18. Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities 60 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28536v1: 1.2 <br />
61 <br />
19. Hazards 61 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28536v1: 2.1, 2.3. <br />
62 <br />
20. Responding to Emergencies. 62 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28536v1: 1.4. <br />
63 <br />
Health and Safety Coordinator Verification Form <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28536v1: 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2 <br />
63 <br />
64 <br />
MANAGING STRESS <br />
64 <br />
21. Stress. 66 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: n/a <br />
66 <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 3
SUSPECTED ABUSE <br />
68 <br />
22. Types of Vulnerability, and Power Relationships. 70 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28521v1: 1.1, 1.2, 2.2 <br />
71 <br />
23. Indictors of Abuse 74 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28521v1: 2.1, 2.3 <br />
75 <br />
24. Community Connections Alleged Abuse Reporting Procedures. 75 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28521v1: 3.1 <br />
75 <br />
25. Community Connections Incident Reporting Process. 75 <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28521v1: 3.2, US28536v1: 1.3, 2.4 <br />
77 <br />
4
Practical Requirements <br />
To complete this part of CCLP you need to be prepared for or with the following: <br />
• Proof that you have put the Code of Rights in to practice.<br />
• Proof around your time management.<br />
• Proof that you are ethical in your work.<br />
• Proof that you have observed changes in at least two people you work with<br />
• Proof that you use personal protective equipment in your work.<br />
• Proof that you have participated in OSH procedures.<br />
PLEASE ALERT YOUR COORDINATOR WHEN… <br />
! You believe you have an example of when you have shown<br />
professional and ethical behaviour by working within the boundaries<br />
of your role. Note it on your timesheet and alert your Coordinator.<br />
E.g. A person you support asks you to join them and a friend for<br />
takeaways. You explain that you are not a friend, but are a paid<br />
support person and it wouldn’t be professional or ethical of you to<br />
join them in those circumstances.<br />
! You believe you have an example of when you have behaved professionally and<br />
ethically in your work activities. Note it on your timesheet and alert your<br />
Coordinator.<br />
E.g. You keep good written records, you attend meetings on time, you arrive to<br />
support on time, you follow policy and procedure etc.<br />
! You believe you have an example of when you have behaved professionally and<br />
ethically in your interaction with others. Note it on your timesheet and alert your<br />
Coordinator.<br />
E.g. You chose not to participate in a conversation because it was about a person<br />
who wasn’t present and you felt it was inappropriate to have that conversation at<br />
that time.<br />
! You believe you have an example of when you addressed an ethical issue, grievance<br />
and/or dispute according to Community Connections policy and procedures. Note it on your<br />
timesheet and alert your Coordinator.<br />
E.g. You didn’t agree with something that was happening at work, so you talked<br />
about it with your Coordinator in coaching and then addressed the issue in a<br />
respectful manner according to a specific CC policy.<br />
! You believe you have an example of when you have maintained a professional, cultural and<br />
age-appropriate physical, emotional, sexual and spiritual boundary. Note it on your<br />
timesheet and alert your Coordinator.<br />
E.g. You arrived to provide support and the person was still in their sleepwear. You<br />
explained that you would wait in your car until they had got dressed.<br />
! You believe you have an example of when you have worked within Community<br />
Connections policies and procedures. Note it on your timesheet and alert your<br />
Coordinator.<br />
E.g. A person wasn’t home when you arrived to support them, so you text your Coordinator<br />
and asked if there was other work that they would like you to do for that support time.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 5
! You have participated in updating either a Health and Safety Checklist , and OSH Hazard<br />
Checklist or a Pandemic Plan for a person you support.<br />
Please give your Coordinator the name of the supported person and the date that you did<br />
this.<br />
! You believe you have followed Community Connections procedures for ensuring the security<br />
of the support environment. Note it on your timesheet and alert your Coordinator.<br />
E.g. A person you support often forgets to close her curtains at night. This means that it is<br />
obvious she is alone in the house, or is sometimes visible when getting changed. You talked<br />
with her about the important of security and closing her curtains to keep herself safe.<br />
! You believe you have reported a change experienced by a person you support according to<br />
Community Connections Philosophy and Policy.<br />
! You believe that you offered a non-judgmental opinion about whether the change was<br />
positive or not for the person, and what impact that might have on the support that is<br />
presently being provided.<br />
Note it on your timesheet and alert your Coordinator.<br />
E.g. A person you support was losing weight quite quickly. Even though it was a good thing,<br />
you wondered if the speed that the weight was dropping was safe. You noted this on your<br />
time/tasksheet and also brought it up at the Catch Up meeting for that person letting the<br />
team know that you are not an expert, but that you are concerned, and are we providing<br />
enough support around the goal of weight loss?<br />
6
THE CODE OF RIGHTS<br />
The Health and Disability Commissioner Act (1994) <br />
(often referred to as The Code of Rights – there are 10 of them) <br />
The Health and Disability Commissioner Act (1994) is one of the most important documents <br />
that underpin our work at Community Connections. <br />
The purpose of the act is to promote and protect the rights of the people we support and <br />
to make sure there is a fair, simple, speedy, and efficient resolution of complaints relating <br />
to infringements of those rights. <br />
The rights within the Act are often referred to simply as The Code of Rights. <br />
The people we support have Rights and Community Connections has Duties. <br />
Every person we support has rights under this Code, and Community Connections is obliged <br />
to take reasonable action to carry out in practice the duties in this Code. <br />
The duties are that Community Connections has to inform the people we support of their <br />
rights, and enable them to exercise their rights. <br />
This means making sure that the people we support know and understand their rights. It <br />
also means that Community Connections Policy and Procedure should reflect the Code of <br />
Rights and that Community Connections should seek feedback to ensure that the people <br />
we support feel their rights are being respected. <br />
To do this we make the Code of Rights known to each person we support by: <br />
• Putting posters explaining the Code of Rights on the walls of each office. <br />
• On first entering our service, a person we support is fully informed of their Rights by <br />
their Coordinator. <br />
• A pamphlet about the Code of Rights is included in the Supported Person’s Handbook <br />
given to each person when they enter our service. <br />
• Community Connections makes sure that all Support Staff understand the Code of <br />
Rights so that they can assist the people they support to exercise their rights – <br />
especially the right to complain. <br />
To enable people we support to exercise their rights, Community Connections:<br />
• Has a clear complaints procedure so that people we support are able to speak up if they<br />
are not happy with any aspect of their support.<br />
• Has regular questionnaires that people we support are asked to complete (with support<br />
if needed) about how happy they are with the support they receive from Community<br />
Connections.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 7
• Has SAMS audits where an outside agency comes in and talks with the people we<br />
support and their families to check that they are happy with their support.<br />
• We have policies and procedures (e.g. privacy and confidentiality policies) that support<br />
the Code of Rights.<br />
Learning Partnerships<br />
IF THE PERSON YOU SUPPORT AGREES, THIS NEXT QUESTION CAN BE COMPLETED IN<br />
YOUR SUPPORT TIME.<br />
Talk with the person you support explain to them about the question and then discuss with them how<br />
you could answer the question.<br />
Don’t forget to put your conversation and learning on your time/tasksheet – note the book number<br />
and question number. See the Learners’ Website for the amount of time you can claim.<br />
Please look at the Code of Rights now. To do this you can go to the Health <br />
and Disability Commission website (http://www.hdc.org.nz/ or look on the <br />
Learners Website under RESOURCES) or you can get a pamphlet from your <br />
Community Connections office. <br />
1. Putting the Code of Rights in to Practice.<br />
a) Please give an example of something you would say to a person you support that shows you <br />
understand their right to dignity. <br />
I would say to the person I support,<br />
“Please let me know if I do or say anything that makes you feel unhappy,<br />
uncomfortable or worried”.<br />
b) Please give an example of something you would do in your support that shows you understand <br />
that person’s right to services of an appropriate standard. <br />
When supporting a person I would make sure that I followed Community Connections’<br />
policy and procedure in the correct way and that the person I support was satisfied<br />
with my support.<br />
c) Please give an example from your support work where you have shown you have understood the right for <br />
the person you support to be fully informed. <br />
When I support ‘B’, I ask her if she has any questions about how her support is<br />
provided. ‘B’ is receiving medical treatment so I often remind her that she can ask<br />
questions about her treatment.<br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: n/a<br />
Evidence: n/a<br />
Judgement: The learner has shown an understanding of how the Code of Rights looks when it is put in to<br />
practice.<br />
Glossary<br />
8
Resolution - solving a problem or argument.<br />
Infringements - breaking the terms of a law or agreement.<br />
Obliged – bound, often by law, to do something.<br />
Exercise - The use or application of a right or process.<br />
Assist - Help by providing money or information.<br />
Enable - Make possible.<br />
Procedure - A series of actions carried out in a certain order.<br />
Aspect - A particular part of something.<br />
YOUR EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT<br />
When you were employed by Community Connections, along with your Job Description you <br />
also received an Employment Agreement. Both your Job Description and your Employment <br />
Agreement are documents that give you a clear guideline on how to work in a professional <br />
manner. <br />
Go to the Internal Website and read your Employment Agreement. (Look <br />
under STAFF category for the Collective Employment Agreement.) <br />
Your agreement is quite a long document, but you should have read through it at least <br />
once, as you agreed to it and signed it before beginning your work at Community <br />
Connections. <br />
Your Employment Agreement talks about your hours of work, what and how you get paid, <br />
any allowances you may get, training, leave entitlements, performance assessments, health <br />
and safety, sexual harassment, personal grievances, disciplinary and dismissal procedures, <br />
confidentiality etc. <br />
Now, thinking about your Employment Agreement, please answer the following questions. <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 9
2. Your Employment Agreement.<br />
According to your Employment Agreement, what are your professional responsibilities in the <br />
following areas?. <br />
E.g.<br />
Stress: I need to be responsible for my own stress levels. If I find that I am feeling stressed, then I need to talk<br />
with my Coordinator and discuss ways that my stress levels can be reduced.<br />
a) Training <br />
According to my Employment Agreement I may be required to attend training that is<br />
relevant to the work I have been employed to do.<br />
Verification -‐ Employment Agreement page number that supports your answer: <br />
C.C. Collective Employment Agreement page 8.<br />
b) Annual Leave <br />
My responsibilities are to take annual leave in the year that it falls due unless<br />
otherwise agreed in writing. I must apply for annual leave at least 4 weeks before the<br />
proposed leave.<br />
Verification -‐ Employment Agreement page number that supports your answer: <br />
C.C. Collective Employment Agreement page 9.<br />
c) Coaching <br />
I am required to attend coaching with my manager and if I should need to cancel<br />
coaching for any reason, I need to give 24 hours notice and arrange another time<br />
within one month.<br />
Verification -‐ Employment Agreement page number that supports your answer: <br />
C.C. Collective Employment Agreement page 15<br />
d) Confidentiality <br />
I must not share any information about any person supported by Community<br />
Connections, their family, or confidential information about Community Connections’<br />
business.<br />
Verification -‐ Employment Agreement page number that supports your answer: <br />
C.C. Collective Employment Agreement page 18<br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 1.1<br />
Evidence: Quotes from the Collective Employment Agreement to verify that it has been read.<br />
Judgement: Professsional behaviour is described in terms of CC policy (Collective Employment Agreement).<br />
Glossary:<br />
Professional - Having the skill appropriate to a professional person; being skillful.<br />
Entitlements - The amount to which a person has a right.<br />
Assessment - Judging the quality, or ability of someone or something.<br />
Performance - Carrying out an action, task, or function.<br />
Harassment - Aggressive pressure or intimidation.<br />
10
Grievances - An official statement of a complaint over something believed to be<br />
wrong or unfair.<br />
Disciplinary - A system of rules of conduct.<br />
Dismissal - Removing someone from employment or office.<br />
Confidentiality - Keeping something secret or private.<br />
YOUR JOB DESCRIPTION<br />
When you began your job with Community Connections you would have been given both a <br />
Job Description and an Employment Agreement. <br />
Go to the Internal Website and have a look at your Job Description. <br />
Your job description tells you who you report to and what your specific duties are. It also <br />
tells you how you know you have carried out those duties correctly by giving you <br />
Performance Indicators (sometimes referred to as KPI’s – key performance indicators). <br />
As you read through your job description, you should get a good idea about what your job <br />
involves. You should be getting an understanding of how you will be working with the <br />
people you support, with your colleagues and with Community Connections as a whole. <br />
Hopefully you will have a clear understanding of what is expected of you – and what is not <br />
expected of you! In this way, your job description also tells you about your boundaries as a <br />
Support Person. <br />
Glossary:<br />
Specific – About a particular subject.<br />
Indictors - A thing that shows the state or level of something:<br />
Colleagues – People you work with, workmates.<br />
Boundaries - A limit of a subject or range of activity.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 11
WHAT ARE BOUNDARIES?<br />
Boundaries are how you make sure that you are working professionally. They are the lines <br />
that decide what you will do or won’t do while supporting a person. <br />
Perhaps the best way of explaining boundaries for a Support Worker is the term “friendly – <br />
not friends”. Always remember that you are in the lives of the people you support because <br />
you are paid to be there. <br />
It is very easy to find ourselves becoming close to the people we support. This is a good <br />
thing as our work is all about relationships, but we need to remember that our relationship <br />
– close though it may be – is still a paid one, just like you and your hairdresser, or plumber <br />
etc. <br />
Being a support person can mean that you have a lot of involvement in the personal lives of <br />
the people you support and the lives of their family and friends. You will probably have <br />
knowledge of personal or confidential information. Sometimes as a result of this, you might <br />
be asked to do things that are not actually part of your role as a support worker. <br />
Throughout all of Community Connections’ Policies and Procedures you will find pieces that <br />
relate to boundaries (see two examples below), but the Policies and Procedures as a whole <br />
are the best way for you to know your boundaries. They cover most situations you might <br />
encounter and give you guidance as to what is expected of you. <br />
Here are some tips that will help you with keeping boundaries: <br />
• Talk about your role as a support person with the person you support and their<br />
network. Make sure that you all have the same understanding of what it is that you<br />
are doing in that person’s life.<br />
• Check it’s right – every now and then, ask the person you support how they think<br />
your relationship is going.<br />
• Be careful about providing too much information about yourself and your own private<br />
life. Some disclosure is ok, because not sharing to some extent can create a sense<br />
of imbalance in the support relationship. But make sure that the person you support<br />
is not getting too involved in your happiness or wellness.<br />
• You have an obligation to discuss things with your Coordinator if you have concerns<br />
regarding collegues who may not be respecting boundaries. This is not ‘dobbing’ –<br />
it’s being mindful the wellbeing of the people that we support.<br />
12
• Most importantly, talk with your Coordinator. Make sure that you attend your<br />
coaching sessions and team meetings. Keep in touch with your fellow support<br />
workers. All these things will help if you find yourself ‘blurring the boundaries’.<br />
Signs of Boundary Problems: <br />
• Disclosing your own personal information to people you support and/or their families.<br />
This includes talking about marital, financial, family problems etc that you may be<br />
having.<br />
• Visiting people you support outside of your scheduled working hours.<br />
• Inviting people you support to your own home.<br />
• Continually staying longer than your scheduled hours.<br />
• Worrying about the people you support when you go home.<br />
• Feeling that you are the only one who really understands the person you support (or<br />
really understands their support needs).<br />
• Accepting money or gifts from the people you support.<br />
Learning Partnerships<br />
IF THE PERSON YOU SUPPORT AGREES, THIS NEXT QUESTION CAN BE COMPLETED IN<br />
YOUR SUPPORT TIME.<br />
Talk with the person you support explain to them about the question and then discuss with them<br />
how you could answer the question.<br />
Don’t forget to put your conversation and learning on your time/tasksheet – note the book<br />
number and question number. See the Learners’ Website for the amount of time you can claim.<br />
3. Your Job Description and Boundaries<br />
Working to your Job Description and practicing good boundaries are examples of acting <br />
PROFESSIONALLY. <br />
Please give an example of a time when you have used your Job Description to guide you in setting <br />
boundaries, or helping the person you support to understand that you are not able to work outside <br />
your boundaries. <br />
A person I support asked me to drive him to his girlfriend’s house. I explained that this<br />
was not part of his support plan and that one of his goals was to become more<br />
confident using public transport.<br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known): n/a<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 1.1<br />
Evidence: n/a<br />
Judgement: Professsional behaviour is described in terms of CC policy (Job Description).<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 13
Glossary:<br />
Relationships – The way in which two or more people behave toward each other.<br />
Involvement – Emotional or personal association with someone.<br />
Personal – Of or concerning one’s private life, relationships, and emotions rather<br />
than matters connected with one’s public or professional career.<br />
Encounter – Unexpectedly experience or be faced with (something difficult<br />
or hostile).<br />
Guidance – Advice or information aimed at fixing a problem or difficulty.<br />
Disclosure – Letting new or private information be known.<br />
Imbalance – Lack of proportion or balance between two things.<br />
Obligation – An action to which a person is morally or legally bound; a duty or<br />
commitment.<br />
Respecting – With reference or regard to, paying attention to.<br />
Dobbing – tattling, snitching, telling on someone.<br />
Scheduled – A plan for intended events and times.<br />
Continually - Repeating frequently in the same way; regularly.<br />
MOVING ON / CLOSURE.<br />
Another thing we need to think about when we are working with people in a paid capacity <br />
is that Support Partnerships can change and/or end. <br />
It may be that the person being supported decides to move to another area, they may <br />
decide to use another support agency, or they may become unwell. Also, it may be that <br />
they ask for a change in Support Worker as they feel that their relationship with you is no <br />
longer working out. Another reason support partnerships end is because the person has <br />
achieved their goals and no longer feels that they need support. <br />
All these things are a perfectly natural part of people making choices about their lives. <br />
Sometimes it is easy to see these things as a negative reflection on you, but you need to <br />
remember that it’s not about you! It’s about the person you’re supporting. In a lot of cases, <br />
it might be that it’s because of something that you’ve done well, that the person now feels <br />
able to move on. <br />
So be prepared, and remember to keep your boundaries – it will make it much easier to <br />
understand and deal with changes to, and endings of, support partnerships of which you <br />
are a part. <br />
If you find that you’re not dealing with things as well as you wish, talk it through with your <br />
Coordinator in coaching. <br />
Learning Partnerships<br />
IF THE PERSON YOU SUPPORT AGREES, THIS NEXT QUESTION CAN BE COMPLETED IN<br />
14
YOUR SUPPORT TIME.<br />
Talk with the person you support explain to them about the question and then discuss with them how<br />
you could answer the question.<br />
Don’t forget to put your conversation and learning on your time/tasksheet – note the book number<br />
and question number. See the Learners’ Website for the amount of time you can claim.<br />
4. Support Partnerships That End.<br />
a: Describe two circumstances in which your support partnership with a person you support might <br />
end. <br />
AND <br />
b: How would these situations make you feel? <br />
AND <br />
c: Where would you go for support? <br />
Circumstance 1 <br />
a)Description: <br />
If the person achieved their goals and no longer needed my support<br />
b) Feelings: <br />
I would feel pleased for them and for myself as it would mean I had fulfilled my role as<br />
a support worker. I may also feel a bit sad as I would no longer have a support<br />
relationship with them.<br />
c) Support: <br />
If I were to need support with this positive outcome, I would talk to my coordinator at<br />
our next coaching session.<br />
Circumstance 2 <br />
a)Description: <br />
If the person I support asked to change to another support worker<br />
b) Feelings: <br />
I could feel upset with their decision if I was unsure about their reason. If it was<br />
because of dissatisfaction with my support, I would feel disappointed that I had let<br />
them down.<br />
c) Support: <br />
Talk to a trusted friend or colleague.<br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known): n/a<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: n/a<br />
Evidence: n/a<br />
Judgement: n/a<br />
Glossary:<br />
Capacity – A particular role or position.<br />
Achieved – Reach a desired result by effort or skill.<br />
Negative – indicating that something is not present or does not exist. (The opposite<br />
of positive.)<br />
Reflection - A thing that arises from something else.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 15
THE SUPPORT PLAN<br />
Each person you support will have a Support Plan. <br />
Person-‐Centred Planning <br />
The Support Plan is written up after a series of meetings with the person being supported, <br />
their family and any other person in the support network. This is called a person-‐centred <br />
approach to planning. Person-‐centred means that the support given to a person is based on <br />
their rights, their wishes, their goals, their choices etc. At Community Connections, a <br />
support plan should reflect the individuality, values and culture of the person, and should <br />
reflect respect and partnership between the person being supported, their unpaid support <br />
and their paid support team. <br />
A person-‐centred approach to planning also values the independence of the person being <br />
supported. Independence encourages the freedom of expression, promotes equality in <br />
partnership and strengthens the feeling of give and take (reciprocity). <br />
A person-‐centred appropach to support means that the person being supported is <br />
empowered to become an active participant in the planning their own life. The supported <br />
person is the expert of their own life – so it makes sense they’re the person making the <br />
decisions and choices for their life. Another benefit of the person-‐centred approach is that <br />
the conversation between an organisation and the person changes from service led (“this is <br />
what we can offer you, so this is how we can support you”) to person led (“this is what I <br />
want, can you support me in this?”). This is of benefit because a conversation that is person <br />
led is going to better reflect where that person is in their life at the moment, and what <br />
support they need. <br />
A person is more motivated to achieve goals on a person-‐centred plan and their whole life <br />
is more likely to be represented on the plan – rather than just the bits that Community <br />
Connections is being ‘paid for’. <br />
In summary, person-‐centred planning is about these values: <br />
• Individuality – We need to respect each person as an original and unique human<br />
being. When we do this, we understand that the only person who can really direct a<br />
support plan is the person being supported. If we do not respect individuality then<br />
16
we can end up with support plans that could be used by anyone, and don’t properly<br />
say what it is that the supported person really wants for their life.<br />
• Rights – We need to respect that each person being supported has the right to<br />
dignity, appropriate support, communication in a way they understand, informed<br />
consent etc. By respecting these rights, we promote a plan that is centred around<br />
that person’s needs and life choices.<br />
• Choice – Individual choice is a very big part of person centred planning. When we<br />
value choice we value the ability and skills that each person has within them to<br />
understand their own wishes and needs regarding their support and life choices.<br />
• Privacy – When we value privacy, we value the right for people to decide what they<br />
will share with their support team. A person-centered approach to planning<br />
acknowledges that the person will share with their team what is necessary for that<br />
team to understand and support them. But also acknowledges that support is just<br />
part of a person’s life.<br />
• Independence – When we uphold the value of independence we promote that<br />
person’s right to meet others as equals, and to form equal partnerships where give<br />
and take is respected. Person-centred planning makes sure that the meaning of<br />
independence, and how independence looks for the person supported, is<br />
established and supported.<br />
• Dignity – We must value the dignity of the person being supported in personcentered<br />
planning. Dignity acknowledges the right of the person to be seen as an<br />
individual with opinions, beliefs and the competency to make their own decisions.<br />
• Respect – Like dignity, we must value the individual as a citizen in their own right.<br />
We should, first and foremost, acknowledge them as experts in their own lives. In<br />
doing this we are empowering them to speak up, to be heard, and to lead<br />
conversations around their support.<br />
• Partnership – When we value partnership, we value a relationship that is based on<br />
good faith and trust. Partnership is important to person-centred planning because<br />
trust allows people being supported to speak honestly about their wishes and to<br />
have the confidence to ask for things that they need – rather than just pick from what<br />
is offered.<br />
• Informed Consent – Person-centered planning must have informed consent. When<br />
we value informed consent we make sure that we are communicating in a way that<br />
is right for the person, we make sure that any questions the person might have are<br />
answered. We also make sure that the person being supported understands<br />
possible consequences of choices and decisions they make as part of the planning<br />
process.<br />
YOU SHOULD HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THE SUPPORT PLAN FOR EACH PERSON <br />
THAT YOU ARE SUPPORTING. <br />
As mentioned above, the Support Plan tells you about the unique life of the person you are <br />
working alongside. It tells you of their vision for their life, and how you are required to <br />
support them towards moving closer towards that vision. <br />
The Support Plan is like a mini-‐job description. <br />
Your Job Description tells you in general terms what you will do with all the people you <br />
support, but the Support Plan tells you what you will do in detail with each individual <br />
person that you support.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 17
So while your job description tells you that you will be supporting people to live <br />
independent lives, each person’s Support Plan tells you how you will be achieving that with <br />
each particular person. <br />
You have a responsibility to keep the Support Plan relevant and up to date for the people <br />
that you support. This is a living document, and it relies upon your observations, your <br />
recording of successes and challenges, and your on-‐going conversations with that person <br />
for it to remain the important document that it is. <br />
5. Person-centred Support Plans.<br />
a: Describe why the following five values are important to a person-‐centred approach to support. <br />
Example:<br />
Individuality – All people are different with different values and beliefs. It is important in a person-centred<br />
approach to understand that they are individuals with their own beliefs and value systems.<br />
Choice: <br />
If a person is not given choice, then the plan is not truly about them.<br />
Independence: <br />
Promotes equality in partnership and reciprocity.<br />
Informed Consent: <br />
Means that the person is making choices and decisions based on full information.<br />
Respect: <br />
Personal values are accepted without judgement, therefore the person has freedom of<br />
expression and choice.<br />
Partnership: <br />
The supported person must feel that they have power in a process that is impacting on<br />
their life.<br />
b: Please dscribe THREE benefits of using a person-‐centred approach to personal planning. <br />
Benefit One is: <br />
empowerment<br />
The benefit of using this is… <br />
The person feels more able to make decisions that affect his/her life.<br />
Benefit Two is: <br />
motivation<br />
The benefit of using this is… <br />
The person is more likely to want to achieve the goals and will participate more<br />
actively<br />
Benefit Three is: <br />
Person led conversation<br />
The benefit of using this is… <br />
It better reflects where that person is at the moment and what support they need.<br />
c: How does active participation in their planning benefit the people you support? <br />
18
The person is more motivated to achieve the goals on the plan, and they are more<br />
likely to see themselves in partnership with their support person, rather than being<br />
‘directed’ by their support person.<br />
d: Describe TWO strategies you could use to encourage a person to more actively participate in <br />
their own personal planning. <br />
First Strategy: <br />
Second Strategy: <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known): n/a<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28528v1: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.2<br />
Evidence: The Learner has described five person-centred values in terms of how they supported a personcentred<br />
approach to planning. The have described the benefits of the person-centred approach and also how<br />
active participation benefits the person being supported.<br />
Judgement: The Learner has described the above in such a manner that their understanding of the theory of<br />
person-centred planning is established.<br />
Glossary:<br />
Individuality - A particular thing that makes a person different from others.<br />
Values – A person’s principles or standards of behavior; one’s judgment of what is<br />
important in life.<br />
Culture – The customs, arts, social institutions, and achievements of a particular<br />
nation, people, or other social group.<br />
Encourages – Give support, confidence, or hope to (someone).<br />
Promotes – To support or actively encourage and idea or person.<br />
Equality – Being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities.<br />
Strengthens – Make or become stronger.<br />
Empowered – Make (someone) stronger and more confident, especially in<br />
controlling their life and claiming their rights.<br />
Participant – A person who takes part in something.<br />
Expert – A person who has a very good knowledge of or skill in a particular area.<br />
Motivated – Increase (someone’s) interest in or enthusiasm for doing something.<br />
Represented – stand up for, or show for.<br />
Unique – Being the only one of its kind; unlike anything else<br />
Vision – A mental image of what the future will or could be like.<br />
Particular – Used to single out an individual member.<br />
Relevant – Closely connected or appropriate to what is being done or considered.<br />
Observations – A remark, statement, or comment based on something one has<br />
seen, heard, or noticed.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 19
Successes – The accomplishment of an aim or purpose.<br />
Challenges - A task or situation that tests someone’s abilities.<br />
INTENTIONAL SAFEGUARD<br />
PLANS<br />
(Also referred to as Risk Management Plans, or Risk and Vulnerability Plans) <br />
Each person you support will have an Intentional Safeguards Plan. <br />
The Intentional Safeguards Plan is written up after a series of meetings with the person <br />
being supported, their family and any other person in the support network. <br />
YOU SHOULD HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THE INTENTIONAL SAFEGUARDS PLAN FOR <br />
EACH PERSON THAT YOU ARE SUPPORTING. <br />
The Intentional Safeguards Plan tells you areas where the person you are supporting may <br />
be vulnerable or at risk, or may put others at risk. It tells you what the likelihood is of that <br />
risk or vulnerability occurring and the management strategies (how to respond) in the <br />
event that a situation of risk or vulnerability occurs. <br />
Management strategies can also be referred to as Management of Vulnerabilities or Risks – <br />
they are a detailed plan for support around vulnerabilities. <br />
Have a look at a blank Intentional Safeguards Plan (you can find one on <br />
the Internal Website). <br />
You will notice that there are two sections to the plan. <br />
Section 1. This section provides a checklist to identify potential areas of vulnerability of the <br />
individual and areas where the individual may put others at risk. This section is used to <br />
guide the consultation and conversations that happen as this Plan is being put together. <br />
Section 2. The second section selects areas identified in section one and develops a plan of <br />
implementation to eliminate, reduce or isolate the perceived risk. <br />
20
It is VERY important that you know these plans and that you follow the management <br />
strategies when necessary. It is important for you to know the management strategies so <br />
that you can keep the person you support and yourself safe. It is important for your <br />
colleagues or fellow support staff to know the management strategies so that they too can <br />
be safe – but also so that the entire support team is responding to situations in the same <br />
way and are providing support that is consistent. <br />
The level of vulnerability or risk is not arrived at by chance. When assessing the level, the <br />
person or people putting the plan together consider the following things. First they ask <br />
“How likely is it that this situation will occur?”, then they ask “What are the consequences <br />
of this situation occurring?”. By answering both of those questions, the level of risk is <br />
established. <br />
LIKELIHOOD <br />
The likelihood <br />
of this <br />
occurring is <br />
pretty certain. <br />
The likelihood <br />
of this <br />
occurring is <br />
likely. <br />
The likelihood <br />
of this <br />
occurring is <br />
possible <br />
The likelihood <br />
of this <br />
occurring is not <br />
likely. <br />
The likelihood <br />
of this <br />
occurring is <br />
rare. <br />
C <br />
O <br />
N <br />
S <br />
E <br />
Q <br />
U <br />
E <br />
N <br />
C <br />
E <br />
The consequences of <br />
this situation would <br />
result in high risk of <br />
harm or actual harm <br />
occurring. <br />
The consequences of <br />
this situation would <br />
result in significant risk <br />
of harm. <br />
The consequences of <br />
this situation would <br />
result in moderate risk <br />
of harm. <br />
The consequences of <br />
this situation would <br />
result in minimal risk of <br />
harm. <br />
The consequences of <br />
this situation would <br />
result in insignificant <br />
risk of harm. <br />
Crucial Crucial Immediate Likely Unlikely <br />
Crucial Immediate Likely Unlikely Unlikely <br />
Immediate Likely Likely Unlikely Remote <br />
Likely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Remote <br />
Unlikely Unlikely Remote Remote Remote <br />
- Chart taken from Careerforce workbook for US23389v1, page 64. <br />
Look in section 2 of the Intentional Safeguards Plan you have in front of you. <br />
You will see that the left hand column identifies the risk or vulnerability. <br />
The middle column identifies what the level of risk is and the right hand column tells you <br />
how you and your colleagues should be providing support (the management strategies). <br />
In Community Connections, Intentional Safeguard Plans are put together much like <br />
Personal Plans. <br />
We have an information gathering or consultation process where we talk with the person, <br />
their family and their support network. Together we look at that person’s life and their <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 21
environment. Then we ask “What are the areas here that might be a vulnerability or risk for <br />
this person?”. <br />
When we’ve done that, we might ask what has worked in a positive way in the past, what <br />
we may need to do to avoid certain situations. We make sure to try and get as much <br />
information as we can. <br />
Having got this information, the person’s Coordinator will write up the Intentional <br />
Safeguards Plan, including management strategies. When this is done, the plan needs to be <br />
understood and agreed to by the person and their family. When that is done, the Plan is put <br />
on the person’s file, and should be shown to all Support Workers working with that person. <br />
The Intentional Safeguards Plan, along with the Personal Plan, should be present at each <br />
team meeting for that person. <br />
Intentional Safeguard Plans are formally reviewed every 12 months. However, if an incident <br />
form is filled in for this person, it may trigger a review of the Intentional Safeguards Plan. To <br />
this end, the Intentional Safeguards Plan is a living document, subject to evaluation and <br />
review at any time. <br />
Learning Partnerships<br />
If the person you support agrees, it would be great to do this next question with them in their support<br />
time. Together, look at the Intentional Safeguards Plan for that person and talk about how it was put<br />
together, what is on it, why it exists and how you, as a support person, use that plan to keep both of<br />
you safe. Don’t forget to put the Book number and question number on your time/tasksheet. See the<br />
Learners’ Website for the amount of time you can claim.<br />
6. Intentional Safeguard Plan (also known as Risk Management Plans or Risk and Vulnerability Plans)<br />
a: Please describe, in one or two sentences what an intentional safeguards plan is. <br />
An Intentional Safeguard Plan is a plan designed and implemented based on the unique<br />
circumstances of risk or vulnerability of each person. It is intended to reduce the<br />
chance of harm to the person or to others that could result from any risks or<br />
vulnerabilities identified when the plan was set up.<br />
b: Please describe each of the steps in the process used to put together a Community Connections <br />
Intentional Safeguards Plan. <br />
i) Consultation – who is involved? <br />
The person for whom the plan is intended, their family and support network.<br />
iii) Risk Identification - Areas of Vulnerability or Risk are listed in the first section of the Intentional<br />
Safeguards Plan. Pick two areas and for each write a question that you could ask during the<br />
consultation process to find out about how a person might be vulnerable.<br />
E.g. Loss of Dignity - Are there any situations that your family member might find themselves in<br />
where they might look ‘stupid’ or ‘inappropriate’, and that result in them not being treated with<br />
dignity?<br />
Questions are asked about the person’s life and environment with a view to finding any<br />
areas that where there may be risk or vulnerability for the person. Questions are also<br />
asked about what has worked in a positive way in the past and how identified<br />
22
situations can be avoided.<br />
iii) Risk Analysis – how is the level of risk decided on or evaluated? <br />
The level of risk is evaluated using by asking “How likely is it that this situation will<br />
occur?” and “What are the consequences of this situation occurring”? The answer to<br />
these questions determines the level of risk which may be rated ‘crucial’, ‘immediate’,<br />
‘likely’, ‘unlikely’, or ‘remote’.<br />
Verification -‐ Risk Management Strategies: please give the page number and column number of where you <br />
find the risk management strategies on the Intentional Safeguards Plan. <br />
c: Please describe YOUR responsibilities around the Intentional Safeguards Plan. In each of the areas <br />
below. (Complete the sentences.) <br />
i) It is important for me that I know the management strategies around risks for the person I <br />
support because… <br />
It’s important that I know the management strategies around risk for the person I<br />
support because I need to be able to deal with any identified risk or vulnerability<br />
situations that may happen.<br />
ii) It is important for my colleagues that I know the management strategies around risks for the <br />
person I support because… <br />
It’s important for my colleagues that I know the strategies around risk for the person I<br />
support because if the strategy is to be effective we all need to deal with identified risk<br />
or vulnerability situations in the same way.<br />
iii) If I don’t follow the management strategies on the Intentional Safeguards plan, THREE <br />
consequences for the person I support could be: <br />
If I don’t follow the follow the strategies on the Intentional Safeguards Plan there could<br />
be the following consequences;<br />
Lack of continuity of an identified strategy<br />
Confusion for my colleagues and the person supported<br />
Failure of the strategy through lack of consistency<br />
The supported person may be suffer the consequences of if the plan is not followed<br />
The family, friends of the supported person may be at risk if the plan is not followed<br />
Myself or my colleagues may be at risk if the plan is not followed<br />
d: The Intentional Safeguards Plan is a ‘living document’ because it is updated or changed at any time. <br />
What TWO circumstances would result in the Intentional Safeguard Plan being updated.? <br />
Circumstance 1: <br />
The Intentional Safeguards Plan could be updated or changed at the time of a formal<br />
12 monthly plan review.<br />
Circumstance 2: <br />
The Intentional Safeguards Plan could be updated or changed if an incident form was<br />
filled in for the person.<br />
e: How (or when) is the Intentional Safeguards Plan talked about with support staff so that all staff on the <br />
team are aware of the plan? <br />
The Intentional Safeguards Plan is talked about at the monthly catch ups. This means<br />
that even staff who aren’t at the catch ups will still see what was talked about by<br />
reading the catch up notes.<br />
f: Describe how Intentional Safeguard Plans reflect a person-‐centred approach to planning? <br />
You must consider the following in your response: privacy, independence, dignity. <br />
Intentional Safeguard Plans are made up with the person and their network. They are<br />
discussed with the person so that everyone is aware of what is happening (dignity),<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 23
they are signed off by the person (independence) and are only shared with the support<br />
team (privacy).<br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US23389v3: 1.1, 2.1(5b), 2.2 (5c), 2.3 (5d), 2.3 (5e). US28528v1: 2.4<br />
Evidence: The learner must be able to provide the exact location of the Risk Management Strategies on an<br />
Intentional Safeguards plan, thus evidencing they have looked at a plan. The Learner has considered how this<br />
service model of risk management and Community Connections policy applies a person-centred approach in the<br />
context of this support.<br />
Judgement: The process used to develop an Intentional Safeguards Plan within CC is described, as are each of<br />
these components: consultation, risk identification, risk evaluation, risk management strategies, how the plan is<br />
communicated and made known to relevant staff, and two circumstances in which an Intentional Safeguards<br />
Plan would be updated. Further, the Learner has explained the relevance of the Plan for them as a support<br />
person and, through possible consequences, the context in which they are using the Plan. The Learner has<br />
described how ISP supports a person-centred approach to support.<br />
Glossary:<br />
Intentional – Done on purpose; deliberate.<br />
Vulnerable – Open to physical or emotional attack or harm.<br />
Likelihood – The chance of something being likely to happen.<br />
Potential – The capacity to become or develop into something in the future.<br />
Consultation – Have discussions or confer with (someone), typically<br />
before undertaking a course of action.<br />
Implementation – Put (a decision, plan, agreement, etc.) into action.<br />
Eliminate – Completely remove or get rid of (something).<br />
Reduce – Make smaller or less in amount, degree, or size.<br />
Isolate – Cause (a person or place) to be or remain alone or apart from others.<br />
Perceived – Become aware or conscious of (something); come to realize or<br />
understand.<br />
Environment – The surroundings or conditions in which a person, animal, or plant<br />
lives or operates.<br />
Evaluation - The making of a judgment about the amount, number, or value of<br />
something; assessment.<br />
OBSERVING CHANGES<br />
As support staff it is important that we observe any changes being experienced by the <br />
people we support and that we alert our Coordinator to those changes. <br />
Changes may be an indication of a person’s decreasing or increasing physical, mental or <br />
emotional ability to continue with their planned life. <br />
To be able to describe a change, you first need to know what is ‘normal’ for that person. <br />
You can build a ‘normal’ picture by considering the following: <br />
24
• What is their usual state of health? Are they usually fighting fit? Or do they often<br />
come down with flu, colds, aches and pains? Do they have a bad back or other<br />
injury that they have been living with for most or all of their lives?<br />
• What are their personal preferences? Do they have routines they carry out every<br />
day or week? What support do they usually receive? And what is that support for?<br />
• What can they usually do for themselves?<br />
• What is their personal presentation usually like?<br />
It is important that you give feedback to your Coordinator when you observe changes <br />
because changes may mean that support needs to change – either to increase support due <br />
to increased need, or decrease support due to skills gained. Remember, over-‐supporting a <br />
person can have a negative effect on their self-‐esteem and their progress towards <br />
independence. <br />
Note: If you only work with one person, please see the Learners’ Website FAQ page for <br />
suggestions on how to answer the question below. <br />
7. Observing Change<br />
a) Describe how giving feedback to your team around changes for a person you support is <br />
important to making sure that they experience good health and wellbeing. <br />
It is important that I give good feedback because… <br />
…then everyone is one the same page and we all know what is happening. That means<br />
that all the team can provide the support needed at any given time. Especially in times<br />
of change.<br />
Think about TWO people you support where you have observed and provided feedback around <br />
changes in that person’s health or abilities… <br />
b) How did your feedback about the changes contribute towards the support being altered or<br />
adjusted for that person? <br />
Person One: <br />
What Feedback did you give about a change for the person? <br />
I told my Coordinator that the person I support had seen a cat get run over on the<br />
street. The person I support was really upset about it and kept thinking about it and<br />
wondering how the cat was – she was getting quite anxious and stressed.<br />
After my feedback, the support was adjusted in the following way:<br />
The team organised for the person I support to go and talk with the neighbour and ask<br />
how the cat was. It turned out that it was quite hurt, but we talked through it all and<br />
she felt better after that knowing it was being looked after.<br />
Person Two: <br />
What Feedback did you give about a change for the person? <br />
After my feedback, the support was adjusted in the following way:<br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US27459v2: 1.1, 1.2.<br />
Evidence: The Learner has identified TWO supported people where changes in functional or health status have<br />
been reported.<br />
Judgement: The Learner has described how the reporting caused support needs to be better met.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 25
8. Reporting Change<br />
Look back to your answers to Section B in Question 7. Your answers in that question showed how<br />
your feedback to the support team resulted in some changes.<br />
a) Describe in more detail those changes you talked about in Question 7b. Was the person’s health<br />
and wellbeing improved as a result of the changes? If so, how? If not, why not?<br />
Person One: <br />
The person’s wellbeing improved as we did something about the anxiety in that we<br />
supported her to talk to the neighbour about the cat.<br />
Person Two: <br />
b) How might these changes affect that person’s personal plan or the support provided around that <br />
plan? <br />
Impact on Person One’s hours of support or when support is delivered: <br />
It didn’t change the hours of support or when it was delivered. But we did have to<br />
change what we did in that support time for a wee bit until it all went back to normal.<br />
Impact on Person Two’s hours of support or when support is delivered: <br />
Impact on Person One’s support team (both paid and unpaid): <br />
H’s family kept getting phone calls asking if their cat was ok and that it wasn’t on a<br />
street, this was beginning to annoy them. H’s support team needed to get together and<br />
talk about how we were going to deal with the issue, how we were going to calm H<br />
down and get her over the incident.<br />
Impact on Person Two’s support team (both paid and unpaid): <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US27459v2: 1.2, 1.3.<br />
Evidence: The Learner has described a situation of change for TWO supported people. They have described<br />
whether ability was increased or decreased. They have also considered potential impacts that these changes<br />
might have on the persons support and support team (support and support team are considered representative<br />
of the support plan in these circumstances as they provide the basis for actioning the support plan).<br />
Judgement: The Learner has described how the reporting caused support needs to be better met. The impact<br />
of the change has been described, as has the impact on the person’s support plan – via their support hours and<br />
support team.<br />
Observing and Responding to Changes - COORDINATOR VERIFICATION<br />
CCLP Book One <br />
Learner’s Name: <br />
Coordinator Name: <br />
Date: <br />
1. I confirm that this Learner reports changes experienced by people supported according <br />
Community Connections Philosophy and Policy. Yes / No <br />
Example (required): <br />
26
2. I confirm that when reporting changes, observations are non-‐judgemental but provide opinion <br />
as to whether the change is for the better or at the cost of the supported person’s independence. <br />
Yes / No <br />
Example (required): <br />
3. I confirm that in the examples above, the Learner has also offered suggestions around the <br />
impact on the person’s support being provided as per their support plan. Yes / No <br />
Example (required): <br />
4. I confirmed that the Learner observed and reported these changes in a manner that <br />
respected the privacy, mana and relationships of the person supported. Yes / No <br />
Example of respect of privacy (required): <br />
Example of respect of mana (required): <br />
Example of respect of relationships (required): <br />
Additional Comments (optional): <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US274592v2: 2.1.<br />
Evidence: The form is filled in completely!<br />
Judgement: The Coordinator has confirmed and commented sufficiently to establish the Learner<br />
followed Community Connections Policy and Processes in observing and reporting changes, and<br />
that the privacy, mana and relationships of the person supported were protected throughout.<br />
Glossary:<br />
Preferences – Liking one thing more than another.<br />
Routine – Actions regularly followed.<br />
WHAT IS DISABILITY?<br />
There are three ways to think about disability. <br />
MODELS OF DISABIITY <br />
1. The Medical Model. <br />
The medical model of <br />
disability sees disability as an <br />
individual problem. Disability <br />
is some chance, terrible <br />
occurrence that has befallen <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 27
the individual so they are to be pitied and helped. <br />
Support services who work from this model attempt to bring the person with an <br />
impairment to as closely resemble the nondisabled majority as possible, or reduce the <br />
importance of disability on the person’s life. (Hahn, 1989). <br />
This model is also strongly represented in social policy and legislation in New Zealand at <br />
present. We continue to base our support services funding on ‘needs’ assessments – that is, <br />
compared with a ‘normal’ person, what is it the disabled person cannot do because of their <br />
disability. <br />
Eg. The person is not able to move their legs, as such they are in a wheelchair and<br />
that’s why they can’t get in to the shop.<br />
2. The Interactive Model. <br />
The interactive model of disability says that disability is experienced as a result of other <br />
people’s perceptions about the person due to their impairment. <br />
This model suggests that the way to fix the problem of disability is to change the attitudes <br />
of the non-‐disabled. <br />
Another way the problem can be fixed is by changing disabled people so they act, look and <br />
function more like non-‐disabled people – so they’ll be subject to less discrimination. <br />
E.g. the person is in a wheelchair because of impairment around mobility, people<br />
treat this person differently because they see the wheelchair, not the person in it –<br />
and that treatment is the disabling factor.<br />
3. The Social Model <br />
The social model of disability says that disability is imposed by communities who do not <br />
acknowledge those members of society who do not fit in to the ‘norm’. Therefore, people <br />
with impairments are disabled to participate fully in our communities. <br />
E.g . The wheelchair isn’t an issue at all when it comes to getting in to the shop – it’s<br />
the steps leading up to the door that are the problem! That is, the community<br />
building code says it’s acceptable to exclude wheelchair access – and as such, it’s<br />
acceptable to exclude people in our community who are in wheelchairs.<br />
28
The social model asks us to look at disability a bit like sexism, racism, homophobia<br />
etc. Let’s take sexism as an example and apply it to the three models above.<br />
The medical model (designed by men, of course☺) says that women are less simply<br />
because they are women. They are made differently, and are inferior as a result. In<br />
order for women to do better, they must be more like men.<br />
The interactive model means that women are treated differently because they are<br />
perceived as being less able or competent as men. They are perceived that way<br />
because they exist in a world largely planned and designed by men. Therefore, our<br />
first assumption when we see a woman endeavouring to do something that is<br />
understood to be in a ‘man’s domain’ is that she will need help or assistance from<br />
someone else.<br />
The social model says that women will never be treated equally until the environment<br />
and laws, designed by men, are changed to include the variation of women in the<br />
community.<br />
It’s important for us to know about these models of disability as they give us an <br />
understanding of how many of members of our communities see disabiity and people who <br />
they label as ‘disabled’. It gives us an understanding of how to work with members of the <br />
community to help them learn more about the people we support and their rights as <br />
citizens. <br />
Glossary:<br />
Occurance – An incident or event.<br />
Befallen – Something bad that has happened to someone.<br />
Legislation – A collection of laws.<br />
Perception – A way of understanding something.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 29
Discrimination – The unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people<br />
or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex.<br />
Imposed – Force something to be put in place.<br />
HISTORICAL VIEW OF DISABILITY <br />
Once upon a time, many, many years ago, everybody <br />
that survived birth contributed to the wellbeing of their <br />
family and, by extension, their community. This <br />
generally meant that a person worked in some capacity <br />
to provide food etc for their family, with a bit left over <br />
for exchange or commerce. <br />
1750 <br />
Then, around 1750, the Industrial Revolution began. This was a <br />
good time for entrepreneurs. What was previously a manual labour <br />
and draft animal based economy, became machine based <br />
manufacturing (source: www.wikipedia.com). <br />
What this meant in reality, was that instead of a person’s work <br />
needing to cover support for themselves and contribution to <br />
family, they now also needed to cover some profit for the owner of <br />
the factory. <br />
Over the next century, people were judged according to their ability to work and produce <br />
profit for someone else. Employers would dictate what work needed to be done, and would <br />
select the people most likely to generate the most profit for them. Their first choice was <br />
people strong of body and mind. <br />
People regarded as being weak were not considered able to work in this new environment. <br />
They were considered dis-‐abled. <br />
To make things even more difficult, families began to live in bigger towns or cities rather <br />
than hamlets, people went ‘out’ to work, and the care of the young, old and infirm became <br />
an issue. <br />
To this end, disability as a negative condition is considered to be a Social Construct. <br />
A social construct is something that has been created or developed by society. It’s a <br />
perception of a group of people, or an idea, that has been ‘constructed’ through cultural or <br />
social influences. <br />
1850 <br />
By around 1850, society had convinced itself that disabled people <br />
were generally a risk and that it probably wasn’t a good idea for <br />
30
these undesirable genetic strains to be carried through in to later generations. <br />
The answer to this fear was to build institutions to remove the less desirable people from <br />
society. While these were originally planned for people who were ‘dangerously insane’ <br />
many people with a variety of impairments ended up in these institutions. <br />
1911 <br />
In 1911, New Zealand passed the Mental Defectives Act (1911) that <br />
differentiated between people of unsound mind, people who were <br />
mentally infirm, imbeciles, the feeble minded and epileptics. <br />
1925 <br />
In 1925, a committee in to the enquiry of Mental Defectives and Sexual <br />
Offenders made a case for the State having overall control over feeble-minded<br />
persons. <br />
This is from the opening paragraph of their report: <br />
“For a considerable time there has been a growing feeling of anxiety among the public <br />
owing to the number of mental defectives becoming a charge upon the State, and also the <br />
alarming increase in their numbers through the uncontrolled fecundity of this class.” <br />
(REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY APPOINTED BY THE HON. SIR MAUI POMARE, K.B.E., C.M.G., <br />
MINISTER OF HEALTH.1925. Section One, Origin and Scope of Enquiry.) <br />
The feeble minded were also considered a “menace to modern civilisation “: <br />
“The Committee are of opinion that the unrestricted multiplication of feeble-‐minded <br />
members of the community is a most serious menace to the future welfare and happiness of <br />
the Dominion, and it is of the utmost importance that some means of meeting the peril <br />
should be adopted without delay. The position is the more serious because, while the feeble-minded<br />
are extraordinarily prolific, there is a growing tendency among the more intellectual <br />
classes for the birth-‐rate to become restricted.” <br />
(Pomare, 1925.) <br />
Interestingly, movies were a contributing factor to feeble-‐mindedness and sexual proclivity: <br />
“…Other prominent and avoidable handicaps, seriously affecting many children throughout <br />
the Dominion, which ought to receive more serious attention are …(lots of things are listed here <br />
like fresh air and fresh fruit) and last, but not least, the highly injurious practice of frequenting <br />
"picture-‐shows." <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 31
More seriously though, the Committee proposed such things as over-‐riding powers of <br />
supervision: <br />
“In the case of all feeble-‐minded persons living outside institutions, whether with relatives <br />
or otherwise, the State should, in the interest of both such feeble-‐minded individuals and of <br />
society, have the ultimate right of supervision.” <br />
(Section 4) <br />
The Committee proposed people be legally compelled to submit the names of feeble-minded<br />
children for a register: <br />
"Every parent, teacher of a school (either public or private), constable, or officer of a <br />
charitable or kindred institution who is aware of the place of residence (either temporary or <br />
permanent) of a blind, deaf, feeble-‐minded, or epileptic child, and the householder in whose <br />
house any such child resides, shall send notification of the <br />
fact to the Minister, giving name, age, and address of the child.” <br />
(Section 7) <br />
The Committee suggests control over the reproductive rights of feeble minded persons and <br />
the kindness of segregation: <br />
“It is very important that marriages with registered persons should be made illegal, and, as <br />
a corollary to this, that it should be made an indictable offence for any person knowingly to <br />
have carnal knowledge of a registered person.” <br />
(Section 9) <br />
“In the opinion of the Committee it is of the utmost importance that mental defectives <br />
should be prevented from reproducing. <br />
It is altogether wrong to suppose that there is any unkindness in taking the feeble-‐minded, <br />
who are unable to battle for themselves, under the care of the State and preventing them <br />
from bringing forth another generation of defectives. The real unkindness consists in <br />
allowing such unfortunates to be brought into the world.” <br />
(Section 11.) <br />
1929 <br />
Templeton Farm School opened in 1929. It was located outside of <br />
Christchurch and was the first to open following the Mental <br />
Defectives Amendment Bill (1928) that allowed certain institutions to <br />
be dedicated for the care and training of ‘mentally deficient’ children. <br />
1930 <br />
In the 1930’s the Invalid’s and Sickness Benefits were introduced in <br />
New Zealand. <br />
1940 <br />
In the 1940s society became more aware of <br />
Mental Illness and Physical Disability when <br />
32
our returning soldiers came home from World War II. Rehabilitation was emphasised. <br />
Around this time, institutions were built, usually on the rural outskirts of towns (Eg. Lake <br />
Alice, Kimberley, SunnySide, Cherry Farm, Tokanui etc.) These institutions were the <br />
response of a society that genuinely believed they were doing the best for the disabled <br />
members of the community. <br />
In 1949, IHC was started by a small group of parents led by Harold and Margaret Anyon <br />
from Wellington. The Anyons were dissatisfied with the way children with intellectual <br />
disability were treated by health and education professionals and formed the Intellectually <br />
Handicapped Children’s Parents’ Association (IHCPA). (www.ihc.org.nz) <br />
1950 & 1960 <br />
In the 1950s and 1960s more people began to question the <br />
usefulness of the larger institutions. <br />
In the 1960s Sheltered Workshops had been established and <br />
the Disabled Persons Employment Act (1960) was in effect. <br />
This act meant that Sheltered Workshops were exempt from <br />
employment conditions that had to be applied elsewhere. <br />
1970 <br />
In the 1970s, the Government acknowledged the right and <br />
importance for people with disabilities to be part of their <br />
communities. Funding began to be provided for smaller <br />
residential homes (group homes) rather than institutions. <br />
The Industrial Relations Act (1973) allowed a person with an <br />
impairment to work in the open labour market and <br />
Minimum Wage Exemptions are still able to be applied for <br />
and used today. <br />
INCLUSION <br />
1980’s <br />
In the 1980s, de-‐institutionalisation continued, and changes to the Education Act meant <br />
that disabled children could attend ‘normal’ schools. This was often referred to as ‘main <br />
streaming’. <br />
Supported Employment emerged as a recognised support service. <br />
1990’s <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 33
In the early 1990s, Supported Living emerged as a recognised support service. It was unique <br />
in that the funding for the support was individualised and promoted greater choice in the <br />
living situation for the person concerned. <br />
2000’s <br />
In 2001, the New Zealand Disability Strategy was released. The aim of the NZDS is to guide <br />
Government action to promote a more inclusive society. <br />
The NZDS defines disability as follows: <br />
“Disability is not something individuals have. What individuals have are impairments. They <br />
may be physical, sensory, neurological, psychiatric, intellectual or other impairments. <br />
Disability is the process which happens when one group of people create barriers by <br />
designing a world only for their way of living, taking no account of the impairments other <br />
people have.” <br />
The Strategy continues to say: <br />
“Along with other New Zealanders, disabled people aspire to a good <br />
life. However, they also face huge barriers to achieving the life that <br />
so many take for granted. These barriers are created when we build <br />
a society that takes no account of the impairments other people <br />
have. Our society is built in a way that assumes we can all see signs, <br />
read directions, hear announcements, reach buttons, have the <br />
strength to open heavy doors and have stable moods and <br />
perceptions. <br />
Underpinning the NZ Disability Strategy is a vision of a fully inclusive <br />
society. New Zealand will be inclusive when people with <br />
impairments can say they live in: <br />
'A society that highly values our lives and continually enhances our full participation.' <br />
Achieving this vision will involve ensuring that disabled people have a meaningful <br />
partnership with Government, communities and support agencies, based on respect and <br />
equality. Disabled people will be integrated into community life on their own terms, their <br />
abilities will be valued, their diversity and interdependence will be recognised, and their <br />
human rights will be protected. Achieving this vision will also involve recognising the <br />
principles of the Treaty of Waitangi.” <br />
2008 <br />
In 2008, NZ ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with <br />
Disabilities. <br />
Taken from Office for Disability Issues Website (http://www.odi.govt.nz/what-‐we-‐do/un-convention/):<br />
<br />
34
All new legislation and policy should be consistent with the Convention, or New Zealand will <br />
be in breach of its obligations and subject to criticism by the United Nations Committee on <br />
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. <br />
Government agencies will find the specific measures of the Convention useful to analyse and <br />
improve, where necessary, the current mechanisms for implementing policy that impacts on <br />
disabled people. It will also help to ensure that mainstream services are inclusive of disabled <br />
people and delivered in non-‐discriminatory ways. <br />
Like the New Zealand Disability Strategy, the Convention covers all areas of life, all ages and <br />
life stages. In doing so, it has obligations on government and the private sector. However, it <br />
is the government that is accountable to the United Nations, and government agencies <br />
need to take leadership in encouraging action by the private sector. <br />
As an international legal framework, the Convention is able to be referred to by Courts in <br />
their decision making, where appropriate. <br />
Article 19 of the United Nation Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is most <br />
important to us at Community Connections. This section talks about living independently <br />
and being included in the community. <br />
Article 19 - Living independently and being included in the community<br />
States Parties to the present Convention recognize the equal right of all persons<br />
with disabilities to live in the community, with choices equal to others, and shall take<br />
effective and appropriate measures to facilitate full enjoyment by persons with<br />
disabilities of this right and their full inclusion and participation in the community,<br />
including by ensuring that:<br />
a) Persons with disabilities have the opportunity to choose their place of residence<br />
and where and with whom they live on an equal basis with others<br />
and are not obliged to live in a particular living arrangement;<br />
b) Persons with disabilities have access to a range of in-home, residential and other<br />
community support services, including personal assistance necessary to support<br />
living and inclusion in the community, and to prevent isolation or segregation from<br />
the community;<br />
c) Community services and facilities for the general population are available on an<br />
equal basis to persons with disabilities and are responsive to their needs.<br />
2012 <br />
NETWORKS <br />
One of the most natural and effective ways of <br />
promoting active participation in communities is the <br />
use of Networks. <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 35
Very generally, Networks are a group of people (usually nine people) experiencing disability <br />
who live in the same geographical area and who support each other using their combined <br />
strengths and gifts. <br />
Community Connections presently supports a Network in Palmerston North. <br />
Here is a brief summary of Networks from Neighbourhood Networks in Scotland – the <br />
organisation who have been Mentoring Community Connections in getting the PN Network <br />
up and running. <br />
“A Network is normally made up of around 9 people. We refer to those people as Network <br />
members. Those members may have a learning disability, physical disability, mental health <br />
issue, or other support need. All of those members will live within the same community and <br />
within a reasonable distance of one and other. <br />
Neighbourhood Networks will then recruit a member of staff, we call this person the <br />
Community Living Worker. This person will also live in the same community as the Network. <br />
we hope that this will mean that the Community Living Worker will come with a good sound <br />
knowledge of that comunity and the resources that are available in and around it. <br />
The purpose of the Network is to bring out the skills and strengths of the individual <br />
members in each Network and encourage those people to use those skills to help others in <br />
the Network, encouraging mutual support amongst all members. <br />
The Network and its Community Living Worker should also be a way of members connecting <br />
with their own community, which will in turn increase their circle of friends, increase their <br />
own skills, ensure they are less isolated, and hopefully narrow the divide between people <br />
who receive services and other people in the community.” <br />
Source: Neighbourhood Networks website: http://www.neighbourhoodnetworks.org/ <br />
9. Values and Attitudes of Society.<br />
1a) From the learning material (under the heading of Historical View of Disability), pick ONE era and <br />
describe how society thought of disabled people at that time. That is, what were society’s values <br />
and attitudes towards disabled people in that era? <br />
Note: Your answer needs to have enough detail that your Assessor can tell that you have a good <br />
understanding of disability in that era. <br />
Era: <br />
Values and Attitudes: <br />
1b) Describe the impact that the values and attitudes you talked about in 1a had on people with <br />
disabilities in that era. <br />
Impact: <br />
1c) Describe the values and attitudes of society towards disabled people today. <br />
Values and Attitudes: <br />
1d) What impact do those values and attitudes (that you described in 1c) have on people with disabilities <br />
today. <br />
Impact: <br />
36
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28523v1: 1.1, 1.2<br />
Evidence: The Learner has described the values and attitudes of society towards disable people from both an<br />
historic and current perspective.<br />
Judgement: The learner described the impact that these values and attitudes have on persons with a disability.<br />
VALUES AND ATTITUDES IN THE<br />
WORKPLACE<br />
Community Connections also has a Code of Conduct. <br />
This will have been sent to you, along with your Staff Handbook, when you were first <br />
employed by Community Connections. <br />
The Code of Conduct gives you very clear guidelines around how Community Connections <br />
expects you to behave both in the homes of the people you support as well as out in the <br />
Community. At all times, you are a representative of Community Connections and it is <br />
important that your professionalism reflects good practice. <br />
The Harrassement policy gives you a clear understanding of what is considered harassment <br />
and how to deal with it if you encounter it. <br />
From the Harassment Policy: <br />
Community Connections is committed to promoting positive and respectful <br />
interpersonal relationships. Harassment in any form is unacceptable behaviour that will <br />
not be tolerated under any circumstances. Community Connections do not condone the <br />
harassment of any employee by either another employee or client, or the harassment of <br />
client by staff. <br />
The workplace is to be free from harassment and intimidation. Where harassment is <br />
found to have occurred Community Connections will take action that is deemed <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 37
appropriate to the circumstances and will act to ensure that the behaviour is stopped <br />
immediately. <br />
Some forms of harassment are obvious and constitute serious crimes, others are<br />
subtler, although serious and breach Community Connections values such as the<br />
commitment to treat colleagues and clients with the respect and courtesy to which they<br />
are entitled.<br />
All complaints of harassment will be treated seriously, sympathetically and <br />
confidentially. <br />
Where harassment is occurring outside the workplace and not necessarily by another <br />
staff member or Client, and this is impacting on the staff member’s ability to perform <br />
their work satisfactorily and securely, Community Connections will support that <br />
employee with information and procedures to take appropriate action. <br />
If the unwelcome behaviour or harassment is physical, Community Connections has ‘Break <br />
Away’ training that happens alongside the Behaviour Experienced as Challenging training <br />
(also referred to as Proactive Responses). The Break Away training will give you some skills <br />
to help you handle such situations. You will automatically receive this training within 12 <br />
months of starting with Community Connections, but it may be that you need to be <br />
included on this training sooner due to your circumstances. <br />
Harassment is unprofessional and unethical and impacts on each person in different ways, <br />
so if you are experiencing unwelcome or offensive behaviour in the workplace (in any form) <br />
either from a person you are supporting, or from a colleague PLEASE TALK TO SOMEONE <br />
ABOUT IT. <br />
Let someone know how it is bothering you, and seek assistance. <br />
Go to the Internal Website and read the Code of Conduct and also the <br />
Harrassement Policy. <br />
10. Acting Professionally and Ethically in the Workplace.<br />
a: Please describe TWO types of harassment that you might experience as a support worker (please make it <br />
clear whether this is from a person you support, or a colleague). <br />
Harassment 1: <br />
I might experience ongoing ‘put down’ behaviour from a colleague.<br />
Harassment 2: <br />
I might experience physical abuse from a person I support<br />
b: What impact would each of the forms of harassment above have on you? <br />
The impact of harassment 1 on me would be… <br />
I would feel angry, offended and demoralised.<br />
38
The impact of harassment 2 on me would be… <br />
I would be frightened, upset and worried about the situation.<br />
c: Describe two responses to unwelcome or offensive behaviour the Harassment Policy says you can make <br />
that will help you protect your own well-‐being. <br />
Note: Please make it clear whether the response is to harassment from a colleague or from a person you <br />
support. <br />
Response 1: <br />
I would tell the colleague in private that his/her behavior is offensive and that I wanted<br />
him/her to stop<br />
Verification – Please quote from the Harassment Policy to support your answer above: <br />
Some people may feel able to deal with the problem themselves. This allows the person<br />
or staff member to remain in control of the process, keeps the problem at a local level<br />
and may stop the offending behaviour. In this case you may choose the following<br />
process or another that works for you.<br />
If you are the person being harassed tell the other person, in private, that his/her<br />
behaviour is offensive and request him/her to stop.<br />
Write to the person, advising that a complaint may be made if the behaviour does not<br />
stop. (Such a letter must be sealed and marked ‘Personal & Confidential’)<br />
Speak to the person in the company of a support person/representative<br />
Source: Community Connections Harassment Policy page (?)<br />
Response 2: <br />
Ask my coordinator or service manager for support and advice about the situation of<br />
physical abuse from the person I support.<br />
Verification – Please quote from the Harassment Policy to support your answer above: <br />
If you require support:<br />
The following people can provide advice, assistance and support where you feel that<br />
you are or have been harassed or you are concerned about the language or attitude of<br />
an individual:<br />
A staff peer<br />
Co-ordinator<br />
Service Managers/General Manager<br />
Executive Director<br />
Source: Community Connections Harassment Policy page?<br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 3.3<br />
Evidence: The learner has quoted accurately from the CC Harassment Policy to indicate they have read it.<br />
Judgement: The learner has described the process used within Community Connections for ethical (and<br />
professional) disputes and grievances.<br />
Glossary:<br />
Representative – someone who speaks, or stands up, for another person or group<br />
of people.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 39
Automatically – happening as part of the normal process or system.<br />
Offensive – having feelings hurt due to rudeness or lack of respect.<br />
CONFIDENTIALITY (PRIVACY)<br />
Confidentiality is VERY important in your role as a Support Worker. From what you’ve <br />
learnt so far, you will see that it is part of the Code of Rights, it is in your Employment <br />
Contract, it features in the Staff Handbook, is in the Code of Conduct and also has its own <br />
policy (Privacy Act Guidelines). <br />
Please have a look at each of the documents in the question below. If you <br />
have already read them, then quickly read them again. As you go through <br />
them, highlight the bits that relate to confidentiality. <br />
11. Confidentiality (Privacy)<br />
For each of the documents below, describe the role of confidentiality. <br />
a) Code of Rights: What does the Code of Rights say people we support are entitled to around <br />
privacy? <br />
The Code of Rights says that people we support have the right to have their privacy<br />
respected.<br />
Verification -‐ Please quote from Code of Rights to support your answer: <br />
RIGHT 1<br />
Right to be Treated with Respect<br />
1) Every consumer has the right to be treated with respect.<br />
2) Every consumer has the right to have his or her privacy respected.<br />
The HDC Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights Regulation<br />
1996<br />
b) Employment Agreement: What have you agreed to around confidentiality when you signed your <br />
Employment Agreement? <br />
I agreed not to share any information about the people I support, their family or any<br />
commercially sensitive information about Community Connections.<br />
Verification -‐ Please quote from Employment Agreement to support your answer: <br />
c) Code of Conduct: What classification does the Code of Conduct put for breaking confidentiality: <br />
misconduct, serious misconduct or conduct detrimental to the best interests of Community <br />
Connections? <br />
Serious Misconduct.<br />
ci) Code of Conduct: What is likely to happen if you break confidentiality? <br />
If I were to break confidentiality the Code of Conduct states that the disclosure to<br />
40
unauthorized persons of any confidential information concerning clients, employees,<br />
trustees, or Community Connections Trust Board, would be treated as serious<br />
misconduct.<br />
Verification -‐ Please quote from Code of Conduct to support your answer: <br />
d) Privacy Act Guidelines Policy: What does this policy say about the only time that Community <br />
Connections (not you!) can share information without a person’s permission? <br />
The Privacy Act Guideline policy states that the only time Community Connections can<br />
share information without a supported person’s permission would be if there was<br />
reason to believe that not to do so would cause harm to the person supported or to<br />
others.<br />
Verification -‐ Please quote from Privacy Act Guidelines to support your answer: <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: n/a<br />
Evidence: The learner has quoted accurately from the CC Policies to indicate they have been read and<br />
understood.<br />
Judgement: n/a<br />
CC Desired Outcome:<br />
The Support Worker has a very good understanding of the importance of confidentiality, and the<br />
consequences of not respecting confidentiality.<br />
TIME MANAGEMENT<br />
As a Support Worker, you are required to work independently. Community Connections <br />
places trust in you that you will carry out your work honestly. <br />
This means that you need to think about your time management. <br />
Community Connections expects that you will: <br />
1. Keep a diary so that you know when you are required to provide <br />
support and when to attend meetings. <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 41
2. Also note in your diary when timesheets and other paperwork is due. <br />
3. Allow time at the end of each support session to fill in your timesheet and any other <br />
paperwork required. <br />
4. LOOK in your diary frequently to remind you where you have to be, and when you <br />
need to be there. <br />
5. Plan ahead, plan for the unexpected. If you have a hectic life where things often <br />
change, make sure you plan for that when you’re sorting out your diary. <br />
6. Do things when you say you will do them. If you can’t, then you need <br />
to give adequate warning to the people who will be affected by you <br />
not completing the task or being at the meeting etc. <br />
7. Arrive to carry out your support on time (not a few minutes late), and <br />
leave on time (not a few minutes early) ☺ <br />
8. Manage interruptions. If something comes up when you are providing support to a <br />
person or in a meeting, ask yourself the question: “Can this wait until I’ve finished <br />
what I’m doing?” <br />
9. Set goals for what you have to achieve each day or week, and work to them. <br />
10. PRIORITISE. Being able to prioritise is very important. If you don’t prioritise you may <br />
feel that you’re working really hard, but achieving very little, which is a horrible <br />
feeling. # <br />
A person called Stephen Covey developed a model called the Urgent/Important Matrix. <br />
Here is a picture of it. <br />
42
Urgent and Important <br />
Critical activities might be a result of things you’ve left to the last minute, or things that you <br />
couldn’t have foreseen. Make sure you try and plan for unforeseen activities by allowing <br />
time for them, also avoiding procrastinating will help you avoid the other critical activities. <br />
Urgent and Not Important <br />
Interruptions usually come from other people. They prevent you from achieving your goal. <br />
Ask yourself if they can be rescheduled or if someone else can or should be doing them. <br />
Not Urgent, but Important <br />
Important goals are important! Make sure you allow the time you need to do them <br />
properly so they don’t become urgent. Remember to allow time for unforeseen events. <br />
Not Urgent and Not Important <br />
Distractions should be avoided where possible. Practice being assertive and saying ‘no’! <br />
Please print out the time management form from the ??? and get your <br />
Coordinator to sign it off. <br />
Time Management Coordinator Verification Form<br />
TIME MANAGEMENT VERIFICATION – to be completed by Coordinator <br />
I confirm that this learner is consistently: <br />
1. On time for support sessions: Yes / No <br />
Please provide date of catchup notes where you have checked with the person being supported that this <br />
learner is consistently on time for their support. <br />
2. On time for Coaching: Yes / No <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 43
3. Comes prepared for Coaching: Yes / No <br />
4. Is on time for learning events: Yes / No <br />
5. Is on time for team meetings: Yes / No <br />
6. Comes prepared to participate in team meetings: Yes / No <br />
7. Is on time for other appointments in their work. <br />
Any other comments: <br />
Glossary:<br />
Frequently – happening often.<br />
Hectic – full of activity, or very busy and fast.<br />
Adequate – enough for a particular purpose.<br />
Interruptions – an occasion when something or someone stops something<br />
happening for a short time.<br />
Prioritise – to decide which of a group of things are the most important so you can<br />
deal with them first.<br />
ETHICS<br />
Ethics are the rule of conduct or moral principles within which we practice. <br />
It would be easy to say that behaving ethically is doing what is ‘right’, but it’s a little more <br />
complicated than that – because what is considered right by one person, may not be <br />
considered right by another. <br />
There are several parts that contribute towards ethics. <br />
The first is our own values and attitudes. <br />
44
Our values are what we think of things, they are a reflection of how we think things ought <br />
to be, or how people ought to behave. They reflect our beliefs and our personal morals. <br />
Our attitudes are the ways that we respond to people or situations based on our values and <br />
beliefs. Our behaviour can reflect our attitude. <br />
Our inherent 1 values tend not to change, however our attitudes may change as we move <br />
through life and are exposed to different situations. <br />
A simple example:<br />
As a young person, two of Joan’s values are that each person deserves to live a life<br />
that fulfils them and makes them happy, and that marriage is a lifelong commitment.<br />
Her attitude is that these two values are extremely compatible.<br />
However, as she moves through her life, she begins to see that in some cases, the<br />
two values are actually highly incompatible.<br />
As an older person, Joan still believes that each person deserves to be happy and<br />
that marriage is a commitment, but her attitude has changed:<br />
She now accepts that, even with the best of intentions, some marriages are not<br />
going to work out. Where before she didn’t agree with divorce, she now feels it is<br />
appropriate in some circumstances in order for the people involved to be happy.<br />
Or<br />
She now accepts that, sad though it may be, not everyone can be fully happy. If<br />
marriages are less than happy, then people need to make the best of what they<br />
have, for divorce is not an acceptable option.<br />
We are able to modify our behaviour so that it doesn’t reflect our beliefs and values, and <br />
sometimes our work asks us to do this. <br />
12. Values<br />
Think about and describe THREE values that are important to you. <br />
For each of those values: <br />
i) Describe a situation where this value might cause conflict with someone else. <br />
ii) Describe how your relationship with that person would change for the worse if you reacted badly <br />
to the conflict. <br />
iii) Describe TWO strategies you could use to make sure that you stay non-‐judgemental about the <br />
conflict. <br />
The conflict could be with a person you support, their family/whanau/support network or a <br />
colleague. <br />
An example of a conflict could be: the person held a view that you did not agree with, took an <br />
action you did not agree with, or made a choice you did not agree with. <br />
1 Inherent – existing in someone or something as a permanent part.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 45
Examples of strategies could incude: body language, tone of voice, facial expressions, language used <br />
etc. <br />
Example:<br />
Value: I do not drink Alcohol.<br />
This value is important to me because: I like to look after my body and I don’t think alcohol is very good for my<br />
health.<br />
A situation where this value might cause conflict with someone else is: My workmates like to go out for a drink<br />
after work and keep asking me to come with them even though I don’t drink.<br />
If I react badly to this conflict, the situation could change for the worse in this way: They might get upset and<br />
think that I was judging them for drinking. They might stop being friendly to me at work because they think I don’t<br />
want to be friends with them because I keep refusing to go out with them.<br />
One strategy I could use to stay non-judgemental is: to explain to them that I don’t drink, but that I would like to<br />
come if they are ok with me just drinking fruit juice!<br />
A second strategy I could use to stay non-judgemental is: to suggest another social activity that we could all do.<br />
PLEASE USE THE LAYOUT OF THE EXAMPLE ABOVE WHEN YOU ARE ANSWERING THIS QUESTION. <br />
a) Value One: <br />
I am accepting of the fact that people in the community have a variety of sexual<br />
orientations.<br />
This value is important to me because: <br />
This value is important to me because I have colleagues and friends in same-sex<br />
relationships.<br />
A situation where this value might cause conflict with someone else is: <br />
A person I support has extreme anti-gay feelings and opinions.<br />
If I react badly to this conflict, the situation could change for the worse in this way: <br />
If I were to express my opinion the person might get upset or annoyed and ask for<br />
another support worker.<br />
One strategy I could use to stay non-‐judgemental is: <br />
One strategy I could use is to accept the situation as I can’t afford to jeopardise my job<br />
should the person I support react badly to my viewpoint.<br />
A second strategy I could use to stay non-‐judgemental is: <br />
Another strategy would be to talk to a trusted workmate or my coordinator so that I<br />
could air my feelings about the situation.<br />
b) Value Two: <br />
This value is important to me because: <br />
A situation where this value might cause conflict with someone else is: <br />
If I react badly to this conflict, the situation could change for the worse in this way: <br />
One strategy I could use to stay non-‐judgemental is: <br />
A second strategy I could use to stay non-‐judgemental is: <br />
c) Value Three: <br />
This value is important to me because: <br />
46
A situation where this value might cause conflict with someone else is: <br />
If I react badly to this conflict, the situation could change for the worse in this way: <br />
One strategy I could use to stay non-‐judgemental is: <br />
A second strategy I could use to stay non-‐judgemental is: <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3<br />
Evidence: Three personal values have been identified, three potential effects on work-related relationship due<br />
to a values conflict have been identified, six strategies for modifying personal behaviour have been identified.<br />
Judgement: The learner has met the above evidential requirements and explained the significance of the values<br />
they have identified. The three scenarious have been described within the context of conflict, and the strategies<br />
described promote positive experiences for the supported person and their family/whanau.<br />
The second part that contributes towards Ethics is the values and <br />
attitudes of our workplace <br />
(as a representative of our professional sector). <br />
Community Connections’ Code of Ethics is found in our Staff Handbook. You will have <br />
already read it, but please have another look at it now. <br />
Read Community Connections Ethics Policy. <br />
Community Connections Ethics are: <br />
1. Respect for individual story<br />
2. Achievement of well being in the total sense<br />
3. Maintenance of trust, confidence and integrity<br />
4. Confidentiality<br />
5. Justice, fairness and equity.<br />
6. The commitment to communicate with people in a way that fits with their personal<br />
communication style.<br />
Learning Partnerships<br />
IF THE PERSON YOU SUPPORT AGREES, THIS NEXT QUESTION CAN BE COMPLETED IN<br />
YOUR SUPPORT TIME.<br />
If the person you support agrees, you could do the next question in support time. Talk together about<br />
Community Connections ethics policy and discuss examples of times when you have supported<br />
ethical principles while you have been supporting that person.<br />
Don’t forget to put your conversation and learning on your time/tasksheet – note the topic and<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 47
question number. See the Learners’ Website for the amount of time you can claim.<br />
13. Community Connections’ Ethics<br />
a) Please pick two of the 6 principles of Community Connections Ethics. <br />
Describe in your own words what the principle means for you in your role as a support person. <br />
AND <br />
Give an example of how you have behaved in a way that supports that ethical principal. <br />
1) Ethical Principle: <br />
Maintenance of trust, confidence and integrity<br />
Example of supporting that principal: <br />
In my role as a support worker this principle means that I must be aware that my<br />
values affect my professional decisions and take responsibility for my decisions and<br />
actions. It also means that am committed to learning, to ongoing communication with<br />
people with disabilities and to creating partnerships with vulnerable people.<br />
An example of how I support this principle is that I strive to critically examine the<br />
decisions I make that will affect the people I support. I take advantage of opportunities<br />
to learn about my job and so improve my practice. I listen to what the people I support<br />
tell me about their needs and experience of disability and how they feel about the<br />
quality of my support.<br />
2) Ethical Principle: <br />
Justice, fairness and equity<br />
Example of supporting that principal: <br />
In my role as a support worker this principle means that I support people to access<br />
community resources they want or need to use and to express their civil or legal rights<br />
and responsibilities. I should act as an advocate in some circumstances and support<br />
people to self-advocate where possible.<br />
b) Describe how applying a person-‐centred approach to planning is supported by Community <br />
Connections’ ethic? <br />
(That is, when Community Connections is acting ethically, how are we also applying a person-centred<br />
approach to planning?) <br />
When we consider choice, individuality, respect, confidentiality etc in our planning, we<br />
are also following ethical principles of trust, justice, fairness etc.<br />
A learner response:<br />
By using a person centred approach to planning we can follow the aims and aspirations of the<br />
supported person. The supported person is the expert on their own life and past history and is the<br />
best person to decide which road to take on their journey into the future. The ethics of Community<br />
Connections are:<br />
ETHICS<br />
The core principles are:<br />
• Respect for person’s right to make decisions on their own behalf<br />
• Promoting the interests of another (beneficence)<br />
• Protecting them from harm (non-maleficence)<br />
• Protecting and supporting the most vulnerable<br />
Source:Code of Ethics for Community Connections. (Adapted from J. Taylor, 2000 & P. Boyles<br />
2002)Staff Handbook Page 16<br />
48
T hese Core principles are geared toward the supported persons right to chose and decide on the<br />
direction they should take and with support that understands their aspirations.✓<br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 1.2, US28528v1: 2.4.<br />
Evidence: Three Community Connections ethical principles have been identified and examples of practical<br />
application in the workplace have been given. The Learner has considered how Community Connections ethics<br />
also support a person-centred approach to support.<br />
Judgement: The learner has named ethical principles from Community Connections policy and described what<br />
those prinicples ‘look like’ in the context of support work. The Learner has described how ethics support a<br />
person-centred approach to support.<br />
The third part is the dominant values and attitudes of our society. <br />
Perhaps the best representation of these values and attitudes is the United Nations <br />
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This is a document that NZ signed up <br />
to in 2008 and underpins all policy and practicing standards in New Zealand. <br />
Go to the learner’s website and, using the Documents menu item, click <br />
on the link that takes you to the easy read version of the UN <br />
Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Read through that <br />
document. <br />
(You can also access the document through the website http://www.odi.govt.nz/) <br />
14. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.<br />
a) Describe in your own words TWO principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with <br />
Disabilities. (Choose from between points 5 to 30 on the easy read version) <br />
Example:<br />
Principle One: Being involved in politics. – People with disabilities should be able to vote and stand for<br />
parliament if they want to. They should be able to be represent themselves on boards and in organisations<br />
where they have an interest – either due to their disability or their own personal interest.<br />
PLEASE USE THE LAYOUT OF THE EXAMPLE ABOVE WHEN YOU ARE ANSWERING THIS QUESTION. <br />
Principle One: <br />
Respect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make one's<br />
own choices and independence of persons.<br />
Principle Two: <br />
Respect for difference and acceptance of persons with disabilities as part of human<br />
diversity and humanity.<br />
b) Using the principles that you identified in part (a) of this question, give TWO social values based<br />
on each principle. . That is, what values does our society hold that resulted in those principles<br />
becoming part of the UN Convention of the Rights of People with Disabilities.<br />
Note: you should end up with 4 values in total. See the example if you’re a bit confused!<br />
Example:<br />
Being involved in Politics / Value One – Democracy. NZ is a democratic country which means that all the<br />
people of NZ should be able to elect politicians who represent them and understand their needs. Disabled<br />
people have the right to have put forward and elect people who truly represent their living experience.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 49
PLEASE USE THE LAYOUT OF THE EXAMPLE ABOVE WHEN YOU ARE ANSWERING THIS QUESTION. <br />
Principle One / Value One: <br />
It is recognized and widely accepted in New Zealand Society that people should be have<br />
the freedom to make their own life decisions.<br />
Principle One / Value Two: <br />
It is recognized and widely accepted in New Zealand Society that people have the right<br />
to be respected and be treated ethically.<br />
Principle Two / Value One: <br />
That we are all unique and different in many ways and that this is a positive attribute<br />
to be valued in New Zealand society.<br />
Principle Two / Value Two: <br />
That people who identify as having a disability have the same rights and entitlements<br />
in New Zealand society as people without disability.<br />
c) Describe a time when you worked in a way that supported each of the two principles you listed in <br />
9a. <br />
Example:<br />
Being Involved in Politics: At the last elections I supported the people I work with to watch the DVD about voting<br />
so that they would know how the process works and what to do when they got to the polling booth. I also helped<br />
with organising transport for people to get to the voting stations.<br />
Principle One – Example: <br />
In my work I follow a supported person’s Support Plan because this sets out how I am<br />
to support the person so that they maintain as much independence in their life as<br />
possible.<br />
Principle Two – Example: <br />
In my work I try to remove barriers to participation in the community that people I<br />
support may face. This is because it is my personal value and a core Community<br />
Connections principle that difference should not be a barrier to being full and<br />
functioning community members.<br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 3.1, 3.2<br />
Evidence: Two principles from the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and two values that<br />
underpin each principle have been named. The Learner has provided examples of how they have practiced the<br />
principles in their work.<br />
Judgement: The learner has provided sufficient detail in describing the values and their application in the<br />
workplace to establish good knowledge of the UNCRD and the connection between theory and practice.<br />
Note to Moderator (Lisa!): The Coordinator will be able to access the form below from the Community <br />
Connections Internal Website. They then fill it out and submit the form. When they do that, a document will <br />
be created and made available to the assessors. This will then be saved to the Learner’s file as verification. For <br />
a sample of the finished form, please see the end of this document. Thanks, Dee. <br />
Ethical and Professional Behaviour Coordinator Verification Form:<br />
ETHICAL BEHAVIOUR VERIFICATION FORM: <br />
It is the Coordinator’s responsibility to fill in this form fully and send it to the CCLP <br />
Assessors. <br />
I confirm that this learner demonstrates professional and ethical behaviour according to <br />
the standards below: <br />
1. Works within the specifications and boundaries of their role YES / NO (circle one) <br />
50
Please provide a specific comment that supports your answer above: <br />
2. Behaves professionally and ethically in all work activities. YES / NO (circle one) <br />
Please provide a specific comment that supports your answer above: <br />
3. Behaves professionally and ethically in their interactions with others. YES / NO (circle <br />
one) <br />
Please provide a specific comment that supports your answer above: <br />
4. Addresses ethical issues, grievances and/or disputes according to Community<br />
Connections policy and procedure. YES / NO (circle one)<br />
Please provide a specific comment that supports your answer above: <br />
5. Maintains professional, cultural and age-appropriate physical, emotional, sexual and<br />
spiritual boundaries at all times. YES / NO (circle one)<br />
Please provide a specific comment that supports your answer above: <br />
6. Works within relevant legislation and/or Community Connections policies and procedures<br />
at all times. YES / NO (circle one)<br />
Please provide a specific comment that supports your answer above: <br />
Coordinator Name: <br />
Coordinator Signature: <br />
Date: <br />
When you have completed and signed this form, please scan it to: assessors@ccslt.org.nz <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4.<br />
Evidence: Coordinator (Verifier) has confirmed that the learner is observed as working professionally and<br />
ethically – and according to Community Connections Policies and Procedures. The Coordinator has also<br />
confirmed that the learner is observed as using appropriate processes around ethical issues that arise and also<br />
that the learner is observed to be maintaining professional and ethical boundaries.<br />
Judgement: The verifier has provided sufficient detail in their comments as to establish confidence in the eficacy<br />
of the observations.<br />
15. Ethical Responsibilities to Others<br />
Think about all the documents you’ve read so far (e.g. Code of Rights, UN Convention on the Rights <br />
of Persons with Disabilities, Code of Conduct, Your Employment Agreement, Privacy Act etc). <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 51
Give an example of an ethical responsibility you have to each of the people or groups listed below. <br />
(So that’s 4 examples in total!) <br />
Example:<br />
The People I Support: When I am supporting people to be able to vote at the elections, I need to be very clear<br />
about not influencing them with my own views on politics. I need to be able to talk with them and answer<br />
questions they may have, but I have to make sure that I am supporting them to sort out their own opinions and<br />
vote according to them – not vote how they think I might want them to vote.<br />
6. Conflict of Interest<br />
Conflict of interest is when your own interests compromise or appear to compromise your work or<br />
responsibilities for Community Connections. It is essential you have integrity and remain impartial in any<br />
situation where conflict of interest may arise.<br />
Source: Community Connections Code of Conduct. Point 6, page 5.<br />
The Community: <br />
An ethical responsibility I have to the community is that as part of my support worker<br />
role I should work to raise awareness of people with disabilities and their right to<br />
respect and dignity.<br />
Verification – Quote from Policy or Legislation to support your answer above: <br />
The Person or People you Support: <br />
An ethical responsibility I have to the community is that as part of my support worker<br />
role I should work to ensure that the people I support are treated as individuals and<br />
have the rights that people without disability consider to be their entitlement.<br />
An ethical responsibility I have to the community is that as part of my support worker<br />
role I should support people to access their physical environment, transportation,<br />
information, services and facilities provided to the general public.<br />
Verification – Quote from Policy or Legislation to support your answer above: <br />
Your Colleagues: <br />
An ethical responsibility I have to my colleagues is to make sure that something I do or<br />
fail to do, does not cause harm to my workmates. An example of this would be a failure<br />
to report a potential workplace hazard and a co-worker being injured as a result.<br />
Verification – Quote from Policy or Legislation to support your answer above: <br />
Yourself: <br />
An ethical responsibility I have is to not compromise myself and damage Community<br />
Connections reputation, by taking gifts from a person I support or from their family<br />
members.<br />
Verification – Quote from Policy or Legislation to support your answer above: <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 1.3.<br />
Evidence: The Learner has identified ethical responsibilities that have to: the community, the person they<br />
support, their colleagues and themselves. Each response is supported by quotes from Legislative documents or<br />
Community Connections policy.<br />
Judgement: The Learner has described the ethical responsibilities and provided sufficient verification as to in<br />
establish responsibilties in accordance with legislation, policies or procedures.<br />
52
Glossary:<br />
Complicated – difficult to understand.<br />
Contribute – to give something, in order to achieve something together with other<br />
people.<br />
Inherent – A natural or basic part of something.<br />
Modify – To change something, usually to improve it.<br />
Underpins – To give support, strength or basic structure to something.<br />
Dominant – more important or noticeable than anything else of the same type.<br />
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND<br />
HEALTH<br />
Occupational safety and health (OSH) is about keeping yourself safe in your workplace. <br />
Much of our OSH considerations are based on The Health and Safety in Employment Act <br />
1992 (HSE Act) as this is the law that covers your safety at work. <br />
The HSE Act, like the Health and Disability Commissioner Act (Code of Rights), has duties <br />
and rights. <br />
The HSE Act is quite long and involved, but a good place to find it explained is at this <br />
website address: <br />
http://www.osh.govt.nz/order/catalogue/hseact-‐text/index.shtml <br />
Meanwhile, here is an excerpt from a summary of the Health and Safety in Employment Act <br />
1992 that can be found on the NZ Government Occupational Safety and Health website. <br />
The object of the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992 (the Act) is to prevent harm to <br />
all people at work and people in the vicinity of a place of work. To do this, the Act: <br />
promotes excellence in health and safety management <br />
defines harm and hazards in a comprehensive way <br />
imposes duties on those who are responsible for work, or do work <br />
sets requirements that relate to taking all practicable steps to ensure health and safety, <br />
and that are flexible to cover different circumstances <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 53
equires employee participation in health and safety management and that the process is <br />
conducted in good faith by all those involved. <br />
The Act creates duties for most people connected with places of work including: <br />
employers <br />
employees (including trainees, people gaining work experience and volunteers) <br />
the self-‐employed <br />
principals to contractors <br />
persons who control a place of work <br />
hirers, sellers and suppliers of plant. <br />
Regulations (Section 21) <br />
Regulations are promulgated from time to time under the Act. Regulations may, among <br />
other things, impose duties on employers, employees, designers, manufacturers and others <br />
relating to health and safety. These regulations may apply with respect to places of work, <br />
plant, processes or substances, and may deal with particular problems that have arisen. <br />
The Health and Safety in Employment Regulations 1995 require the provision of facilities <br />
such as toilets, first aid, for employees to wash, a place to have meals and the provision of <br />
wholesome and sufficient drinking water. The regulations also set a range of general health <br />
and safety and welfare requirements in addition to the Act, including: <br />
restricting young people from certain hazardous work and times of work <br />
requiring certification of workers using some hazardous equipment <br />
requiring notification of particular types of hazardous work, including forestry and <br />
construction <br />
creating duties for the designers, manufacturers and suppliers of plant and protective <br />
clothing and equipment. <br />
The Health and Safety in Employment (Pressure Equipment, Cranes, and Passenger <br />
Ropeways) Regulations 1999 describe a system of design verification and inspection to <br />
maintain the integrity of hazardous equipment (refer to Part 2). <br />
Approved Codes of Practice (Section 20) <br />
Approved codes of practice are provided for in the Act. They are statements of preferred <br />
work practice or arrangements, and may include procedures which could be taken into <br />
account when deciding on the practicable steps to be taken. Compliance with codes of <br />
practice is not mandatory; however, compliance with an approved code of practice may be <br />
used in Court as evidence of good practice of an employer or other duty holder having taken <br />
"all practicable steps" to meet the duty. <br />
Employers' Duties (Section 6) <br />
Employers have duties to ensure the health and safety of employees at work. <br />
Employers have a general duty to take "all practicable steps" to ensure the safety of <br />
employees while at work. In particular, they are required to take all practicable steps to: <br />
provide and maintain a safe working environment <br />
provide and maintain facilities for the safety and health of employees at work <br />
ensure that machinery and equipment are safe for employees <br />
ensure that working arrangements are not hazardous to employees <br />
provide procedures to deal with emergencies that may arise while employees are at work. <br />
Taking "all practicable steps" means doing what is reasonably able to be done in the <br />
circumstances, taking into account: <br />
54
the severity of any injury or harm to health that may occur <br />
the degree of risk or probability of that injury or harm occurring <br />
how much is known about the hazard and the ways of eliminating, reducing or controlling it <br />
the availability, effectiveness and cost of the possible safeguards. <br />
A person is required to take all practicable steps in respect of circumstances that they know <br />
or ought reasonably to know about. <br />
Hazard Management (Sections 7 to 10) <br />
Employers must identify and regularly review hazards in the place of work (existing, new <br />
and potential) to determine whether they are "significant hazards" and require further <br />
action. If an accident or harm occurs that requires particulars to be recorded, employers are <br />
required to have the matter investigated to determine if it was caused by or arose from a <br />
significant hazard (refer to part 2.2(2)). <br />
"Significant hazard" means a hazard that is an actual or potential cause or source of: <br />
serious harm (defined in Schedule 1 of the Act), or <br />
harm (being more than trivial) where the severity of effects on any person depend (entirely <br />
or among other things) on the extent or frequency of the person's exposure to the hazard, <br />
or <br />
harm that does not usually occur, or usually is not easily detectable, until a significant time <br />
after exposure to the hazard. <br />
Where the hazard is significant, the Act sets out the steps employers must take: <br />
Where practicable, the hazard must be eliminated <br />
If elimination is not practicable, the hazard must be isolated <br />
If it is impracticable to eliminate or isolate the hazard completely, then employers must <br />
minimise the likelihood that employees will be harmed by the hazard. <br />
Where the hazard has not been eliminated or isolated, employers must, where appropriate: <br />
provide protective clothing and equipment and ensure that it is accessible and used <br />
monitor employees' exposure to the hazard <br />
seek the consent of employees to monitor their health <br />
with informed consent, monitor employees' health. <br />
Information for Employees and Health and Safety Representatives (Section 12) <br />
Before employees begin work, they must be informed by their employer of: <br />
hazards they may be exposed to while at work <br />
hazards they may create which could harm other people <br />
how to minimise the likelihood of these hazards becoming a source of harm to themselves <br />
and others <br />
the location and correct use of safety equipment <br />
emergency procedures. <br />
Employers are also required to inform employees of the results of any health and safety <br />
monitoring. In doing so, the privacy of individual employees must be protected. <br />
Where there are employee health and safety representatives, the employer must ensure <br />
that the representatives have ready access to sufficient information about health and safety <br />
systems and issues in the place of work to enable them to be able to carry out their <br />
functions effectively. <br />
Training and Supervision of Employees (Section 13) <br />
An employer must ensure that every employee who: <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 55
does work of any kind, or <br />
uses plant of any kind, or <br />
deals with a substance of any kind <br />
in a place of work has the knowledge and experience -‐ or is supervised by someone who has <br />
-‐ so that they are not likely to suffer harm, or lead to the harm of others. <br />
Every employee must be adequately trained in the safe use of all plant, objects, substances, <br />
protective clothing and equipment that they are, or may be, required to use or handle. <br />
Responsibility for Employees' Work Activities (Section 15) <br />
An employer is also responsible for the health and safety of others arising from the work <br />
activities of their employees. They must take all practicable steps to ensure that no action or <br />
inaction of an employee while at work causes harm to any other person. <br />
Persons in Control of a Place of Work (Section 16) <br />
The Act places duties on persons who control a place of work in relation to people in the <br />
vicinity, and to visitors. <br />
A "person who controls a place of work" includes a person who owns, leases, subleases or <br />
occupies a place of work, or who owns, leases or subleases plant or equipment used in a <br />
place of work. <br />
Duties of Employees (Section 19) <br />
Every employee shall take all practicable steps to ensure: <br />
their own safety while at work (including using protective clothing and equipment); and <br />
that no action or inaction of theirs while at work causes harm to any other person. <br />
An employee has a right to refuse to undertake work that they consider likely to cause them <br />
serious harm. However, employees have an obligation to attempt to resolve the matter with <br />
their employer. <br />
Deemed Employees <br />
People receiving on-‐the-‐job training or work experience, loaned employees and volunteer <br />
workers are all deemed to be "employees" of an employer or self-‐employed person for <br />
whom they are working. Most employer duties apply, but not the duty to provide <br />
opportunities for employee participation. <br />
Employers to Provide Opportunities for Employee Participation (Part 2A) <br />
Employers must provide reasonable opportunities for employees to participate effectively in <br />
on-‐going processes for the improvement of health and safety in the place of work. Where <br />
there are more than 30 employees, or where an employee or union representing employees <br />
requests it, the employer must seek agreement on, develop, implement and maintain a <br />
system of employee participation. Where agreement cannot be reached on the system of <br />
employee participation, there are default provisions set out in the Act. <br />
Where employee health and safety representatives are elected, they are entitled to paid <br />
leave to attend approved training courses. <br />
A trained employee health and safety representative may issue a hazard notice to an <br />
employer where they believe there is a hazard in the place of work, they have brought it to <br />
the employer's attention and the issue has not been resolved. <br />
Employers and employees must deal with each other in good faith while seeking agreement <br />
on, developing and maintaining a system of employee participation. <br />
Accidents and Serious Harm Recording and Notification (Sections 25 and 26) <br />
The Act requires employers, the self-‐employed and principals to contractors to keep a <br />
register of work-‐related accidents and serious harm. <br />
For employers, this includes every accident that harmed (or might have harmed): <br />
56
any employee at work, or <br />
any person in a place of work controlled by the employer. <br />
Employers are also required to investigate all accidents, harm and "near misses" to <br />
determine whether they were caused by a significant hazard. <br />
"Serious harm" is defined in Schedule 1 of the Act. <br />
Any occurrences of serious harm of a kind that must be recorded shall also be notified to the <br />
Secretary of Labour (in practice, the nearest Department of Labour office) as soon as <br />
possible after the occurrence becomes known to the employer. In addition, the accident <br />
must also be reported in the prescribed form within seven days. (Forms are available from <br />
the Department of Labour website.) <br />
If a person suffers serious harm, the scene of the accident must not be interfered with unless <br />
to: <br />
save the life of, prevent harm to or prevent suffering to, any person <br />
maintain public access for essential services, e.g. electricity, gas <br />
prevent serious damage or loss of property. <br />
A health and safety inspector will advise whether or not the Department of Labour will <br />
investigate the accident and what action may be taken in the meantime. <br />
2.2 The general duty <br />
Every employer shall take all practicable steps to ensure the safety of employees while at <br />
work. <br />
This pivotal requirement of the Act is set out in section 6. It restates the object of the Act <br />
(from section 5) in terms of a general duty for employers. <br />
The section then expands on this general duty by prescribing the following particular <br />
duties to: <br />
Provide and maintain a safe working environment; <br />
Provide and maintain facilities for the safety and health of employees at work; <br />
Ensure that plant machinery and equipment in the place of work is designed, made, set up, <br />
and maintained to be safe for employees; <br />
Ensure that systems of work do not lead to employees being exposed to hazards in or <br />
around their place of work; and <br />
Develop procedures for dealing with emergencies that may arise while employees are at <br />
work. <br />
It is important to remember here that the standard of care that is required of all employers <br />
is that they take "all practicable steps". This is an important concept for employers, and <br />
others following the Act. It is discussed more fully at 1.5, All practicable steps. <br />
Briefly here, "all practicable steps" means doing what is reasonably able to be done in the <br />
circumstances, taking into account: <br />
The severity of any injury or harm to health that may occur; <br />
The degree of risk or probability of that injury or harm occurring; <br />
How much is known about the hazard and the ways of eliminating, reducing or controlling <br />
it; and <br />
The availability, effectiveness and cost of the possible safeguards. <br />
The standard applies in respect of circumstances that the person knows or ought reasonably <br />
to know about. <br />
OSH things you need to know: <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 57
Hazard – Hazard means an activity, arrangement, circumstance, event, occurrence, <br />
phenomenon, process, situation, or substance (whether arising or caused within or outside <br />
a place of work) that is an actual or potential cause or source of harm. This <br />
Includes a situation where a person's behaviour may be an actual or potential cause or <br />
source of harm to the person or another person. <br />
What do you do about a hazard? <br />
You can ELIMINATE the hazard – get rid of it all together! <br />
Or <br />
You can ISOLATE the hazard – set it apart from where it causes harm. <br />
Or <br />
You can MINIMISE the hazard – lessen the potential danger of the hazard. <br />
Equipment and Materials <br />
When you first think about it, you may not think that your role at Community Connections <br />
requires you to use personal protective equipment. However, when you think further, <br />
there are often instances in your support role when the requirement for you to carry out <br />
your work safely means that you are using personal protective equipment. <br />
Personal protective equipment is something that you have ON YOUR PERSON that <br />
protects you from harm or injury. <br />
Think about changing a light bulb – if the light bulb is hot, you will find something to wrap <br />
around your hand so it doesn’t burn when you remove it! <br />
When you are supporting a person with their cleaning, you will wear rubber gloves etc. <br />
Other examples might be: rubber gloves when washing dishes, oven mits when removing <br />
something from the oven or microwave, wearing an apron to protect you from splashes <br />
from the stove top, wearing sensible shoes when working in the kitchen with sharp knives, <br />
using hair ties to keep long hair tied back if working with a person who is known to pull hair <br />
etc. <br />
It is important that you use equipment and materials according to manufacturer’s <br />
guidelines and common sense. By doing this, you are likely to be managing potential <br />
hazards well. <br />
Learning Partnerships<br />
You need to do this next question in support time. Please talk with the person you support and<br />
explain explain that you need to be seen using personal protective equipment, that’s why someone is<br />
observing. Alternatively, you could ask the person you support to take photos of you in their home!<br />
Remember to note the Book number and Question number on your time/tasksheet. See the<br />
Learners’ Website for the amount of time you can claim.<br />
16. Personal Protective Equipment.<br />
It is important that we SEE that you are using protective equipment safely and according to <br />
58
manufacturer’s guidelines. <br />
Please organise for your Coordinator to observe in TWO situations using personal protective <br />
equipment. Your Coordinator will then submit verification. <br />
If you cannot organise for your Coordinator to observe you, you will need to send photographs to <br />
your Assessor. <br />
You also need to fill in the details below. <br />
Situation One: <br />
The personal protective equipment I am using is: <br />
The personal protective equipment I am using is disposable gloves when sorting<br />
laundry.<br />
The reason for using this equipment is: <br />
The reason for this equipment is to prevent contamination by soiled clothing and<br />
bedding.<br />
Situation Two: <br />
The personal protective equipment I am using is: <br />
The reason for this equipment is to prevent contamination by soiled clothing <br />
The reason for using this equipment is: <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28536v1: 2.2<br />
Evidence: The learner has identified two pieces of personal protective equipment and worn it in accordance with<br />
Community Connections Policy.<br />
Judgement: The learner has demonstrated that they are using personal protective equipment where<br />
appropriate in their work.<br />
Looking at Community Connections’ OSH policies. <br />
You must read the following Community Connections Policies. <br />
1. ‘Working Safely’ in your Staff Handbook.<br />
2. ‘Health and Safety’ in your Staff Handbook.<br />
3. The OSH Hazard Checklist which you will find in your Staff Handbook.<br />
4. The Medication Policy in your Staff Handbook.<br />
5. ‘Emergency Procedures’ in your Staff Handbook.<br />
6. ‘Emergency Management’ in your Staff Handbook.<br />
7. The Pandemic Plan policy in your Staff Handbook.<br />
8. The Natural Disaster Plan in the Document Store.<br />
9. The Sudden Death policy in your Staff Handbook.<br />
10. The Challenging Behaviour policy in your Staff Handbook.<br />
11. The Client Bank Accounts policy in your Staff Handbook.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 59
12. The Use of Vehicles policy in your Staff Handbook.<br />
17. Health and Safety Practices<br />
Describe TWO health and safety practices that Community Connections has to keep the people we <br />
support safe. <br />
Practice One: <br />
When administering medication it is Community Connections’ Medication Policy to<br />
follow the ‘5 Rights’ - Principle of Right Person, Right Drug, Right Time, Right Dose,<br />
Right Route. This is to ensure that the right dose is administered to the right person in<br />
the right form at the right time.<br />
Verification -‐ Please quote from Community Connections policy to support your answer: <br />
Practice Two: <br />
Community Connections’ Sudden Death Policy outlines procedure to be followed in a<br />
sudden death event. This procedure outlines who must be contacted, what must not be<br />
done (a person’s body must not be moved or disturbed), who makes funeral<br />
arrangements and what staff need to do.<br />
Verification -‐ Please quote from Community Connections policy to support your answer: <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28536v1: 1.1<br />
Evidence: The learner has identified two Community Connections health and safety practices for keeping<br />
people we support safe, and has provided source from Community Connections policy.<br />
Judgement: The learner has described the practices used within Community Connections in sufficient detail to<br />
establish understanding.<br />
18. Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities<br />
Explain TWO health and safety roles and responsibilities that you have when you are working for <br />
Community Connections. <br />
Note: you must include the words ‘role’ and ‘responsibility’ in your answer. <br />
Example:<br />
As part of my role I have to deal with Hazardous waste, it is my responsibility to wear protective clothing.<br />
First Role and Responsibility: <br />
As part of my role as a support worker I may be required to work in a situation where<br />
people supported may exhibit behaviour that is challenging. Should a supported<br />
person behave in a way considered to be challenging, It is my responsibility to follow<br />
the Community Connections Challenging Behaviour procedure and report the situation<br />
to my coordinator or manager.<br />
Verification -‐ Please quote from Community Connections policy to support your answer: <br />
Second Role and Responsibility: <br />
As part of my support worker role the homes of people I support is my workplace. It is<br />
my responsibility to be alert to possible hazards in this workplace do what is<br />
practicable to they occur, eliminate, isolate or minimise hazards should they occur.<br />
60
Verification -‐ Please quote from Community Connections policy to support your answer: <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28536v1: 1.2<br />
Evidence: The learner has identified two health and safety roles and responsibilities, and provided supporting<br />
documentation from Community Connections policy.<br />
Judgement: The learner has described the roles and responsibilities in sufficient detail as to establish good<br />
understanding.<br />
Learning Partnerships<br />
If the person you support agrees, you can complete the next question in support time. Talk with the<br />
person you support about how their home is your workplace and explain to them about hazards. You<br />
could then identify some hazards that may be in their home (although we hope not!).<br />
Remember to note the Book number and Question number on your time/tasksheet. See the<br />
Learners’ Website for the amount of time you can claim.<br />
19. Hazards<br />
a) Identify TWO hazards that you have encountered in your work with Community Connections <br />
AND <br />
b) Explain how you would minimised, isolated or eliminated the hazard <br />
AND <br />
c) Explain how you alerted Community Connections to this hazard. <br />
Example:<br />
Hazard One:<br />
a) A person I support has a dog that occasionally bites when it is taken by surprise.<br />
b) I isolated the hazard by asking the person I support to put their dog in the kennel BEFORE I come to do my<br />
support and only let it out when I have gone.<br />
c) I talked the situation over with my Coordinator and together we decided that this was a good strategy. The<br />
dog has been noted on the person’s file so that relief staff will know about it.<br />
PLEASE USE THE LAYOUT OF THE EXAMPLE ABOVE WHEN YOU ARE ANSWERING THIS QUESTION <br />
Hazard One a) <br />
A person I support had a dangerously crowded kitchen bench area due to several<br />
electrical appliances that were often used at the same time.<br />
Hazard One b) <br />
I minimised the hazard by supporting the person to obtain a small table to hold her<br />
electric frying pan. This meant that this appliance could be used on the table freeing<br />
space on the bench.<br />
Hazard One c) <br />
I completed an incident report and reported the situation to my coordinator.<br />
Hazard Two a) <br />
Hazard Two b) <br />
Hazard Two c) <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 61
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28536v1: 2.1, 2.3.<br />
Evidence: The learner has correctly identified two hazards in their workplaces within Community Connections.<br />
Actions taken to minimise, isolate or eliminate are described. The Coordinator (verifyer) has confirmed that this<br />
hazardous situation was or is real, and that the hazard was reported to them via their tasksheet, in person, or by<br />
submitting an accident/incident/issue of concern form.<br />
Judgement: Appropriate action has been taken around two hazards, and sufficient evidence has been provided<br />
as to establish accordance with Community Connections policy and procedure.<br />
Learning Partnerships<br />
If the person you support agrees, you could complete the next question in support time. Talk together<br />
about the appropriate responses in emergencies. Remember to note the Book number and Question<br />
number on your time/tasksheet. See the Learners’ Website for the amount of time you can claim.<br />
20. Responding to Emergencies.<br />
a. Describe what you would do if a person you were supporting had what you thought was a heart <br />
attack while you were supporting them in their home. <br />
I would dial 111 and alert emergency services of the suspected heart attack, give them<br />
appropriate details and follow their advice regarding treatment.<br />
Once the incident is finished I would contact my coordinator to discuss the incident,<br />
actions taken and decisions made. I would complete an Incident Report and follow the<br />
Debrief Serious Incident Policy if necessary.<br />
Verification -‐ Please quote from Community Connections policy to support your answer: <br />
b. Describe what you would do an oven fire looked as if it was getting out of control while you were <br />
supporting a person in their home. <br />
If an oven fire appeared to be getting out of control I would remove myself and the<br />
supported person from the area. I would dial 111 emergency services and supply the<br />
necessary details.<br />
Once the incident is finished I would contact my coordinator to discuss the incident,<br />
actions taken and decisions made. I would complete an Incident Report and follow the<br />
Debrief Serious Incident Policy if necessary.<br />
Verification -‐ Please quote from Community Connections policy to support your answer: <br />
c. Describe what you would do if there was a flash flood while you were supporting a person in their <br />
home. <br />
If there were a flash flood in a supported person’s home I would remove myself and the<br />
supported person from the area if it were possible and safe to do so. I would phone for<br />
help or call emergency services if necessary using a neighbour’s phone if I needed to.<br />
Verification -‐ Please quote from Community Connections policy to support your answer: <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
62
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28536v1: 1.4.<br />
Evidence: The learner has correctly described the Community Connections procedures for responding three<br />
emergencies.<br />
Judgement: The learner has described responses to a medical emergency, a physical emergency and an<br />
environmental emergency.<br />
Be Proactive: <br />
While working at Community Connections you are not generally required to wear <br />
protective clothing or use protective equipment. <br />
However, because you work in people’s homes, you are continually using equipment that <br />
you need to make sure is safe, <br />
However, there are instances when Community Connections requires you to be proactive <br />
regarding your dress and personal presentation. Two examples of this are the Dress Code <br />
(found in the Community Connections Code of Conduct) and when you are supporting a <br />
person in a challenging situation. <br />
Health and Safety Coordinator Verification Form<br />
HEALTH AND SAFETY VERIFICATION FORM FORM: <br />
It is the Coordinator’s responsibility to fill in this form fully and send it to the CCLP <br />
Assessors. <br />
I confirm that this learner demonstrates health and safety practices according to the <br />
standards below: <br />
1. I have observed this learner in their working environment using two pieces of personal <br />
protection equipment safely. YES / NO (circle one) <br />
Please provide a specific comment that describes the use of the personal protection <br />
equipment: <br />
2. I confirm that the situations described by this learner in Question 14 are real, and that <br />
the learner followed Community Connections Policy and Procedure in reporting them. <br />
YES / NO (circle one) <br />
Please provide a specific comment about the reporting that supports your answer above: <br />
3. I confirm that this learner has participated in updating either a Health and Safety <br />
Checklist, an OSH Hazard Checklist or a Pandemic Plan for a person they support. <br />
And in doing so, they are ensuring the person supported’s security. YES / NO (circle one) <br />
Please state which checklist or plan, and provide a source (with date) where this can be <br />
verified: <br />
4. I confirm that this learner follows Community Connections procedures for ensuring the<br />
security of the support environment. YES / NO (circle one)<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 63
Please provide a specific example that supports your answer above: <br />
Coordinator Name: <br />
Coordinator Signature: <br />
Date: <br />
When you have completed and signed this form, please scan it to: assessors@ccslt.org.nz <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28536v1: 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2<br />
Evidence: Coordinator (Verifier) has confirmed that the learner is observed using two pieces of personal<br />
protection equipment according to Community Connections Policies and Procedures. The Coordinator has also<br />
confirmed that the learner is observed as using appropriate processes around reporting hazards. Finally, the<br />
Coordinator has observed the Learner participating in Community Connections processes that ensure the<br />
security of the people we support and their environments.<br />
Judgement: The verifier has provided sufficient detail in their comments as to establish confidence in the eficacy<br />
of the observations.<br />
All Community Connections employees are required to dress in a professional manner and <br />
in a way that will not cause offense to others. This is especially important in establishing <br />
boundaries and not inadvertently giving the people we support ‘mixed messages’. <br />
When supporting people in potentially challenging situations it is important to think about <br />
how your clothing and accessories may cause injury or distress. It is advised that you wear <br />
flat shoes, do not wear necklaces, refrain from wearing dangling earings, tie long hair back <br />
etc. Do not wear jewelry or clothing that is going to cause you grief if it is damaged. There <br />
are also procedural things you are required to do (see the Challenging Behaviour Policy). <br />
MANAGING STRESS<br />
Another aspect of keeping yourself well at work is managing stress. Community <br />
Connections recognises that the role of the Support Worker can sometimes be stressful and <br />
we work together with you to address this. <br />
Because we are all individuals, we become stressed by different things. The most important <br />
thing that you can do is identify what sorts of things stress you, and how you react to that <br />
stress. <br />
Example:<br />
A Support Worker who is always on time might become stressed when the person<br />
being supported is often up to half an hour late for their support. The Support<br />
Worker might find that she/he reacts to that stress by being resentful of the person<br />
being supported for the rest of their support time.<br />
64
This then becomes a bad situation as the good relationship between the Support<br />
Worker and the person being supported is at risk.<br />
It also has an impact on the Support Worker – it might be that the resentment is still<br />
there in the evenings when it’s meant to be family time, or that sleep is interrupted,<br />
or that the Support Worker gets a headache during the support time.<br />
The important thing is that the Support Worker identifies what is causes stress, and<br />
knows how she/he reacts to that stress.<br />
WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT STRESS? <br />
Community Connections is committed to working with you to make your role as free from <br />
stress as possible. However, we can’t help you if we don’t know that you are experiencing <br />
stress. <br />
IF YOU ARE FEELING STRESSED, YOU MUST TELL YOUR COORDINATOR. <br />
You can do this in a variety of ways: <br />
• You can phone or text them straight away and let them know, and ask to meet with<br />
them.<br />
• You can talk with them at your monthly coaching sessions.<br />
• You can ask a trusted colleague or friend to speak with your Coordinator on your behalf,<br />
or be with you when you talk with your Coordinator.<br />
However you do it, it’s important that you let your Coordinator know what you are feeling. <br />
Now that you have alerted your Coordinator to your stress, you also need to take some <br />
responsibility for reducing your unwanted stress. <br />
Here are some things that might help you to reduce stress and the effects of stress: <br />
1. Increase your physical activity. If you’re a gym person, make sure that you diary in time<br />
to go regularly. If you’re not into gyms, what about scheduling a regular walk (down to<br />
the dairy to get the milk each morning, taking the dog out, walking to visit your friend<br />
instead of driving etc.)?<br />
2. Make sure that you are using your annual leave, and that you are taking regular breaks<br />
from work.<br />
3. Pay more attention to the quality of your diet. Are you eating regularly? Are your meals<br />
balanced etc.?<br />
4. Make sure you get enough sleep. Here’s a few tips: set a regular bedtime and have a bit<br />
of a ‘bedtime routine’, try and wake up at about the same time each day, if you wake up<br />
in the night worrying about things write it down on a piece of paper and tell yourself<br />
you’ll ‘think about that tomorrow’! Try and relax in the evening, but resist falling asleep in<br />
front of the TV etc., save sleeping for bedtime!<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 65
5. Relaxation techniques. This might be soaking in the bath, spending time chatting with a<br />
friend about anything EXCEPT what causes you stress, sitting at the beach staring at<br />
the water, listening to your favourite music, reading a book etc.<br />
6. Talk your stress through. Talk with a person who will help you work through what is<br />
causing you stress. Make sure that you’re not just going over and over the stressful<br />
issue though, the talk needs to be productive and helpful.<br />
7. Time Management. Is your stress due to time management issues? It may be that you<br />
need to think about priorities for time etc.<br />
8. Breaking bad habits. Sometimes the cause of our stress is habits that we have<br />
developed. We might be perfectionists who need to understand that others are not. We<br />
might be in the habit of thinking negatively, and we need to somehow ‘flip’ that around,<br />
or we may find it difficult to accept that sometimes things are simply out of our control.<br />
Whatever the habit may be, we need to look at ourselves closely and come to<br />
understand ourselves, so that we can make some changes to enable our lives to be a<br />
bit less stressful.<br />
9. Just say NO. Sometimes stress is because we don’t know how to say no. Learn some<br />
ways to say ‘no’ nicely. Try to remember to have some space between being asked to<br />
do something and you automatically agreeing to it. The phrase “before I commit to that,<br />
I’ll need to check my diary” can be quite helpful!<br />
21. Stress.<br />
a) Describe at FOUR causes of stress that you have experienced in your role as a Support Worker, or you think <br />
might cause you stress in the future. <br />
AND <br />
b) Explain what impact that stress might have on your health and well-‐being. <br />
Stress One: <br />
The impact on my health and wellbeing of this stress would be: <br />
Stress Two: <br />
The impact on my health and wellbeing of this stress would be: <br />
Stress Three: <br />
The impact on my health and wellbeing of this stress would be: <br />
Stress Four: <br />
The impact on my health and wellbeing of this stress would be: <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: n/a<br />
66
Evidence: The learner has identified four types of stresses and explained how they would impact on their own<br />
well-being.<br />
Judgement: The stresses identified are work-related.<br />
CC Desired Outcome:<br />
The Support Worker has an understanding of their own stress triggers, knows the process for getting<br />
help, and understands that it is also his/her responsibility to manage their stress.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 67
SUSPECTED ABUSE<br />
While we wish it wasn’t so, it is an uncomfortable fact that neglect and abuse is a reality. <br />
This is a very complex issue and each situation is very unique, so this piece of learning is not <br />
training you on how to work with a person who has been abused. This section of your <br />
Learning Programme is simply to alert you to different kinds of abuse, some signs that may <br />
indicate abuse, and the processes to follow within Community Connections if you suspect <br />
abuse has occurred, or that abuse has been disclosed to you. <br />
Let’s start with a definition. Community Connections’ definition of abuse is: <br />
“Abuse is any action that causes some kind of harm to the person who is being <br />
supported.” <br />
Different kinds of abuse. <br />
As you will see from the policy above, abuse can come in a number of forms: <br />
• Sexual Abuse -‐ Any sexual contact between an adult and child 16 years of age and <br />
younger; or any sexual activity with an adult who is unable to understand, has not given <br />
consent, is threatened, coerced or forced to engage in sexual behaviour. Sexual Abuse <br />
can also be non-‐contact, it can be verbal abuse of a sexual nature, inappropriate <br />
photographs, indecent exposure or watching a person at inappropriate times. <br />
• Physical Abuse -‐ Any non-‐accidental physical injury or injuries to a child or adult. E.g. <br />
inflicting pain of any sort or causing bruises, fractures, burns, electric shock, or any <br />
unpleasant sensation, hitting, punching, pushing, biting, choking etc. <br />
• Emotional / Psychological Abuse -‐ Verbal assaults, threats of maltreatment, <br />
harassment, humiliation or intimidation, or failure to interact with a person or to <br />
acknowledge that person’s existence. Attacks on self esteem, blaming, criticizing <br />
thought or feelings etc. This may also include denying cultural or religious needs and <br />
preferences. <br />
• Financial Abuse -‐ using another person’s assets without their knowledge or permission, <br />
denying a person the use of their own assets, misrepresenting a person’s financial <br />
68
situation to them etc. E.g. putting additional groceries in with a person’s shopping so <br />
they pay for them, but don’t receive them, misrepresenting rents or living costs etc. <br />
• Neglect : <br />
- Physical neglect -‐ failure to provide adequate food, shelter, clothing and protection. <br />
- Passive neglect -‐ withholding or failure to provide the necessities of life. <br />
- Willful deprivation -‐ willfully denying a person assistance and thereby exposing that <br />
person to the risk of physical, mental or emotional harm. <br />
- Emotional neglect -‐ restricting the social, intellectual and emotional growth or well <br />
being of a person. <br />
Who Abuses? <br />
A more complex definition of abuse could be: <br />
The systematic pattern of behaviours in a relationship that are used to gain and/or <br />
maintain power and control over another. <br />
The key words in this definition are “power” and “control”. An abuser is usually a person <br />
who has power or control over another person, or wants to have power and control over <br />
another person. <br />
Having said this, abuse can be either: <br />
! Personal – where one person abuses another. <br />
Or <br />
! Systemic – where the wider system (e.g. legal, welfare, social systems etc.) don’t <br />
recognise, provide or attempt to provide services that are appropriate to that person’s <br />
age, gender, culture, needs or preferences. E.g. putting a vulnerable girl in the same <br />
physical environment as teenaged boys without adequate risk management strategies <br />
in place. <br />
Power and Control <br />
As a Support Worker at Community Connections, you have power and control over <br />
the people you support. You may not think that you do, but the fact that you are <br />
supporting vulnerable people in a role where you are perceived to have ‘greater <br />
knowledge’ means that you do hold a measure of power and control. <br />
All Community Connections’ policies and procedures (without exception), are designed to <br />
minimise this level of power and control. The policies and procedures reflect Community <br />
Connections’ philosophy that each person is the expert in their own lives and that they <br />
should be supported to have control over their own lives. <br />
Community Connections’ policies and procedures also promote transparency. Involvement <br />
of family and natural support networks in support situations are actively sought, accurate <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 69
note-‐taking is requested, team meetings and coaching are vital. This transparency means a <br />
safer environment for both the people we support and you as a Support Worker. <br />
But even with these policies and procedures in place, it is important that you understand <br />
the implications of you being in a position of power. It means that you are in a situation <br />
where you have the potential to abuse – perhaps even without knowing it. You need to <br />
always be conscious of, and vigilant about, this. <br />
Go through Community Connections policies and procedures and identify 4 <br />
policies where Community Connections has acknowledged and addressed <br />
the importance of balancing the power relationship between Community <br />
Connections and the people we support and/or promoting transparency.<br />
Say HOW this transparency ensures safety for the people we support. <br />
22. Types of Vulnerability, and Power Relationships.<br />
a) For each of the circumstances below explain how they might make a person you support vulnerable to <br />
harm or abuse. <br />
AND <br />
b) Give an example of how an unethical support person could take advantage of this vulnerability <br />
because of the power relationship. <br />
Example:<br />
Not understanding the different values of coins and notes.<br />
This could make the person more vulnerable to harm or abuse because: When he is grocery shopping he<br />
relies on people being honest, taking the correct money from his wallet and giving him the correct change.<br />
An unethical support person could take advantage of this vulnerability by: when going grocery shopping a<br />
support worker could put items in the trolley for themselves and tell the person they will pay him back, but not<br />
give him the correct amount of money.<br />
Power Relationship: If the person being supported accused the support worker, it would be their word against<br />
the support worker’s word, and because the person doesn’t understand money most people might believe the<br />
support worker as they are more ‘expert’ than the person being supported.<br />
a) Having a physical impairment that limits the person’s ability to take care of their own needs. <br />
This could make the person more vulnerable to harm or abuse because: <br />
An unethical support person could take advantage of this vulnerability by: <br />
Power Relationship: <br />
b) Being emotionally vulnerable due to past trauma or present experience of mental ill health: <br />
This could make the person more vulnerable to harm or abuse because: <br />
An unethical support person could take advantage of this vulnerability by: <br />
Power Relationship: <br />
c) Not having unpaid family or friends in the person’s everyday life: <br />
This could make the person more vulnerable to harm or abuse because: <br />
An unethical support person could take advantage of this vulnerability by: <br />
Power Relationship: <br />
70
d) Not getting out and about in the community on a daily or weekly basis: <br />
This could make the person more vulnerable to harm or abuse because: <br />
An unethical support person could take advantage of this vulnerability by: <br />
Power Relationship: <br />
e) Not having the skills to manage personal budgets and other financial matters: <br />
This could make the person more vulnerable to harm or abuse because: <br />
An unethical support person could take advantage of this vulnerability by: <br />
Power Relationship: <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28521v1: 1.1, 1.2, 2.2<br />
Evidence: The learner has described how a person with a physical, emotional and financial vulnerability has the<br />
potential to be abused or harmed. The learner has also described how lack of natural supports and isolation can<br />
increase the likelihood of abuse or harm. (5 situations in total)<br />
Judgement: The descriptions for each show a clear understanding of how a person accessing a supported living<br />
service has increased potential for harm – as opposed to people in the community who are not receiving<br />
specialist services due to the power relationships that exist.<br />
Indicators of Abuse. <br />
Abuse can have an effect people in both the short and long term. Even though a person <br />
may no longer be in an abusive situation, they may continue to have effects from the abuse <br />
for many years. <br />
Possible Indicators of Abuse <br />
(taken from Careerforce Workbook for US01836v5) <br />
Sexual Abuse: <br />
Behavioural Signs: <br />
• Poor peer relationships. <br />
• Unusual interest in sex for age. <br />
• Drastic change in school <br />
achievement. <br />
• Runaway or delinquent behaviour. <br />
• Nightmares / Dreams. <br />
• Excessive preoccupation with <br />
genitals. <br />
• Repetitive exploration of others. <br />
• Simulated sexual activity with others, <br />
animals, dolls or objects. <br />
Physical Signs: <br />
• Difficulty walking or sitting, or <br />
frequent urination. Pain, swelling or <br />
itching in genital area. <br />
• Bruises, bleeding, or discharge in <br />
genital area. <br />
• Stained or bloody underclothing. <br />
• Sexually transmitted infections. <br />
• Tearing around anus or vagina. <br />
• Gagging. <br />
• Difficulty swallowing food. <br />
• Internal organ damage which may be <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 71
• Sexual aggression. <br />
• Excessive masturbation. <br />
• Verbally descriptive sexual language <br />
inappropriate for age. <br />
• Avoidance and/or fear of certain <br />
people. <br />
• Changed behaviour when the abuser <br />
is near. <br />
• Depression. <br />
• Inappropriate seductive behaviour. <br />
• Fearful or normal exposure to nudity. <br />
• Prostitution/inhibition. <br />
Physical Abuse: <br />
Behavioural Signs: <br />
• Delay in seeking medical help. <br />
• Extremes in behaviour – very <br />
aggressive, or withdrawn and shy. <br />
• Afraid to go home. <br />
• Frightened of parents. <br />
• Fearful of other adults. <br />
• Anxiety. <br />
• Loss of self esteem. <br />
• Regression, bed-‐wetting. <br />
• Sadness. <br />
• Defiance. <br />
• Suicidal actions. <br />
• Fear of care workers. <br />
• Obsession-‐washing. <br />
Emotional Abuse: <br />
Behavioural Signs: <br />
• Low self-‐esteem – may not maintain <br />
eye contact. <br />
• Self-‐criticism <br />
• Severe Depression. <br />
• Nervous behaviour, repeated actions. <br />
• Severe anxiety – signs of agitation <br />
and/or anger. <br />
• Extreme withdrawal – flinching, <br />
passivity and watchfulness. <br />
• Failure to learn. <br />
• Regression – bed wetting, rocking, <br />
biting, sucking. <br />
• Inability to sleep and sleepwalking. <br />
• Obsessions – washing, cleanliness. <br />
• Fear. <br />
• Emotionally upset, disturbed. <br />
indicated by abdominal pain, <br />
• Soreness around anus or vagina. <br />
Physical Signs: <br />
• Bruises, welts on face, neck, chest, <br />
back or elsewhere. <br />
• Injuries in the shape of an object <br />
(belt, cord). <br />
• Unexplained burns/scalds on palms, <br />
soles of feet, back. <br />
• Fractures that do not heal. <br />
• Loss of weight/malnutrition. <br />
• Depression. <br />
• Head Injuries. <br />
• Failure to thrive. <br />
• Frequent visits to the emergency <br />
department with injuries. <br />
Physical Signs: <br />
• Restlessness / nervousness. <br />
• Failure to thrive (in young people). <br />
• Tiredness. <br />
• Embarrassment. <br />
• Sleep disturbances. <br />
• Withdrawal <br />
• Depression. <br />
• Lack of eye contact. <br />
72
• Suicidal actions. <br />
• Being very dependent. <br />
• Defiance. <br />
Financial Abuse: <br />
Behavioural Signs: <br />
• Gives away their property / <br />
belongings. <br />
• Withdraws lots of money at the same <br />
time or within the same week. <br />
• Unable to pay their bills. <br />
• Unable to buy the things they need – <br />
clothes, food and other necessities. <br />
• Confused about where all their <br />
money, property and belongings <br />
have gone. <br />
• Unable or unwilling to explain losses <br />
or disappearance of valuables. <br />
Self Neglect: <br />
Behavioural Signs: <br />
• The person is quiet and doesn’t want <br />
to talk or ask questions. <br />
• The person: <br />
• Avoids people. <br />
o Is not eating/losing weight. <br />
o Their house is full of rubbish. <br />
o They are not paying bills. <br />
o They own too many pets. <br />
o There is dirt and animal waste <br />
Physical Signs: <br />
• Malnutrition. <br />
• Belongings that were in their <br />
possession are missing. <br />
• Sudden agitation and wanting to <br />
discuss changes in a will. <br />
• Unusual bank activity. <br />
in the house. <br />
Long term, abuse can affect people: <br />
• Physically <br />
• Psychologically <br />
• Socially <br />
• Sexually <br />
• Constant fear and loneliness. <br />
• Relationship difficulties – <br />
o Trouble trusting others and making new friends. <br />
o Trouble with intimacy. <br />
o Trouble with sexual relationships. <br />
• Reliance on medication such as anti-‐depressants. <br />
• Substance abuse. <br />
• Eating disorders. <br />
• Inability to show emotions, express feelings, feeling numb. <br />
• Depression and anxiety. <br />
• Flashbacks and nightmares. <br />
• Intense or suppressed anger. <br />
Physical Signs: <br />
• Unclean or unsafe living conditions <br />
• Not enough food or heating has been <br />
provided, person is cold and <br />
shivering. <br />
• The person is unclean or their clothes <br />
are dirty. <br />
• Bruises or burns. <br />
• The person keeps away from food or <br />
the toilet for long periods of time. <br />
• Smelling of body odour. <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 73
23. Indicators of Abuse<br />
For each type of abuse listed below: <br />
a) Describe TWO possible indicators (patterns or signs) of each type of abuse that you might <br />
observe in your work. <br />
AND <br />
b) Describe TWO possible long term effects of each type of abuse that a person in a service like <br />
Community Connections might experience. <br />
IMPORTANT NOTE: When answering this question, please do not simply copy some of the answers from the <br />
information given to you above. <br />
Please think about your work environment and what indicators you may notice in a supported living situation. <br />
Example: Physical Abuse.<br />
Two possible indicators: I might observe that the person I support doesn’t like to have doors closed in their<br />
house. I might also observe that they always stand or sit closest to the doors either in their home or when we are<br />
out at café’s.<br />
Two possible long term effects: The person might not like to be supported by men or women who they<br />
perceive as physically threatening. They might not share things in their support relationship for fear that their<br />
support worker will get ‘mad’ and hurt them.<br />
PLEASE USE THE LAYOUT OF THE EXAMPLE ABOVE WHEN YOU ARE ANSWERING THIS QUESTION <br />
a) Sexual Abuse: <br />
Two possible indicators: <br />
Two possible long term effects: <br />
b) Physical Abuse: <br />
Two possible indicators: <br />
Two possible long term effects: <br />
c) Emotional Abuse <br />
Two possible indicators: <br />
Two possible long term effects: <br />
d) Neglect: <br />
Two possible indicators: <br />
Two possible long term effects: <br />
e) Financial Abuse: <br />
Two possible indicators: <br />
Two possible long term effects: <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
74
Unit Standard and Elements: US28521v1: 2.1, 2.3<br />
Evidence: The learner has described two possible indicators of each type of abuse and two possible long term<br />
effects from each type of abuse<br />
Judgement: The identified indicators and effects are ones that a support worker might reasonably observe within<br />
the supported living support context.<br />
Please read the Alleged Abuse Policy. You can find it on the Internal <br />
Website or in your Staff Handbook. Please also look at an <br />
Accident/Incident Report Form (if you don’t have one you can view it on <br />
the Internal Website). <br />
24. Community Connections Alleged Abuse Reporting Procedures.<br />
a) Please describe the process that you need to go through if someone you support has told you <br />
that they are being abused. <br />
b) How does this process support the person’s right to privacy? <br />
c) How does this process support the person’s right to dignity? <br />
d) How does this process support the person’s right to citizenship? <br />
Verification: copy and paste from the Alleged Abuse Policy to support your answer. <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28521v1: 3.1<br />
Evidence: The learner has described the Community Connections Alleged Abuse Policy.<br />
Judgement: The learner has described the connection between the policy and the person’s rights to privacy,<br />
dignity and the treatment accorded to any member of our community.<br />
25. Community Connections Incident Reporting Process.<br />
Please fill in a Community Connections Incident Report based on the following made-‐up story. <br />
First, read the story below. <br />
Second, click on the link at the end of the story. It will take you to a copy of the Community <br />
Connections Incident Report Form. <br />
You are going to work with Julie on Tuesday the 22 nd May, 2015 at 11.30am to 3.30pm. You don’t usually <br />
work with Julie, Henrietta works with Julie and has done so for a long time. However, Henrietta is sick and you <br />
are filling in for her. Usually your Coordinator, Candace, fills in for Henrietta, but Candace is too busy today. <br />
You are required to assist Julie to get ready to go out to a group lunch, and then when you get back you will <br />
help her with dinner. Candace has also asked if you could quickly check the blister pack and make sure that <br />
Julie has taken her medication for the day. <br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 75
When you arrive at Julie’s house (21 Grownup Street, Timbuktu), she is already dressed in her nice clothes <br />
and ready to head out to lunch. You go to lunch and everyone has a nice time. <br />
When you get back to Julie’s house, you suggest that she gets out of her nice clothes before beginning to cook <br />
her dinner. Julie seems reluctant to do this. When you ask if that’s what Henrietta suggests, Julie agrees that <br />
she does get changed with Henrietta, but is still reluctant to get changed. You carefully make clear to Julie <br />
that you will give her privacy in her bedroom in which to get changed. Julie then agrees to get changed. You <br />
are waiting in the kitchen when Julie comes in wearing a singlet and shorts. The singlet is quite baggy and you <br />
see that she has a bruise on the outside of her breast, visible over the armhole edge of her bra. You mention <br />
casually that it looks sore, and how did she get the bruise. Julie tells you she doesn’t know. <br />
While preparing dinner, Julie nicks her finger with the knife she is using to slice the carrots. She is not too <br />
concerned, you run it under cold water until the small amount of bleeding is stopped, and then show Julie <br />
how to put a band aid on it. <br />
When dinner is done, just prior to you leaving, you check the blister pack of medication. While doing that you <br />
notice that there are some PRN meds also in the cupboard. When you ask her, Julie is not very clear on what <br />
the PRN medication is for. <br />
CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO BE TAKEN TO THE CCLP LEARNERS COPY OF THE INCIDENT FORM: <br />
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1I4y13XW3YdWPrQNoq7Hxkq6t9QguuGIu8MGRldF5oVw <br />
EXAMPLE IDEAL RESPONSE:<br />
Type of incident: First Aid Injury/Illness, Potential Harm<br />
Who was harmed or had/has the potential to be harmed/affected: Person we support<br />
Where did the incident occur: At the home of someone we support<br />
Service Type: Supported Living<br />
Service Area: Palmerston North<br />
Date of incident: 04/03/2016<br />
Time of incident: 02:30:00<br />
Address of Incident: 21 Grownup Street, Timbuktu<br />
Persons Involved: Julie and myself<br />
Description of Incident: I noticed a bruise on the edge of Julie's breast that she didn't seem to know how it got there.<br />
She has PRN medication she doesn't really know what it's for. She had a minor cut on her finger.<br />
Name of Person Completing the Form: Tallulah Jones<br />
What was the direct cause of the incident and what were the factors, in your opinion, that lead up to this incident? The<br />
cut on the finger was caused by a knife while cutting carrots. Lack of attention.<br />
Immediate action taken at time of incident: I showed Julie how to run the cut under cold water and then how to put a<br />
band aid on it.<br />
Name of First Aid provider: Julie (assisted by me)<br />
Recommendation of changes to improve safety and prevent future incidents of this nature (CORRECTIVE ACTION),<br />
including who will complete them and by when (if known): I think that we need to make sure Julie knows what her PRN<br />
medication is for.<br />
I also think that someone whom she trusts should ask about the bruise.<br />
Finally, we need to show her how to handle her cutting knives better.<br />
Persons Notified: Candace (Coordinator)<br />
76
Date and time Coordinator or Manager notified: 22 May, 2015 at 3.45pm<br />
Name of Coordinator or Manager: assessors@ccslt.org.nz <br />
Assessor Use Only:<br />
Accepted responses (assessor name):<br />
Verification Provided (yes/no and date if known):<br />
Question signed off (date):<br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28521v1: 3.2, US28536v1: 1.3, 2.4<br />
Evidence: The Learner has described the incident and completed the questions which constitute the<br />
Community Connections incident/accident/issue of concern report.<br />
Judgement: The Learner has described the reluctance to get changed, the bruise and the PRN medication as<br />
issues of concern. The PRN medication is noted for the person supported not knowing what it is for.<br />
Glossary:<br />
Unique – Unusual or special in some way.<br />
Maltreatment – To treat someone cruelly or violently.<br />
Humiliation – To make someone feel ashamed or lose respect for him or herself.<br />
Intimidation – To frighten or threaten someone, usually to get them to do something<br />
that you want them to do.<br />
Assets – Something valuable belonging to a person.<br />
Willfully – Done on purpose, even though you know it’s wrong.<br />
Transparency – Being done in an open way without secrets.<br />
Sought – Asked for advice or approval etc.<br />
Vigilant – Always being careful to notice things, especially things that might be a<br />
danger.<br />
YAH!<br />
You’ve completed Book One!<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 77
Coordinator Verification:<br />
ETHICAL AND PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIOUR <br />
CCLP Book One <br />
Verification Submitted: 7/24/2015 10:08:08 <br />
Name of Learner: Dee Hyde <br />
Coordinator: Bev Pittuck <br />
Coordinator Email: dee.hyde@ccslt.org.nz<br />
I confirm that this learner demonstrates professional and ethical behaviour according to the<br />
standards below:<br />
1. Works within the specifications and boundaries of their role: <br />
Yes<br />
Comment:<br />
Perhaps the best representation of these values and attitudes is the United Nations Convention on<br />
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This is a document that NZ signed up to in 2008 and<br />
underpins all policy and practicing standards in New Zealand.<br />
2. Behaves professionally and ethically in all work activities. <br />
Yes<br />
Comment:<br />
Perhaps the best representation of these values and attitudes is the United Nations Convention on<br />
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This is a document that NZ signed up to in 2008 and<br />
underpins all policy and practicing standards in New Zealand.<br />
3. Behaves professionally and ethically in their interactions with others. <br />
No<br />
Comment:<br />
Perhaps the best representation of these values and attitudes is the United Nations Convention on<br />
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This is a document that NZ signed up to in 2008 and<br />
underpins all policy and practicing standards in New Zealand.<br />
4. Addresses ethical issues, grievances and/or disputes according to Community <br />
Connections policy and procedure. <br />
Yes<br />
Comment:<br />
Perhaps the best representation of these values and attitudes is the United Nations Convention on<br />
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This is a document that NZ signed up to in 2008 and<br />
underpins all policy and practicing standards in New Zealand.<br />
5. Maintains professional, cultural and age-‐appropriate physical, emotional, sexual and <br />
spiritual boundaries at all times. <br />
Yes<br />
78
Comment:<br />
Perhaps the best representation of these values and attitudes is the United Nations Convention on<br />
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This is a document that NZ signed up to in 2008 and<br />
underpins all policy and practicing standards in New Zealand.<br />
6. Works within relevant legislation and/or Community Connections policies and <br />
procedures at all times. <br />
No<br />
Comment:<br />
Perhaps the best representation of these values and attitudes is the United Nations Convention on<br />
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This is a document that NZ signed up to in 2008 and<br />
underpins all policy and practicing standards in New Zealand.<br />
Assessor Comments: <br />
Unit Standard and Elements: US28542v1: 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4.<br />
Evidence: Coordinator (Verifier) has confirmed that the learner is observed as working<br />
professionally and ethically – and according to Community Connections Policies and Procedures.<br />
The Coordinator has also confirmed that the learner is observed as using appropriate processes<br />
around ethical issues that arise and also that the learner is observed to be maintaining<br />
professional and ethical boundaries.<br />
Judgement: The verifier has provided sufficient detail in their comments as to establish confidence<br />
in the efficacy of the observations.<br />
CCLPv2 010116 :: Page 79