Opportunity Youth: Disenfranchised Young People

More documents

Recommendations

Info

37 Program 2007-2011 Evaluation Type Target Group Program Model Summary of Findings Evaluation Dates Employment-focused programs: completed evaluations Year Up Impact 18- to 24-year-olds with secondary credentials P/PV Sectoral Study of Jewish Vocational Service and Per Scholas Impact Young people and adults over age 18 with secondary credentials Employment-focused programs: evaluations in process Year Up Impact 18- to 24-year-olds with secondary credentials Young Adult Internship Program Impact 16- to 24-year-olds not working and not in school Bridges to Pathways Impact Young men ages 16 to 20 who are leaving juvenile detention Comprehensive youth programs: completed evaluations Job Corps Impact, implementation Disadvantaged young people ages 16 to 24 Technical skills training in information technology or investment operations for 6 months, followed by 6 months of internship; stipend for both components Training tied to a specific sector (health care, information technology); other forms of support including job placement, child care and transportation assistance, and postprogram follow-up Technical skills training in information technology or investment operations for 6 months, followed by 6 months of internship; stipend for both components Work-readiness training, 10-week paid internship, transition support Transitional jobs program that includes online educational support, mentoring, and socialemotional/cognitive behavioral programs Employment, education, and training in a (mostly) residential setting Earnings impacts in Years 2 and 3, driven by higher hourly wages for program participants Employment and earnings impacts for young people Earnings and employment impacts in Years 3 to 4 of the study period, impacts faded after Year 4; results stronger for older young adults 2003-2006 Early impact results expected in 2016 Impact results expected in 2017 Impact results expected in 2017 1994-2003
Findings expected in 2016 Findings expected in 2016 Interim impacts and implementation study in 2017; cost study, final impacts in 2018 38 Program Evaluation Type Target Group Program Model Summary of Findings Evaluation Dates Comprehensive youth programs: completed evaluations (continued) ChalleNGe Impact, 2005-2008 implementation High school dropouts, ages 16 to 18, who are drug free and not heavily involved with the justice system Youth Corps Impact 18- to 25-year-old, outof-school young people, mostly dropouts Project Rise Implementation 16- to 24-year-olds without secondary credentials Comprehensive youth programs: evaluations in process YouthBuild Impact, implementation Disadvantaged young people ages 16 to 24 Education, service to the community, and other forms of support in a quasi-military residential setting; 12-month postresidential mentoring program Paid work experience in community service projects, education and training, support services through case management; typical participation full time and intended to last from 6 to 12 months Career-readiness and educational programs combined with a conditional internship Education and job training, combined with community service and additional support; stipend for most participants Increases in high school equivalency credentials; earning and employment impacts in Year 3 First evaluation: increases in employment and decreases in arrests, particularly for black males; second evaluation: no impacts on employment Implementation findings discuss challenges implementing internship and engagement Implementation findings: program largely implemented with fidelity 1993-1996 2006-2009 2011- 2015 2010-2018; early impact findings expected in 2017 Los Angeles Reconnections Career Academy Linking Innovation and Knowledge (@LIKE) Impact, implementation, and costeffectiveness Impact (quasiexperimental) and cost study PACE Center for Girls Impact, implementation, and costeffectiveness High school dropouts ages 16 to 24 18- to 24-year-olds who have been out of work and school for more than 90 days Girls ages 12 to 17 who have dropped out or who are at risk of dropping out Connection to secondary education and subsidized vocational training in health care Connection to secondary education and vocational training, life coaches, and transition support Academic services to support attainment of secondary credentials, life- and career-skills education, counseling, and connection to support services
Page 2 and 3:
Turning the Improbable Into the Exc
Page 4 and 5:
Page 4 of 72
Page 6 and 7:
Page 6 of 72
Page 8 and 9:
6. 1 We disseminate Quarterly publi
Page 10 and 11:
Page 10 of 72
Page 12 and 13:
Page 12 of 72
Page 14 and 15:
Page 14 of 72
Page 16 and 17:
Analysis has also examined the econ
Page 18 and 19:
Larkin Street Lyric National Fund f
Page 20 and 21:
success stories all around the coun
Page 22 and 23:
meaningful, and community-enhancing
Page 24 and 25:
There are also empowerment movement
Page 26 and 27:
Educational activities that cite yo
Page 28 and 29:
Page 28 of 72
Page 30 and 31:
they will be on the way to a hopefu
Page 32 and 33:
provide recognition for positive be
Page 34 and 35:
the Caribbean to Central and South
Page 36 and 37:
In 2006 the Commonwealth Youth Prog
Page 38 and 39:
Participation," this spectrum ident
Page 40 and 41: Page 40 of 72
Page 42 and 43: who exhibit other problem behaviors
Page 44 and 45: Notes _____________________________
Page 46 and 47: Page 46 of 72
Page 48 and 49: MDRC Working Paper What Works for D
Page 50: Overview This paper was commissione
Page 54: Acknowledgments We are grateful to
Page 57 and 58: • Programs share some common impl
Page 59 and 60: Public Schools The public school sy
Page 61 and 62: In 2014, the company offering the G
Page 63 and 64: their education and move up the car
Page 65 and 66: terest in city-level Reengagement C
Page 67 and 68: social development, mental health,
Page 69 and 70: tials. 36 These numbers indicate th
Page 71 and 72: focus on recruiting young people wh
Page 73 and 74: they were considering pursuing. 49
Page 75 and 76: evaluation of CEPS also found that
Page 77 and 78: Behavioral Interventions Many menta
Page 79 and 80: • Strong links among education, t
Page 81 and 82: participation, and many communities
Page 83 and 84: y the end of the reporting period.
Page 85 and 86: these disincentives, however, a num
Page 87 and 88: programs specifically target the mo
Page 90: Appendix Selected Evaluations of Pr
Page 95 and 96: 2009-2012 Varies Program 2012-2014
Page 98 and 99: References American Institutes for
Page 100 and 101: Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initi
Page 102 and 103: Sparks, Sarah D. 2015. “Many Drop
Page 104 and 105: About MDRC MDRC is a nonprofit, non
Page 106 and 107: Attachment B Disconnected Youth: A
Page 108 and 109: Disconnected Youth: A Look at 16 to
Page 142 and 143:
Disconnected Youth: A Look at 16 to
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 50 of 72
Page 150 and 151:
2/9/2018 Disconnected Youth: Out of
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Advocacy Foundation Publishers Page
Page 160 and 161:
Issue Title Quarterly Vol. I 2015 T
Page 162 and 163:
Issue Title Quarterly Vol. V 2019 O
Page 164 and 165:
LI Nonprofit Confidentiality In The
Page 166 and 167:
Vol. XVIII 2032 Public Policy LXXVI
Page 168 and 169:
Legal Missions International Page 6
Page 170 and 171:
XVII Russia Q-1 2019 XVIII Australi
Page 172 and 173:
The e-Advocate Newsletter Genesis o
Page 174 and 175:
Extras The Nonprofit Advisors Group
Page 176 and 177:
www.TheAdvocacyFoundation.org Page
show all

Opportunity Youth: Disenfranchised Young People

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?