Views
8 months ago

376190585-ISLAMIC-GOD-IS-KNOWABLE-BUT-NOT-COMPREHENSIBLE-BY-FINITE-KNOWLEDGES-OF-FINITE-SUPPOSITA

Page 10 of 36 Knowledge

Page 10 of 36 Knowledge of Actuality of Human Nature [T1] and the Knowledge of Actuality of Assumption of Human Nature [T3] then there is no implication that their Knowledges implieth the Knowledge of their Potentialities [P1,P2] and the Holder of their Potentialities [The Hypostasis]. But the Knowledge OF Potentiality say P1 cannot be posterior to the Knowledge of the thing say T1 which is actualized from Potentiality in the Thing T2. This shews that God , Godhead of God and the Hypostasis in the Godhead of God [If there is any in Godhead] can be known without the Human Nature and the Assumption Of Human Nature [If there are some]. The Knowledge of Hypostasis in Godhead of God [if there is any ] can be attained with out the Assumption of the Human Nature and the Human Nature itself. If the Male Human Nature [T1] and Assumption of Male Human Nature [T3] cannot be known without their Potentialities P1,P2 being Known then as the Potentialities [P1,P2] and the thing [t2] in which these two [T1,T3] are, are Logically Prior to them [T1,T2].So the Knowledges of respective Potentialities [P1,P2] and the Thing [T2] is prior to the Respective Knowledges of [T1,T3]. So it requireth that the respective Knowledges of P1,P2,T2, MUST exist prior to the respective Knowledges of T1,T3.How ever it may be argued that this Priority is only Logical and not of Time. But this argumentation is incorrect and wrong.Since the Potentialities and the Holder of these Potentialites canbe known even if the Actualization of Potentialities hath not Occurred. This meaneth that the Hypostasis and each one of the Potentialities in the Hypostasis canbe Known even if there actualization do not occur , or if it occurs even then it is not necessarily Known [Not the case “Necessarily Not Known”]. As Incarnation , Human Nature, Assumption of Human Nature etc. are Relative(ly) Necessary and Not Absolute(ly) Necessary, [in Trinitarian Christology] there fore they are Absolute(ly) Contingent. No Contingent is Absolute(ly) Necessary for Knowing the Absolute (ly) Necessary Being. Note 1:=The Term Motion may be defined as the Transition [‘Intiqa:l] of some thing say T1 from the Domain of Potentiality /Potency into the line of Actuality in a thing T2 ,which is in Actualization and not in Potency. This Motion may be termed as Actualization. Page 10 of 36

Page 11 of 36 Note 2: There are Potencies/Potentialities of Male Human Nature and the Assumption of Human Nature in the Hypostasis under discussion. If there is neither Any Potentialty/Potency of any Male Human Nature nor any Potency/Potentiality of Assumption of Male Human Nature in the Hypostasis in the Godhead [Divine Ousia] of God, then Neither the Male Human Nature can be made in the Hypostasis not can be assumed by the Hypostasis. So it is necessary to assume that each one of the two Potentialities/Potencies are held by the Hypostasis in Itself AND also that these Potentialies/Potencies are Prior to the Transition of the Male Human Nature and the Assumption of the Male Human Nature from their respective Potentialities /Potencies to their respective lines of Actualization. Note 3:= If the Male Human Nature and the Assumption Of the Male Human Nature are not one and the same ‘ then they must occur simultaneously . Note 4:= If the Male Human Nature and the Assumption of Male Human Nature are not one and the same then their respective Potentialities/Potencies are also not one and the same. Note 5:= If the Male Human Nature and the Assumption of Male Human Nature are one and the same then their respective Potentialities/Potencies are also one and the same. Note 6:= It is beyond the scope of this article to Discuss the Possibility and Impossibility of Assumption Of Human Nature [Incarnation]. ELEVENTH PRELIMINARY None of the official and Authentic Trinitarians have claimed that Incarnation is the Only Way to Know God. . Since their Great Theologians have tried to Prove God based on Reason/Argumentation. These Proofs [whether correct or not is an other issue] do have Page 11 of 36

Controversial Questions about Islam
The Illustrated Encyclopaedia of Islam: A Comprehensive Guide to the History, Philosophy and Practice of Islam ePub
al-Attas: Islamization of contemporary knowledge - Epistemology
The Sources of Islamic Revolutionary Conduct - Higgins ...
Volume 13 Surah 26 - 32 - Enjoy Islam
Volume 12 Surah 21 - 25 - Enjoy Islam
Islam: Evil In The Name Of God - Preface & Contents
islamic way of life - Enjoy Islam
Volume 1 Surah 1 and 2 - Enjoy Islam
Sufi Introduction to the 99 Names of Allah and sufi ... - Deen islam
The Revenge of God: The Resurgence of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism in the Modern World Online
Doctrines of Shi_i Islam
The Manners Of the Knowledge Seeker - Mission Islam
The Original and Present Reality - World Of Islam Portal
Mystical Dimensions of Islam
AHL-i ALLAH: Forward To Eden - Shri Adi Shakti: The Kingdom Of God
Practicing Islam: Knowledge, Experience, and Social Navigation in Kyrgyzstan (Central Eurasia in Context) ePub
Clement of Alexandria and the Beginnings of Christian Apophaticism
Is Jesus God? , The Bible says No - Mission Islam
Islam and Tantra - Shri Adi Shakti: The Kingdom Of God
to download - The Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre
The Sakti of Islam - Shri Adi Shakti: The Kingdom Of God
One-Fold God - Shri Adi Shakti: The Kingdom Of God
Self Building An Islamic Guide For Spiritual Migration Towards God