376190585-ISLAMIC-GOD-IS-KNOWABLE-BUT-NOT-COMPREHENSIBLE-BY-FINITE-KNOWLEDGES-OF-FINITE-SUPPOSITA

Page 30 of 36
The word Capricious is easy to use in any sentence. Give a child this word and ask him/her to
make a sentence, it is likely that he/she may make a sensible sentence. But it is very difficult to
prove that God of Islam is Capricious. If Not to be incarnable is to hide then this means that
atleast 3/4 of the Trinity is Hiding and only ¼ of the Trinity is not hiding in the sense of
incarnation. But even the Hypostasis Logos is Hiding in the Godhead which is the Barrier
between the Created Human beings in particular and all created living Beings in general out of
It [Godhead] and the Hypostases in It [Godhead]. The human nature [which is not even a
human person] cannot break this Barrior.
God is hidden in the meaning that God cannot be Comprehended by Human Rationality and
Human Knowledge. Only God Comprehendeth Himself. On the other hand if God is known
without being Comprehended by Created Rational Supposita , Incarnation is neither a
Sufficient Condition nor a Necessary Condition. So this is the actual point missed by the Anti
Islamic Objection Makers of this type.
But one may be quite astonished that how frequently An Anti Islamic Objection Maker is
repeating the same axiom some time explicitly and some timeexplicitly. Some time as a
substratum. This is not the way to refute other religions.
ANTI ISLAMIC OBJECTION MAKER SAYS
The main message of the Bible is that Yehovah God wants a close, personal and intimate relationship
with you (cf. John 14:17, 20, 23; 17:3; Ephesians 1:17; 1st John 2:3-4; 4:7-8).
ANSWER:=
God Doeth Want to make relations with His Created Rational Supposita , But what type of this
relation or relationship is this. If it is a relation due to the Assumption of Human Nature what is
often called Incarnation in particular and Manifestation in General then this relation is
certainly not required to Know God without Comprehending God and Understanding God
without Comprehending God. Once again the learned Auther has used the Noun Yahuvah
[Iahuvah] . Once again it is necessary to repeat that Yahuvah/Yahvah/Yehveh is the God of
Judaism, and Tanakh is the Holy Book of Judaism which Christianity has borrowed from
Judaism. So when making Commentaries of Verses , Explaining the Verses of Tanakh one must
primarily look at the Commentaries and Explanations of Judaism and not of a Religion which
borrows the Book and is not the Original Holder of the Book. What Yahuvah wanteth is a
question which Judaism can say in a far better way then Christianity since it is not the Original
Holder of the Book. If Babies and Bahais take verses from NT and interpret in their own way,
Christians say that their explanations are invalid since NT is not their original book . The same is
true for Judaism. First of all Judaism to which Tanakh originally belongs to does not teach the
Page 30 of 36