14.12.2012 Views

Building a U.S. Coast Guard for the 21st Century - Center for ...

Building a U.S. Coast Guard for the 21st Century - Center for ...

Building a U.S. Coast Guard for the 21st Century - Center for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>for</strong> a second Virginia-class submarine, an arguably unnecessary expense in <strong>the</strong><br />

post-Cold War world. That money could help <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> buy new ships<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e large parts of its current fleet are <strong>for</strong>ced into retirement.<br />

Immediately increase <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> budget by $5 billion<br />

Congress should increase <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong>’s budget by $5 billion per year to about<br />

$15 billion a year. Funding should remain level in real terms <strong>for</strong> at least five years<br />

so that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> can manage its acquisitions programs rationally.<br />

Fully fund <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong>’s asset recapitalization program with<br />

appropriate oversight<br />

As <strong>the</strong> service’s response to <strong>the</strong> Haiti earthquake demonstrated, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong>’s<br />

aging fleet is already severely crimping its operational capacity. As noted above,<br />

this capacity deficit is likely to increase in <strong>the</strong> future should <strong>the</strong> service’s new<br />

assets not come on line according to <strong>the</strong>ir current schedule.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> service must move <strong>for</strong>ward with its asset recapitalization plan while<br />

providing increased oversight at all stages in <strong>the</strong> procurement process (more<br />

details on necessary oversight measures will be discussed in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong><br />

recapitalization section). But funding <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> modernization program should not<br />

come at <strong>the</strong> expense of current operational capacity. Instead Congress should<br />

adhere to two principles:<br />

Don’t raid one <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> account to fund ano<strong>the</strong>r account<br />

The <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> must not be <strong>for</strong>ced to choose between funding its Acquisitions,<br />

Construction, and Improvements, AC&I account, which funds asset modernization,<br />

and its Operating Expenses, or OE account, which funds its day-to-day operations.<br />

The <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> should not have to choose between reducing funds <strong>for</strong> current<br />

assets and missions to increasing funds <strong>for</strong> its asset modernization program, which<br />

it concedes is its main budget priority. <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> leadership should work with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Congress to identify budgetary gaps in <strong>the</strong> service’s FY 2011 budget that will<br />

affect <strong>the</strong> service’s operations and ensure that those gaps are filled.<br />

15 <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> American Progress | <strong>Building</strong> a U.S. <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>21st</strong> <strong>Century</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!