14.12.2012 Views

Building a U.S. Coast Guard for the 21st Century - Center for ...

Building a U.S. Coast Guard for the 21st Century - Center for ...

Building a U.S. Coast Guard for the 21st Century - Center for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of new polar icebreakers, or that <strong>the</strong> ships could be purchased through DOD (<strong>the</strong><br />

procedure used to procure <strong>the</strong> Healy). But <strong>the</strong> NSF option in particular would<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r erode <strong>the</strong> USCG’s control over its own assets and should be avoided.<br />

According to <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> estimates, <strong>the</strong> new icebreakers would cost between<br />

$800 million to $925 million per ship, a necessary cost that would undoubtedly<br />

entail increasing <strong>the</strong> USCG’s budget over <strong>the</strong> next decade. 113 This additional cost<br />

should not be used to justify reducing funding <strong>for</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> accounts.<br />

Ensure <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> budgetary control over <strong>the</strong> refurbished Polar Star in <strong>the</strong><br />

short term<br />

Given future projections <strong>for</strong> Arctic warming and expanded U.S. and international<br />

activities in <strong>the</strong> region, <strong>the</strong> current budget arrangement with <strong>the</strong> National Science<br />

Foundation is unsustainable in <strong>the</strong> long term. Yet increased U.S. responsibilities in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Arctic should not come at <strong>the</strong> cost of degrading our arctic research capabilities.<br />

The National Science Foundation has been able to conduct its research without<br />

use of <strong>the</strong> Polar Star since it was put into caretaker status in 2006. There<strong>for</strong>e it<br />

makes sense that <strong>the</strong> refurbished Polar Star could be devoted entirely to USCG<br />

missions when it returns to service in 2013, and be funded through DHS. This<br />

option would increase <strong>the</strong> ability of our <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong>smen and women to gain<br />

vital experience operating in <strong>the</strong> arctic environment.<br />

Congress should ratify <strong>the</strong> U.N. Convention on <strong>the</strong> Law of <strong>the</strong> Sea<br />

There are benefits in this treaty <strong>for</strong> just about everyone, including environmentalists,<br />

business associations, oil, shipping, and fishing companies, and <strong>the</strong> Navy<br />

and <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong>—all of whom support ratification. Moreover, both Democratic<br />

and Republican lawmakers are largely in favor despite <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> treaty has<br />

languished in <strong>the</strong> Senate since <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s.<br />

Not only will <strong>the</strong> treaty have meaningful applications in <strong>the</strong> open seas, but <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> sees <strong>the</strong> treaty as a critical tool to enhance port security. Today, <strong>the</strong><br />

need <strong>for</strong> binding rules of <strong>the</strong> road regarding <strong>the</strong> world’s oceans is clear and <strong>the</strong><br />

administration and Congress should act accordingly.<br />

49 <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> American Progress | <strong>Building</strong> a U.S. <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>21st</strong> <strong>Century</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!