14.12.2012 Views

Building a U.S. Coast Guard for the 21st Century - Center for ...

Building a U.S. Coast Guard for the 21st Century - Center for ...

Building a U.S. Coast Guard for the 21st Century - Center for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

does not simply develop FY 2011 per<strong>for</strong>mance targets based on <strong>the</strong> new DOD<br />

system. Indeed, a <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> memorandum from April 2009 reveals that <strong>the</strong><br />

service has been planning <strong>for</strong> this transition <strong>for</strong> some time. 55<br />

Recommendations<br />

Maintain current readiness reporting standards until <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong><br />

Readiness Reporting System is fully operational<br />

A November 2009 DHS inspector general’s report indicated that <strong>the</strong> USCG<br />

was working to develop a <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> Readiness Reporting System that would<br />

be in alignment with DOD’s new Defense Readiness Reporting System. Until<br />

that system is implemented, however, “<strong>the</strong> Navy has agreed to keep <strong>the</strong> Status of<br />

Resources and Training System, or SORTS, functional so that <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> assets<br />

can continue to report readiness to Department of Defense commands.” 56<br />

Developing new methodology <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> FY 2011 measures based on SORTS,<br />

as GAO indicated is <strong>the</strong> case, thus appears to be an unnecessary undertaking.<br />

Speeding development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong>’s new system would be a better use<br />

of resources than developing new per<strong>for</strong>mance targets <strong>for</strong> an obsolete system.<br />

The USCG should maintain current readiness reporting standards until <strong>the</strong> new<br />

system is operational.<br />

Allow <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> commandant to become a voting member of <strong>the</strong><br />

Joint Chiefs of Staff<br />

All of <strong>the</strong> nation’s armed services housed in <strong>the</strong> Department of Defense—<strong>the</strong><br />

Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps—are voting members of <strong>the</strong> Joint Chiefs<br />

of Staff. This council of military advisors has traditionally not included <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong><br />

<strong>Guard</strong> commandant, even though <strong>the</strong> USCG is a military service and can be tasked<br />

to support <strong>the</strong> Navy when it is conducting combat operations as it has done in<br />

Korea, Vietnam, and <strong>the</strong> two Persian Gulf wars.<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> key role of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> in homeland security, an area which is an<br />

increasingly important component of U.S. national security, as well as its support<br />

of U.S. interests and operations overseas, this arrangement does not give<br />

full respect to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong>’s ability to contribute to our national defense.<br />

27 <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> American Progress | <strong>Building</strong> a U.S. <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Guard</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>21st</strong> <strong>Century</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!