17.12.2012 Views

Bryson•s Dictionary for Writers and Editors

Bryson•s Dictionary for Writers and Editors

Bryson•s Dictionary for Writers and Editors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dos <strong>and</strong> don’ts / double negatives � 101<br />

dos <strong>and</strong> don’ts. Not do’s.<br />

Dosewallips River, Washington.<br />

Dos Passos, John. (1896–1970) American writer.<br />

Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, is the commonest spelling of the name of the<br />

Russian novelist (1821–1881), but there are many possible variants<br />

<strong>for</strong> both names.<br />

double meanings. Anyone who has written headlines <strong>for</strong> a living will<br />

know the embarrassment that comes from causing hilarity to a<br />

large group of people by writing an inadvertently two-faced<br />

headline. I have no doubt that someone at the Toronto Globe <strong>and</strong><br />

Mail is still cringing at having written “Upturns May Indicate<br />

Some Bottoms Touched” (cited in Punch), as must earlier have<br />

been the author of the oft-quoted <strong>and</strong> variously attributed<br />

“MacArthur Flies Back to Front.” It is always worth remembering<br />

that many words carry a range of meanings, or function as<br />

both nouns <strong>and</strong> verbs, <strong>and</strong> consequently offer unexpected opportunities<br />

<strong>for</strong> mischief.<br />

double negatives. Most people know you shouldn’t say “I haven’t had<br />

no dinner,” but some writers, doubtless more out of haste than<br />

ignorance, sometimes perpetrate sentences that are scarcely less<br />

jarring, as here: “Str<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>and</strong> uncertain of their location, the<br />

survivors endured <strong>for</strong> six days without hardly a trace of food”<br />

(Chicago Tribune). Since hardly, like scarcely, has the grammatical<br />

effect of a negative, it requires no further negation. Make it<br />

“with hardly.”<br />

Some usage guides flatly condemn all double negatives, but<br />

there is one kind, in which a negative in the main clause is paralleled<br />

in a subordinate construction, that we might view more<br />

tolerantly. Evans cites this sentence from Jane Austen: “There<br />

was none too poor or remote not to feel an interest.” And Shakespeare<br />

wrote: “Nor what he said, though it lacked <strong>for</strong>m a little,<br />

was not like madness.” But such constructions must be consid-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!