01.02.2019 Views

atw 2019-02

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 64 (<strong>2019</strong>) | Issue 2 ı February<br />

ENVIRONMENT AND SAFETY 96<br />

started by the connected protection<br />

and control signals, and the operation<br />

history of these safety systems is<br />

recorded on the SOER/Alarm List.<br />

Thus, as a means to analyze system<br />

behaviors, this research focuses on the<br />

SOER/Alarm List as it contains information<br />

on actual abnormal events<br />

that took place in the plants.<br />

Basically, the introduced method<br />

determines the behavior adequacy of<br />

systems in the following manners: two<br />

comparable events are selected and<br />

the SOER/Alarm List of each event is<br />

collected. Then, one SOER/Alarm List<br />

is set as a standard point, and the<br />

other List is moved towards the<br />

standard point to check whether their<br />

alarm names are matching.<br />

The existing string-searching algorithms,<br />

including Sing-Pattern Algorithm,<br />

Native String Search, Knuth-<br />

Morris-Pratt Algorithm, calculates the<br />

percentage of matching words or<br />

sentences in the TEXT being analyzed<br />

as compared to a reference text.[2, 3]<br />

However, if SOER/Alarm lists are<br />

compared with each other using the<br />

existing string-searching algorithms,<br />

the result would simply be the mere<br />

comparison of words or sentences,<br />

rather than an insights into plant’s<br />

physical phenomena (for example,<br />

dead band of alarming actuation<br />

signal, differences caused by system<br />

scan times, etc.) and deeper understanding<br />

of the conditions (for<br />

example, dropping of rods in the<br />

sequence of number 1, 2 and 3, as<br />

compared to 2, 3, and 1). Drawing<br />

such a simple percentage does not<br />

help anyone to understand actual<br />

phenomena that took place in the<br />

plants. To address this situation, this<br />

research p aper intends to introduce<br />

an analysis method of comparing the<br />

SOER/Alarm lists to get the similarity<br />

analysis of system behaviors during<br />

the plant abnormal conditions.<br />

The stages of the SOER/Alarm list<br />

comparative analysis are as follows:<br />

pp<br />

Compare and analyze the number<br />

of matching alarm types between<br />

the lists;<br />

pp<br />

Analyze the weighted value to be<br />

applied on the similarity results;<br />

and<br />

pp<br />

Compensate considering the total<br />

number of alarms on the SOER/<br />

Alarm List.<br />

Considering the above conditions, a<br />

computing program has been developed<br />

in order to conduct the behavior<br />

similarity analysis on the abnormal<br />

plant conditions. When the SOER/<br />

Alarm Lists recorded during the<br />

abnormal conditions are registered into<br />

the program, it generates the<br />

following analysis based on Microsoft’s<br />

Excel as well as Visual-Basic;<br />

pp<br />

Removal of reset alarms on the<br />

SOER/Alarm List;<br />

pp<br />

Acquiring selective reset information<br />

on the SOER/Alarm List;<br />

pp<br />

Arranging alarm names by time on<br />

the SOER/Alarm List;<br />

pp<br />

Arranging systems by time on the<br />

SOER/Alarm List; and<br />

pp<br />

Data processing programming on<br />

the SOER/Alarm List.<br />

3) The result of case analysis<br />

to verify and utilize the<br />

computer program<br />

Two similar events were selected that<br />

occurred in the plants with same reactor<br />

type to apply the SOER/Alarm List<br />

methodology, which is featured in this<br />

research. One event involved a reactor<br />

trip caused by a single reactor coolant<br />

pump (RCP) shutting down, while the<br />

other involved a reactor trip by two<br />

RCPs stopping. Both the power plants<br />

had a 2-loop system and the RCPs<br />

stopped in a different loop in each<br />

case. The result generated by using<br />

the SOER/Alarm List methodology<br />

and tools to analyze system behaviors<br />

Order System Weighted Value Compensation Factor Result<br />

1 13.8kV Power System - - -<br />

2 Reactor Coolant System 0 % 0.5 0 %<br />

3 Reactor Trip Switch Gear System 100 % 1 100 %<br />

4 Control Element Drive Mechanism 100 % 1 100 %<br />

5 Main Turbine system 87.18 % 0.886 77.27 %<br />

6 Turbine Hydraulic Fluid 100 % 1 100 %<br />

7 Steam Bypass Control System 100 % 1 100 %<br />

8 Reactor Power Cutback system 100 % 1 100 %<br />

9 Main Power System 100 % 1 100 %<br />

10 Feed Water System 100 % 1 100 %<br />

11 Reactor Protection System 75 % 0.8 60 %<br />

12 Main Steam System 78.26 % 0.958 75 %<br />

| | Tab. 2.<br />

Analysis result on the system adequacy and similarity of two events.<br />

of two events is featured in following<br />

Table 2.<br />

The analysis on the behaviors and<br />

similarity of these two events concluded<br />

that their system behaviors<br />

during the transient status were<br />

approximately 82.93 % similar. Moreover,<br />

additional analysis on the<br />

systems with dissimilar behaviors<br />

revealed that there was one valve out<br />

of many in the main steam bypass<br />

system that was abnormal.<br />

Based on the result of behavior and<br />

similarity analysis of each system, the<br />

methodology and analysis tools were<br />

verified to be useful in analyzing<br />

behavior adequacy and similarity of<br />

plant systems. As the previously mentioned<br />

result indicates, the method of<br />

analyzing the system behaviors by<br />

comparing similar events not only<br />

helps in determining the behavior<br />

adequacy of systems according to its<br />

design, but also in identifying the<br />

system with abnormal behavior and<br />

conducting cause analysis so that it<br />

can be used for the plant maintenance<br />

activities.<br />

3 Conclusion<br />

The analysis result generated by using<br />

the suggested methodology in this<br />

research paper showed that these two<br />

events showed a high level of similarity<br />

in terms of their behaviors<br />

during abnormal conditions. Furthermore,<br />

the result found that system<br />

behaviors were adequate, while few<br />

systems did not behave as it is supposed<br />

to have according to its design.<br />

As such, by utilizing the method to<br />

analyze similarities of events that<br />

occurred during abnormal situations,<br />

the behavior adequacy of plant<br />

systems could be determined as well<br />

as identify the systems with abnormal<br />

behaviors and gain insights for cause<br />

analysis. The computer program<br />

developed as part of the research also<br />

proved to be useful for the behavior<br />

analysis of plant systems in abnormal<br />

conditions. Thus, the expectation of<br />

the safer operation of the plants would<br />

be possible when using the analysis<br />

methodology; it offers a prompt<br />

and standardized behavior adequacy<br />

analysis as well as a cause analysis<br />

of the systems identified to have<br />

abnormal behaviors.<br />

4 Further study<br />

In order to use the method suggested<br />

in this research as an analysis tool in a<br />

more effective and prompt way, it<br />

would be necessary to establish standards<br />

for various abnormal situations<br />

and further verify this method. After<br />

Environment and Safety<br />

Research for the Adequacy Analysis of Plant System Behaviors During Abnormal Conditions ı Yeong Jin Yu , Ho Cheul Shin and Jae Heung Lee

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!