atw 2019-02
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 64 (<strong>2019</strong>) | Issue 2 ı February<br />
ENVIRONMENT AND SAFETY 96<br />
started by the connected protection<br />
and control signals, and the operation<br />
history of these safety systems is<br />
recorded on the SOER/Alarm List.<br />
Thus, as a means to analyze system<br />
behaviors, this research focuses on the<br />
SOER/Alarm List as it contains information<br />
on actual abnormal events<br />
that took place in the plants.<br />
Basically, the introduced method<br />
determines the behavior adequacy of<br />
systems in the following manners: two<br />
comparable events are selected and<br />
the SOER/Alarm List of each event is<br />
collected. Then, one SOER/Alarm List<br />
is set as a standard point, and the<br />
other List is moved towards the<br />
standard point to check whether their<br />
alarm names are matching.<br />
The existing string-searching algorithms,<br />
including Sing-Pattern Algorithm,<br />
Native String Search, Knuth-<br />
Morris-Pratt Algorithm, calculates the<br />
percentage of matching words or<br />
sentences in the TEXT being analyzed<br />
as compared to a reference text.[2, 3]<br />
However, if SOER/Alarm lists are<br />
compared with each other using the<br />
existing string-searching algorithms,<br />
the result would simply be the mere<br />
comparison of words or sentences,<br />
rather than an insights into plant’s<br />
physical phenomena (for example,<br />
dead band of alarming actuation<br />
signal, differences caused by system<br />
scan times, etc.) and deeper understanding<br />
of the conditions (for<br />
example, dropping of rods in the<br />
sequence of number 1, 2 and 3, as<br />
compared to 2, 3, and 1). Drawing<br />
such a simple percentage does not<br />
help anyone to understand actual<br />
phenomena that took place in the<br />
plants. To address this situation, this<br />
research p aper intends to introduce<br />
an analysis method of comparing the<br />
SOER/Alarm lists to get the similarity<br />
analysis of system behaviors during<br />
the plant abnormal conditions.<br />
The stages of the SOER/Alarm list<br />
comparative analysis are as follows:<br />
pp<br />
Compare and analyze the number<br />
of matching alarm types between<br />
the lists;<br />
pp<br />
Analyze the weighted value to be<br />
applied on the similarity results;<br />
and<br />
pp<br />
Compensate considering the total<br />
number of alarms on the SOER/<br />
Alarm List.<br />
Considering the above conditions, a<br />
computing program has been developed<br />
in order to conduct the behavior<br />
similarity analysis on the abnormal<br />
plant conditions. When the SOER/<br />
Alarm Lists recorded during the<br />
abnormal conditions are registered into<br />
the program, it generates the<br />
following analysis based on Microsoft’s<br />
Excel as well as Visual-Basic;<br />
pp<br />
Removal of reset alarms on the<br />
SOER/Alarm List;<br />
pp<br />
Acquiring selective reset information<br />
on the SOER/Alarm List;<br />
pp<br />
Arranging alarm names by time on<br />
the SOER/Alarm List;<br />
pp<br />
Arranging systems by time on the<br />
SOER/Alarm List; and<br />
pp<br />
Data processing programming on<br />
the SOER/Alarm List.<br />
3) The result of case analysis<br />
to verify and utilize the<br />
computer program<br />
Two similar events were selected that<br />
occurred in the plants with same reactor<br />
type to apply the SOER/Alarm List<br />
methodology, which is featured in this<br />
research. One event involved a reactor<br />
trip caused by a single reactor coolant<br />
pump (RCP) shutting down, while the<br />
other involved a reactor trip by two<br />
RCPs stopping. Both the power plants<br />
had a 2-loop system and the RCPs<br />
stopped in a different loop in each<br />
case. The result generated by using<br />
the SOER/Alarm List methodology<br />
and tools to analyze system behaviors<br />
Order System Weighted Value Compensation Factor Result<br />
1 13.8kV Power System - - -<br />
2 Reactor Coolant System 0 % 0.5 0 %<br />
3 Reactor Trip Switch Gear System 100 % 1 100 %<br />
4 Control Element Drive Mechanism 100 % 1 100 %<br />
5 Main Turbine system 87.18 % 0.886 77.27 %<br />
6 Turbine Hydraulic Fluid 100 % 1 100 %<br />
7 Steam Bypass Control System 100 % 1 100 %<br />
8 Reactor Power Cutback system 100 % 1 100 %<br />
9 Main Power System 100 % 1 100 %<br />
10 Feed Water System 100 % 1 100 %<br />
11 Reactor Protection System 75 % 0.8 60 %<br />
12 Main Steam System 78.26 % 0.958 75 %<br />
| | Tab. 2.<br />
Analysis result on the system adequacy and similarity of two events.<br />
of two events is featured in following<br />
Table 2.<br />
The analysis on the behaviors and<br />
similarity of these two events concluded<br />
that their system behaviors<br />
during the transient status were<br />
approximately 82.93 % similar. Moreover,<br />
additional analysis on the<br />
systems with dissimilar behaviors<br />
revealed that there was one valve out<br />
of many in the main steam bypass<br />
system that was abnormal.<br />
Based on the result of behavior and<br />
similarity analysis of each system, the<br />
methodology and analysis tools were<br />
verified to be useful in analyzing<br />
behavior adequacy and similarity of<br />
plant systems. As the previously mentioned<br />
result indicates, the method of<br />
analyzing the system behaviors by<br />
comparing similar events not only<br />
helps in determining the behavior<br />
adequacy of systems according to its<br />
design, but also in identifying the<br />
system with abnormal behavior and<br />
conducting cause analysis so that it<br />
can be used for the plant maintenance<br />
activities.<br />
3 Conclusion<br />
The analysis result generated by using<br />
the suggested methodology in this<br />
research paper showed that these two<br />
events showed a high level of similarity<br />
in terms of their behaviors<br />
during abnormal conditions. Furthermore,<br />
the result found that system<br />
behaviors were adequate, while few<br />
systems did not behave as it is supposed<br />
to have according to its design.<br />
As such, by utilizing the method to<br />
analyze similarities of events that<br />
occurred during abnormal situations,<br />
the behavior adequacy of plant<br />
systems could be determined as well<br />
as identify the systems with abnormal<br />
behaviors and gain insights for cause<br />
analysis. The computer program<br />
developed as part of the research also<br />
proved to be useful for the behavior<br />
analysis of plant systems in abnormal<br />
conditions. Thus, the expectation of<br />
the safer operation of the plants would<br />
be possible when using the analysis<br />
methodology; it offers a prompt<br />
and standardized behavior adequacy<br />
analysis as well as a cause analysis<br />
of the systems identified to have<br />
abnormal behaviors.<br />
4 Further study<br />
In order to use the method suggested<br />
in this research as an analysis tool in a<br />
more effective and prompt way, it<br />
would be necessary to establish standards<br />
for various abnormal situations<br />
and further verify this method. After<br />
Environment and Safety<br />
Research for the Adequacy Analysis of Plant System Behaviors During Abnormal Conditions ı Yeong Jin Yu , Ho Cheul Shin and Jae Heung Lee