19.02.2019 Views

The Jerusalem Sinner Saved; or Good News for the Vilest of Men by John Bunyan 1689

An encouraging book for those who feel guilty about their sins. It is a wonderful reminder that Christ's grace to his people knows no bounds and that his power to save even the worst sinner is not limited. "I have been vile myself, but I have obtained mercy; and I would have my companions in sin partake of mercy too: and therefore, I have writ this little book." Thus wrote John Bunyan about this unique gem. The premise of this book is that Jesus wanted his disciples to proclaim the gospel to the worst of sinners - those in Jerusalem who crucified their Messiah. To Bunyan's mind, this was the worst possible sin. The apostles were to begin there, with these worst of sinners, because, in Christ's eyes, they had the greatest need. Also, when they believed in Christ, his name would receive the greatest fame, and thus others would be encouraged to come to Christ. The kingdom of Satan would then be weakened, and the tempted and the weak would be helped. Further, the greatest sinners would love Christ the most when saved, and those who refused to repent would be left with no excuse. To Bunyan's way of thinking, this command to preach the gospel to "Jerusalem sinners" shows the gracious intentions of Christ toward men and his sufficiency to save the worst of sinners, and gives encouragement to those who think that their sin is too great to be forgiven.

An encouraging book for those who feel guilty about their sins. It is a wonderful reminder that Christ's grace to his people knows no bounds and that his power to save even the worst sinner is not limited.
"I have been vile myself, but I have obtained mercy; and I would have my companions in sin partake of mercy too: and therefore, I have writ this little book." Thus wrote John Bunyan about this unique gem.
The premise of this book is that Jesus wanted his disciples to proclaim the gospel to the worst of sinners - those in Jerusalem who crucified their Messiah. To Bunyan's mind, this was the worst possible sin. The apostles were to begin there, with these worst of sinners, because, in Christ's eyes, they had the greatest need. Also, when they believed in Christ, his name would receive the greatest fame, and thus others would be encouraged to come to Christ. The kingdom of Satan would then be weakened, and the tempted and the weak would be helped. Further, the greatest sinners would love Christ the most when saved, and those who refused to repent would be left with no excuse. To Bunyan's way of thinking, this command to preach the gospel to "Jerusalem sinners" shows the gracious intentions of Christ toward men and his sufficiency to save the worst of sinners, and gives encouragement to those who think that their sin is too great to be forgiven.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Eighthly, and lastly, Christ Jesus will have mercy to be <strong>of</strong>fered in <strong>the</strong> first<br />

place to <strong>the</strong> biggest sinners; f<strong>or</strong> that <strong>by</strong> that means <strong>the</strong> impenitent that<br />

are left behind will be at <strong>the</strong> judgment <strong>the</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e left without excuse.<br />

God’s w<strong>or</strong>d has two edges; it can cut back-stroke and f<strong>or</strong>e-stroke: if it<br />

doth <strong>the</strong>e no good, it will do <strong>the</strong>e hurt; it is <strong>the</strong> sav<strong>or</strong> <strong>of</strong> life unto life to<br />

those that receive it, but <strong>of</strong> death unto death to <strong>the</strong>m that refuse it; 2<br />

C<strong>or</strong>. ii. 15, 16. But this is not all; <strong>the</strong> tender <strong>of</strong> grace to <strong>the</strong> biggest<br />

sinners in <strong>the</strong> first place, will not only leave <strong>the</strong> rest, <strong>or</strong> those that<br />

refuse it, in a depl<strong>or</strong>able condition, but will also stop <strong>the</strong>ir mouths, and<br />

cut <strong>of</strong>f all pretense to excuse at that day. “If I had not come and spoken<br />

unto <strong>the</strong>m,” saith Christ, “<strong>the</strong>y had not had sin; but now <strong>the</strong>y have no<br />

cloak f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sin,” f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sin <strong>of</strong> persevering in impenitence; Job xv.<br />

22.<br />

But what did he speak to <strong>the</strong>m? Why, even that which I have told you;<br />

to wit, That he has in special a delight in saving <strong>the</strong> biggest sinners. He<br />

spake this in <strong>the</strong> way <strong>of</strong> his doctrine; he spake this in <strong>the</strong> way <strong>of</strong> his<br />

practice, even to <strong>the</strong> pouring out <strong>of</strong> his last breath bef<strong>or</strong>e <strong>the</strong>m; Luke<br />

xxiii. 34.<br />

Now, since this is so, what can <strong>the</strong> condemned at <strong>the</strong> judgment say f<strong>or</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves, why sentence <strong>of</strong> death should not be passed upon <strong>the</strong>m? I<br />

say, what excuse can <strong>the</strong>y make f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong>mselves, when <strong>the</strong>y shall be<br />

asked why <strong>the</strong>y did not in <strong>the</strong> day <strong>of</strong> salvation come to Christ to be<br />

saved? Will <strong>the</strong>y have ground to say to <strong>the</strong> L<strong>or</strong>d, Thou wast only f<strong>or</strong><br />

saving <strong>of</strong> little sinners; and <strong>the</strong>ref<strong>or</strong>e because <strong>the</strong>y were great ones,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y durst not come unto him? <strong>or</strong> that thou hadst not compassion f<strong>or</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> biggest sinners, <strong>the</strong>ref<strong>or</strong>e I died in despair? Will <strong>the</strong>se be excuses<br />

f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, as <strong>the</strong> case now standeth with <strong>the</strong>m? Is <strong>the</strong>re not every where<br />

in God’s book a flat contradiction to this, in multitudes <strong>of</strong> promises, <strong>of</strong><br />

invitations, <strong>of</strong> examples, and <strong>the</strong> like? Alas, alas! <strong>the</strong>re will <strong>the</strong>n be<br />

Page<br />

49 <strong>of</strong> 106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!