Issue 05/2015
bioplasticsMAGAZINE_1505
bioplasticsMAGAZINE_1505
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Basics<br />
together with renowned specialists such as market research<br />
and policy consultancy nova- Institute and the Institute for<br />
Bioplastics and Biocomposites of the University of Applied Arts<br />
and Sciences Hannover (both Germany). Both institutes will<br />
present their latest insights at the 10th European Bioplastics<br />
Conference on 5/6 November <strong>2015</strong> in Berlin and share their<br />
newest data on the biomass available for industrial production<br />
(nova-Institute) as well as different calculation scenarios for<br />
an accurate determination of land-use for biobased plastics<br />
production.<br />
Hans-Josef Endres from the IfBB pointed out that in<br />
order to engage in the discussion on land use for biobased<br />
plastics, accurate calculations are needed. A comprehensive<br />
sensitivity analysis of the IfBB shows that land use calculation<br />
is impacted by a lot of different factors. “We identified strong<br />
impact factors, like the assumed biomass yields, variable crops<br />
producing the same polymer feedstock, different processing<br />
routes for equal bioplastics, postulated biobased amounts<br />
and particularly the inclusion of old economy bioplastics like<br />
cellulosics or even rubber. Other impact factors like allocation<br />
or conversation rates often have a much lower and therefore<br />
overestimated influence on results of land use calculations.”<br />
Florence Aeschelmann and Michael Carus from nova-<br />
Institute confirm that it is important to allocate the land only<br />
to the actual amount of biomass used for the production of<br />
bioplastics: “Only a certain part of the harvested biomass is<br />
used for the production of bio-based polymers – other parts<br />
are used for food, feed or energy.“ The table below shows the<br />
biomass allocation between bio-based plastics and other<br />
uses, the correction factor, and the lower land use number<br />
taking the adopted allocation into account.<br />
Stakeholders interested in this important topic should<br />
not miss this year’s anniversary of the leading bioplastics<br />
conference in Europe.<br />
Bio-based<br />
polymer<br />
Biomass<br />
Bio-based plastics<br />
Biomass allocation to<br />
Food, feed and others<br />
Correction<br />
factor<br />
Land use ha/t<br />
full allocation to<br />
bio-based plastics<br />
Land use ha/t bio-based polymer,<br />
nova-Institute with allocation to all uses<br />
(w. correction factor)<br />
PLA100 Sugar beet 70 % 30 % 0.7 0.18 0.13<br />
PLA100 Sugar cane 30 % 70 % 0.3 0.16 0.<strong>05</strong><br />
PLA100 Wheat 60 % 40 % 0.6 1.04 0.62<br />
PLA100 Corn 75 % 25 % 0.75 0.37 0.28<br />
PET30 Sugar cane 30 % 70 % 0.3 0.08 0.024<br />
PE Sugar cane 30 % 70 % 0.3 0.48 0.14<br />
Source: nova-Institute<br />
www.en.european-bioplastics.org/environment/sustainable-sourcing/land-use/<br />
www.en.european-bioplastics.org/conference/<br />
Global land area<br />
13.4 billion ha = 100 %<br />
Global agricultural area<br />
5 billion ha = 37 %<br />
GLOBAL AGRICULTURAL AREA<br />
Pasture<br />
3.5 billion ha = 70 %*<br />
Arable land**<br />
1.4 billion ha = 30 %*<br />
Food & Feed<br />
1.24 billion ha = 26 %*<br />
Material use<br />
106 million ha = 2 %*<br />
Biofuels<br />
53 million ha = 1 %*<br />
Source: European Bioplastics | Institute for Bioplastics and<br />
Biocomposites, nova-Institute (October <strong>2015</strong>)<br />
Bioplastics<br />
2013: 0.6 million ha = 0.01 %*<br />
2018: 1.3 million ha = 0.02 %*<br />
* In relation to global agricultural area<br />
** Also includes 1 % fallow land<br />
bioplastics MAGAZINE [<strong>05</strong>/15] Vol. 10 49