20.12.2012 Views

FR AB - Science Reference

FR AB - Science Reference

FR AB - Science Reference

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SOCIETIES FOR EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY<br />

respondents is very similar to that of all NIH grantees.<br />

The over-representation of university-based researchers<br />

in the survey sample may reflect the fact that this group<br />

was selected only from the population of R01 grantees<br />

rather than recipients of all types of research project<br />

grants.<br />

The median direct cost laboratory budget for the survey<br />

respondents is $300K. By taking the median direct<br />

cost of all competing R01 awards in FY 1999, which<br />

was $171K and multiplying it by 1.43 (the average<br />

number of R01s per laboratory) and dividing it by 77%<br />

(the average percentage of the direct cost budget from<br />

NIH), one can obtain an estimate of the direct cost laboratory<br />

budget for NIH R01-supported investigators.<br />

This amount is $319K, which compares reasonably<br />

with the $300K amount from the survey.<br />

It was also possible to compare the survey respondents<br />

and non-respondents in terms of the length of<br />

time a particular R01 award was retained. Each NIH<br />

grant is assigned a unique identification number, part<br />

of which consists of a “year of support” field. This field<br />

indicates the number of continuous years of support<br />

for that grant. For survey respondents, the distribution<br />

was 54% for R01s held for less than five years, 25% for<br />

R01s held between five and ten years, and 21% for<br />

R01s held for greater than 10 years. For the nonrespondents,<br />

these percentages were 54%, 28% and<br />

18%, respectively. [If an investigator had multiple R01<br />

grants, only the longest-held grant was used in the<br />

analysis.]<br />

7. Specialized equipment refers to instruments found in<br />

limited numbers in a department or entire institution.<br />

Examples are biosensors, cell sorters, mass spectrometers,<br />

NMR instruments, confocal microscopes, biomedical<br />

imagers, DNA sequencers, X-ray diffractometers,<br />

analytical ultracentrifuges, microarray instruments and<br />

bioinfomatics hardware/software.<br />

176 JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR TECHNIQUES, VOLUME 11, ISSUE 4, DECEMBER 2000<br />

8. Routine use equipment is common research equipment<br />

items typically found in most labs and/or departmental<br />

common use rooms. Examples are tissue culture hoods<br />

and incubators, preparative centrifuges, UV spectrophotometers,<br />

scintillation counters and freezers.<br />

9. From the Evaluation of NIH Shared Instrumentation<br />

Grant Program: Reports From Users (NCRR), the average<br />

number of major users per instrument is 5.2. A<br />

major user is defined as a Public Health Service (PHS)supported<br />

investigator who accounts for a significant<br />

fraction of instrument use time. The average number of<br />

minor users per instrument is 9.0. A minor user may be<br />

either PHS-sponsored investigators whose individual<br />

share does not constitute a significant percentage of<br />

average use time, or investigators whose instrument<br />

research is not supported by PHS. Because most of the<br />

instruments costing $100,000 or more will likely be<br />

shared, the committee assumed that the number of<br />

users should be a minimum of five and a maximum of<br />

fourteen (five major users and nine minor users). However,<br />

it is unlikely that all of the minor users would be<br />

R01 recipients. Therefore, the committee estimated ten<br />

users (five major users and five minor users) for instruments<br />

costing $100,000 or more. For instruments costing<br />

less than $100,00, some instruments would be<br />

shared and some would not be, so the committee estimated<br />

that the average number of users is approximately<br />

five.<br />

10. Since funding for high-end equipment (instrumentation<br />

costing more than $100,000) is extremely limited,<br />

FASEB recommends that NIH provide funding for the<br />

total estimated need of the research community: $150<br />

million.<br />

11. For equipment costing less than $100,000 (for which<br />

there are other sources of support) FASEB recommends<br />

that NIH fund two-thirds of the $75 million estimated<br />

need: $50 million.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!