FR AB - Science Reference
FR AB - Science Reference
FR AB - Science Reference
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
R3-M<br />
A current profile of microarray laboratories: results of the<br />
2000–2001 <strong>AB</strong>RF Microarray Research Group Survey of Laboratories<br />
using microarray technologies.<br />
G.S. Grills1, C. Griffin2, A. Massimi1, K. Lilley3, K. Knudtson4, J. VanEe5; 1Albert Einstein Col. of Med., 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx,<br />
NY 10461-1602, 2UCSF, 3Cambridge Univ., 4Univ. of Iowa,<br />
5Cornell Univ.<br />
The goal of this survey study was to build a current picture of the microarray<br />
analysis world. Microarray analysis is a fast developing field. New methods<br />
and instrumentation are being constantly introduced and the number of investigators<br />
using the technology is rapidly expanding. We focused on Affymetrix<br />
GeneChip and on cDNA, oligonucleotide and protein microarray<br />
spotting technologies. Data was requested from laboratories using these<br />
technologies by posting instructions for participation on microarray related<br />
electronic discussion groups. A web based survey form was used to collect<br />
information such as instrumentation, protocols, staffing, funding, and<br />
throughput. The survey was geared toward gathering information from academic,<br />
pharmaceutical, and commercial laboratories that offer microarray<br />
technologies as a shared resource. Individual laboratories that have these<br />
technologies were also invited to participate. This study is part of a continuing<br />
survey. The data from this survey was analyzed to build a current profile<br />
of microarray analysis laboratories.<br />
R5-S<br />
Preliminary results from the DNA Sequencing Research Group 2001<br />
Study: factors that affect the sequencing and detection of mixed<br />
base sequences in PCR products.<br />
M.A. Robertson1, L. Hall2, J. Hawes3, T. Hunter4, E. Jackson-Machelski5, K. Knudtson6, D. Leviten7; 1Univ. of Utah, 4A 438, School of Medicine,<br />
50 N. Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, 2Albert Einstein Col. of<br />
Med., 3Indiana Univ. Sch. of Med., 4Univ. of Vermont, 5Washington Univ.<br />
Sch. of Med., 6Univ. of Iowa, 7ICOS Corp.<br />
With the imminent release of the draft Human Genome Sequence, many laboratories<br />
are seeing increased demand for comparative sequencing. However,<br />
detection of mixed bases in a DNA population is a very demanding technique<br />
for many DNA Sequencing Core Laboratories. The DSRG will report on a<br />
study to test the ability of the <strong>AB</strong>RF DNA sequencing community to sequence<br />
PCR products containing several different kinds of base pair mutations, insertions<br />
and/or deletions. To limit variables, PCR products and sequencing<br />
primers were supplied along with a wild type reference sequence as a text<br />
file. Members were asked to sequence the PCR products using their choice<br />
of chemistry for mutation/mixed base detection. The set of PCR products<br />
contained mutations of varying difficulty. The PCR products were amplified<br />
from primers that contained universal forward and reverse primers to allow<br />
testing of both dye terminator and dye primer sequencing chemistries. Results<br />
were submitted as <strong>AB</strong>I chromatogram files with a short survey to gather relevant<br />
information. Analysis of the study will address:<br />
a) The ability of participants to be able to correctly identify the mutations.<br />
b) The accuracy of dye primer versus dye terminator sequencing for correct<br />
mutation detection.<br />
c) The ability to detect mutations from only one primer sequence.<br />
d) The differences in instrumentation in the abilty to detect mutations, e.g.,<br />
capillary vs slab gel instruments.<br />
e) The software/sequence alignment tools being used for mutation analysis.<br />
RESEARCH GROUP <strong>AB</strong>STRACTS<br />
<strong>AB</strong>RF 2001 <strong>AB</strong>STRACTS<br />
R4-T<br />
NARG 2000–2001 DNA Synthesis Study: Part I. Surveys of trends<br />
and strategies of DNA synthesis core facilities. Part II. Evaluation of<br />
oligonucleotide synthesis in core facilities utilizing homopolymers<br />
of A(20), G(20), C(20), T(20) and one heteropolymer.<br />
M.E. Gunthorpe1, J.F. Fox2, B.P. Holloway3, K.S. Lilley4, M. Lively5, K. Mills6, S.A. Scaringe7, T. Thannhauser8, A. Yeung9; 1Howard Hughes<br />
Med. Inst., UCSF, 533 Parnassus Ave. at 3rd Ave. Rm U436, San Francisco,<br />
CA 94143-0793, 2Univ. of Virginia, 3Ctrs. for Dis. Control and Prevent.,<br />
4Univ. of Cambridge, 5Wake Forest Univ. Sch. of Med., 6Millennium<br />
Pharmaceut. Inc., 7Dharmacon Res. Inc., 3200 Valmont Road #5,<br />
Boulder, CO 80301, 8Cornell Univ., 9Fox Chase Cancer Ctr.<br />
The Nucleic Acids Research Group (NARG) of the Association of Biomolecular<br />
Resource Facilities (<strong>AB</strong>RF) invited subscribers to the <strong>AB</strong>RF electronic discussion<br />
group to participate in our 2000–2001 study, which was accessed<br />
online at the web address listed below. Part I was a general survey regarding<br />
various aspects and issues pertaining to DNA synthesis core facilities,<br />
such as quality control, work philosophy and the future. Part II was an evaluation<br />
of oligonucleotide synthesis from core facilities by using a novel<br />
approach: Isolation of synthesis problems by analysis of homopolymer<br />
oligonucleotides. In this approach, the synthesis problems are magnified<br />
19�–20� depending on the chemical properties of the individual bases.<br />
Oligonulceotides submitted by participating labs will be analyzed by a range<br />
of analytical methods including HPLC, capillary electrophoresis, MALDI-TOF<br />
and ESI mass spectrometry to assess the quality of each product. The results<br />
of the evaluation of oligonucleotides from participants utilizing different<br />
instrumentation and protocols will be presented.<br />
Web address: http://www.abrf.org/ and choose “Nucleic Acids Research<br />
Group (NARG) 2000–2001 Study” under the category “Open Research Group<br />
Studies”.<br />
R6-S<br />
Dissecting structure-function relationships in RNA/protein<br />
interaction.<br />
I.A. Laird-Offringa1, D.G. Myszka2, P.S. Katsamba1; 1Univ. of Southern<br />
California, Norris Cancer Center, Room NOR 6420/1441 Eastlake Ave.,<br />
Los Angeles, CA 90089-9176, 2Univ. of Utah, 50 N. Medical Dr./School of<br />
Medicine Rm 4A417, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132<br />
RNA-binding proteins play critical roles in gene expression and regulation at<br />
the post-transcriptional level. While much is known about the various naturally<br />
occurring RNA-binding motifs, and co-crystal structures of a number of<br />
RNA/protein complexes are available, very little is known about the dynamics<br />
of RNA/protein interactions. We have used the spliceosomal protein U1A<br />
and its RNA target in the U1 small nuclear RNA (U1hairpinII or U1hpII) as a<br />
model to study the kinetics of RNA/protein interaction. Using the previously<br />
solved structure of the U1A/U1hpII complex, we have engineered a series of<br />
mutants designed to probe the roles of electrostatics, hydrogen bonding, aromatic<br />
stacking, and RNA loop length, all of which have been implicated in<br />
formation of the U1A/U1hpII complex. The effects of these mutations on the<br />
binding dynamics were studied using BIACORE, which yielded high quality<br />
kinetic data about the interaction. We determined that neutralization of positive<br />
charges on the protein slows the association rate and reduces the deleterious<br />
effect of salt on complex formation. In contrast, removal of hydrogenbonding<br />
or stacking interactions within the RNA/protein interface, or<br />
reducing the size of the RNA loop, increases the dissociation rate. Our data<br />
support a mechanism of binding consisting of a rapid initial association<br />
based on electrostatic interactions and a subsequent locking step based on<br />
the hydrogen bonding and stacking interactions that occur during the<br />
induced fit of RNA and protein. Our results demonstrate the power of kinetics<br />
to dissect the functional differences between structural features of two<br />
interacting macromolecules.<br />
JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR TECHNIQUES, VOLUME 11, ISSUE 4, DECEMBER 2000 225