10.08.2020 Views

REGO-FIX Main Catalogue ENGLISH

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Comparison<br />

The comparison between the overall system and a single toolholder<br />

demonstrates that the balance of the individual component has a very small<br />

effect on the overall system.<br />

Overall system<br />

Machine spindle<br />

for HSK-A 63<br />

15,000 g<br />

Toolholder<br />

HSK-A 63<br />

ER32X080-H<br />

1035 g<br />

Collet<br />

ER 32-UP<br />

6.00 – 5.00<br />

150 g<br />

Seal disk<br />

DS / ER 32<br />

6.00 – 5.50<br />

15 g<br />

Clamping nut<br />

Hi-Q ERC 32<br />

15 g<br />

Cutter with<br />

internal cooling<br />

ø 6 mm<br />

30 g<br />

Weight<br />

16398 g<br />

Radius (R)<br />

31.5 mm<br />

Speed 10,000 min -1 42,000 min -1<br />

Balance quality (G) 2.5 2.5<br />

Permitted residual unbalance (U zul ) 39.146 gmm 9.321 gmm<br />

Permitted eccentricity (e zul ) 2.387 μm 0.568 μm<br />

U zul10 000 =<br />

e zul10 000 =<br />

u 10 000 =<br />

2.5 x 16,398 x 9.549<br />

2.5 x 16,398 x 9.549<br />

= 39.146 gmm U zul42 000 =<br />

10,000 42,000<br />

39.146<br />

9.321<br />

= 2.387 µm e zul42 000 =<br />

16,398 16,398<br />

39.146<br />

9.321<br />

= 1.2 g u 42 000 =<br />

31.5 31.5<br />

= 9.321 gmm<br />

= 0.568 µm<br />

= 0.3 g<br />

By calculation the entire system is allowed 1.2 g at 10,000 min -1 and 0.3 g at 42,000 min -1 and the permissible unbalanced<br />

mass is at its greatest diameter (in this case the spindle rotor). The following calculation is used to demonstrate how little<br />

unbalanced mass of a toolholder HSK-A 63 / ER32 x 080 is acceptable in comparison to the overall system:<br />

Weight<br />

Radius (R)<br />

1035 g<br />

31.5 mm<br />

Speed 10,000 min -1 42,000 min -1<br />

Balance quality (G) 2.5 2.5<br />

Permitted residual unbalance (U zul ) 2.471 gmm 0.588 gmm<br />

Permitted eccentricity (e zul ) 2.387 μm 0.568 μm<br />

U zul10 000<br />

=<br />

e zul10 000<br />

=<br />

u 10 000<br />

=<br />

2.5 x 1035 x 9.549<br />

2.5 x 1035 x 9.549<br />

= 2.471 gmm U zul42 000<br />

=<br />

10,000 42,000<br />

2.471<br />

0.588<br />

= 2.380 µm e zul42 000<br />

=<br />

1035 1035<br />

2.471<br />

0.588<br />

= 0.078 g u 42 000<br />

=<br />

31.5 31.5<br />

= 0.588 gmm<br />

= 0.568 μm<br />

= 0.019 g<br />

If now the allowable imbalance masses are compared, it is evident that in the overall system may be about 15 times larger<br />

than in the toolholder alone. The current state of balancing technology is not economically producible when just looking at the<br />

toolholder, but when the entire system is considered it may not necessary. An imbalance caused by positioning error can’t be<br />

corrected or accounted for.<br />

312 Technical information

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!