22.12.2012 Views

THE BEGINNING OF MUSLIM HISTORICAL RESEARCH*

THE BEGINNING OF MUSLIM HISTORICAL RESEARCH*

THE BEGINNING OF MUSLIM HISTORICAL RESEARCH*

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ishica, V, 4 (1968), 197-211; Mohammad Arkiin, "Introduction A<br />

La Pensee Islamique Classique", in Cahiers D' Histoire Mondial, XI,<br />

4, 585; Alfred Guillaume, "Apostolic Tradition" in IslZm (Penguin, 1966)<br />

88-1 10, discusses the relationship between Yudith and Fiqh, (full of hostile<br />

criticism); I. Goldziher, Mohammadar~ische Studien, 11; Eng. tr. Mwlim<br />

Studies, 11, 420 (earliest critical study of uadfth by a European); at-Thii<br />

nawf, Karhshdf Istil&it al-Fun&, I, 279-28 1. A. Guillaume, The Tradi-<br />

tions ofIslam, pp. 184; Th. W. Juynbul, @adis, Isl. Ans. V, 47-54; Maam-<br />

mad Hamfdulliih, "Early History of the Compilation of Badith" in Islamic<br />

Literature, (1966), XII/3, 5-9 (discusses the value and importance of the<br />

$&Tfa Hmmiim ibn Munabbih, compiled in the early thirties of thesecond<br />

century of the Hijra). Two recent studies by two Arab Muslim scholars<br />

may be mentioned here; Subhias-$abih, 'Uliim al-Hadith Wa mq{&dtuhd<br />

(1965), pp. 447 and 'Abdul Rdque Nawfal, al-Isliim wa 'Ilm al-fladith,<br />

(1965) pp. 244. Naji Ma'riif has studied the influence of the @adith on<br />

the origin of history writing among the Muslims; see al-Aqkim, 11, 9<br />

(Baghdad, 1966), 116-149; al-Khatib al-Baghdidi, al-KijZya or La Trans-<br />

mission ecrite du fladith, critical edition by Yiisuf aLbIshsh, pp. 199. A<br />

good number of Abiidith have been interpreted and commented upon by Ibn<br />

Furak in his Kit& Mushkil al-Hadith (1362. A.H.), pp. 214. Collections<br />

of Hadith over and above the SiMb Sitta (Six Authentic Collections) and<br />

books concerning the sciences of Hadfth are legion but one of the important<br />

works in the latter category may be mentioned here i.e. 'Uliim al-@adith<br />

or the Muqaddima of Ibn a$-$al&h on which some commentaries were<br />

written. A. al-Magri, "An Introduction to the Study of the Traditional<br />

Criteria used in the Criticism of uadfth", Ph. D. Thesis, Cambridge 1958-<br />

59; M. Yiisufuddin, "Pre-Bukhiri Hadith Literature" in the Proceedings<br />

(1970), 357-361; 'Abdug $amad $grim al-Azhari, Tdlrira'i Risdlat in the<br />

Tarjwniin al-fladith, UrdD (Lahore, Jan. 1970), I, 17-19. It contradicts<br />

the statement that Hadith was recorded in writing two centuries after the<br />

death of the prophet and mentions some compilations made in the first<br />

century like the Muwa{{a', of Im3m Mak, $abl$a of 'Ali and $&$a Abiidith<br />

of Anas ibn Mdik. See also the articles of Yiifiz Muhammad GondiM<br />

in the Tajumiin al-Yadith, published in the different issues of 1970. J.<br />

Robson, fladith, Encyclopedia of Islam, newed. 111, 23-28 (contains good<br />

bibliography); Mubarnmad Mugtafa A'qami, Studies in Early ~ d t h<br />

Literature with a criticaledition of some early texts (1 968). Ahmad ash-<br />

Sharbasi, A& al-Abiidith al-Qudriyah, which contains selections from<br />

the major works of tradition published by the Govt. of the UAR, I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!