22.12.2012 Views

Insurance Contract Law Issues Paper 2 Warranties - Law Commission

Insurance Contract Law Issues Paper 2 Warranties - Law Commission

Insurance Contract Law Issues Paper 2 Warranties - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.6 Here we begin by outlining the effect of sections 3 and 17 of UCTA on other<br />

types of commercial contract. We then consider the arguments for and against<br />

extending this protection to commercial insurance.<br />

THE UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS ACT 1977, SECTIONS 3 & 17<br />

8.7 In England and Wales, section 3 subjects certain clauses to a requirement of<br />

reasonableness. It applies between contracting parties where one of them deals<br />

as a consumer or on the other’s written standard terms of business. Section<br />

3(2)(b) prevents the party who wrote the standard terms of business from<br />

claiming to be entitled<br />

(i) to render a contractual performance substantially different from<br />

that which was reasonably expected of him, or<br />

(ii) in respect of the whole or any part of his contractual obligation, to<br />

render no contractual performance at all,<br />

except in so far as… the contract term satisfies the requirement of<br />

reasonableness.<br />

8.8 In Scotland, the issue is dealt with by section 17, which enacts the same<br />

substantive provision, using slightly different words. It provides that a term in a<br />

consumer contract or standard form contract “shall have no effect for the purpose<br />

of enabling a party to a contract…<br />

(b) in respect of a contractual obligation, to render no performance, or<br />

to render a performance which is substantially different from that<br />

which the consumer or customer reasonably expected from the<br />

contract<br />

if it was not fair and reasonable to incorporate the term in the<br />

contract.<br />

8.9 In February 2005, the two <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>s produced a joint report and draft Bill<br />

to amend the law of unfair contract terms. As far as sections 3 and 17 are<br />

concerned, we did not intend to make any substantive changes in the law.<br />

However, we aimed to produce a single section to apply to the whole of Great<br />

Britain, written in clearer language. Clause 9(3) of the draft Bill applies where one<br />

party to a business contract (“A”) deals on the written standard terms of business<br />

of the other (“B”). It states that<br />

Unless the term is fair and reasonable, B cannot rely on any of those<br />

terms to claim it has the right –<br />

(a) to carry out its obligations under the contract in a way substantially<br />

different from the way in which A reasonably expected them to be<br />

carried out, or<br />

(b) not to carry out all or part of those obligations.<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!