22.12.2012 Views

Insurance Contract Law Issues Paper 2 Warranties - Law Commission

Insurance Contract Law Issues Paper 2 Warranties - Law Commission

Insurance Contract Law Issues Paper 2 Warranties - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It is a striking feature of this branch of the law that other legal systems<br />

are increasingly discarding the more extreme features of English law<br />

which allow an insurer to avoid liability on grounds which do not relate<br />

to the occurrence of the loss. 24<br />

6.50 In Canada, the Marine <strong>Insurance</strong> Act 1993 is based on the UK Marine <strong>Insurance</strong><br />

Act 1906. However courts have limited it “to situations where the warranty is<br />

material to the risk and the breach has a bearing on the loss.” 25 Where cases do<br />

not meet this criterion, the courts tend to find that the clause is not a true<br />

warranty at all.<br />

The Bamcell II<br />

6.51 The leading case is the Supreme Court decision in Century <strong>Insurance</strong> Company<br />

of Canada v Case Existological Laboratories Ltd. (“The Bamcell II”). 26 The<br />

Bamcell II was a converted barge used for oceanographic experiments. The<br />

owners had negotiated a policy, which included the following term<br />

Warranted that a watchman is stationed on board the BAMCELL II<br />

each night from 2200 hours to 0600 hours with instructions for<br />

shutting down all equipment in an emergency.<br />

6.52 In fact, the owners never placed a watchman on board. However, there were no<br />

problems at night. The loss occurred mid afternoon, and therefore the breach had<br />

“absolutely no bearing whatever on the loss” 27 . As a result, Ritchie J held:<br />

The clause would only have been effective if the loss had occurred<br />

between 2200 hours and 0600 hours, and it was proved that there<br />

was no watchman stationed aboard during those hours. To this extent<br />

the condition contained in the clause constituted a limitation of the<br />

risk insured against but it was not a warranty. 28<br />

24 Manifest Shipping Co Ltd v Uni-Polaris Shipping Co Ltd and others (The Star Sea) [2001]1<br />

All ER 743, at para 79. Lord Hobhouse specifically mentions “the most outspoken criticism<br />

of the English law of non-disclosure” found in the South African case of the Mutual and<br />

Federal <strong>Insurance</strong> [1995] (I) SA 419.<br />

25 Christopher Giaschi. “<strong>Warranties</strong> in Marine <strong>Insurance</strong>” <strong>Paper</strong>, Association of Marine<br />

Underwriters of British Columbia, Vancouver, 10 April 1997.<br />

http://www.admiraltylaw.com/papers/warranties.htm (24 May 2006)<br />

26<br />

[1984] 1 WWR 97.<br />

27 Century <strong>Insurance</strong> Company of Canada v Case Existological Laboratories Ltd. (The<br />

“BAMCELL II”) [1984] 1 WWR 97, 104, per Ritchie J.<br />

28 Century <strong>Insurance</strong> Company of Canada v Case Existological Laboratories Ltd. (The<br />

“BAMCELL II”) [1984] 1 WWR 97, 104, per Ritchie J.<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!