When This Blows Over

The authors miss the fundamental issue underlying the
enviro-rads hysteria about the apocalypse we face because of
global warming. This has nothing to do with science. Rational
debate is off the table because the deniers (read: Holocaust
deniers) are right wing nut jobs. The enviro-rads' and their largely
left-wing Dem sycophants' objective is not saving the life as we
know from imminent destruction. It is instead government control of
the energy industry, energy intensive manufacturing and ultimately
of the entire economy. In a word, the alarmists' objective is
totalitarianism.
see more
Phineas W → dao1 • 6 days ago
The [opposing] argument makes the common error of making
the case on pragmatism rather than going to the very
fundamental of the issue, the moral issue. Lord knows the
enviro-crazies go straight to the moral argument.
We as advocates of liberty and freer markets must do the
same, make our case on the moral level first. Then go to the
pragmatic arguments.
Phineas W • 9 days ago
There is no science that can justify total regulatory control of the
economy, what we used to call fascism.
Climate scientists and climate activists seem to
have all but forgotten that the science of human
nature fundamentally requires liberty.
Or have they?