05.10.2020 Views

When This Blows Over

The Founding Fathers share an unsafe space with a large crowd of passionate and hysterical keyboard warriors. * "Skate Around" & "Zoom" > click page, look down ** "Full Screen" & "Page Overview" > click page, look up

The Founding Fathers share an unsafe space with a large crowd of passionate and hysterical keyboard warriors.

* "Skate Around" & "Zoom" > click page, look down
** "Full Screen" & "Page Overview" > click page, look up

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Henry Smith3 years ago

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the

consent of the Owner. Solider=fetus / House=uterus. Better than the

slavery analogy.

Anthony 3 years ago

Everybody wants fewer abortions; I think we can all agree on this.

So, more contraceptives, Sex Ed, and proper education about how

to have good relationships would help. The irony is that the

religious pro-lifers are often against these measures... Also,

clapping and cheering on politicians who proclaim pro-choice at

rallies is a bad idea... you know the other side thinks you're

cheering on baby killing...not a good image...

Avdcmp 3 years ago

On the later point. Bill says it comes down to one question: "is it a person

...or not"? This is out of context. They are both entities. Both human

entities. But what of actual development and potential development? How

much of a person is a human cell at the point it has split into two? Not

much of a "person", but definitely a potential person. Why afford the same

rights to a two-cell entity that are given to a multicell, conscious being who

is able to sustain its own independent life? At the end, Bill makes the

comparison to slaves. A slave is an actual person, whereas a fetus is a

potential person. This is a not comparing apples with apples.

Tentacle 3 years ago

I consider the unborn baby a person. I also consider that person to

be an aggressive person in active attack against the mother. That

unborn person is sucking nutrients from the mother, causing the

mother pain and discomfort. Risking the mother's life during the

birth process. So yes that unborn child is a person, but the mother

has the right to self defense against that person.

Charles 3 years ago

In the same sense, the mother is potentially trying to abort the baby. So, by

your logic, the baby has the right to defend itself against the mother. And it was

the mother who caused the baby to start becoming a person in the first place.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!