23.12.2012 Views

Eric Vittoz - IEEE

Eric Vittoz - IEEE

Eric Vittoz - IEEE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TECHNICAL LITERATURE<br />

of multi-gate MOS devices and more particularly on<br />

double-gate devices [58], [59].<br />

II. THE EKV DESIGN METHODOLOGY<br />

One of the main features of the EKV model compared<br />

to others is the small number of parameters that it<br />

requires. This obviously simplifies the model and its<br />

implementation, but also the parameter extraction.<br />

Another feature, more important to my eyes, is its<br />

hierarchical structure: indeed the complete compact<br />

model can easily be reduced to the simple hand calculation<br />

model by setting some parameters to specific<br />

values. This allows for a step-by-step approach in<br />

the design of new circuits, starting with the simplest<br />

model coherent with the model used for hand calculation<br />

and progressively adding effects in order to<br />

evaluate their impact on the circuit performance.<br />

Actually, the EKV MOS transistor model was initially<br />

not developed with the aim of having a compact<br />

model for circuit simulation, but rather for having a<br />

simple hand calculation model that can help designing<br />

and sizing circuits that are biased in all modes of<br />

operation including strong and weak inversion but<br />

also the region in between called the moderate inversion.<br />

The available models at that time were simplistic<br />

square-law models that were often inaccurate in<br />

strong inversion and totally wrong in moderate and<br />

weak inversion. The EKV MOS transistor model introduced<br />

the powerful concept of inversion factor (also<br />

called inversion coefficient IC) as the main transistor<br />

design parameter that is more general and replaces<br />

the long-time used overdrive voltage, distinctive of<br />

strong inversion models, but meaningless in weak<br />

inversion. For more than 25 years, E. <strong>Vittoz</strong> and I have<br />

been teaching analog circuit design based on the use<br />

of this concept of inversion factor. This approach<br />

allows for expressing all the important parameters of<br />

a single transistor biased in saturation, such as smallsignal<br />

parameters, including transconductances and<br />

capacitances, noise parameters, versus a single<br />

parameter: the inversion factor. Sweeping the inversion<br />

factor allows exploring all the design space for a<br />

single transistor. In 1996, I created a first sizing tool<br />

actually called Analog Designer and running on a<br />

Mac. The GUI is shown in the Fig. 1, below. It<br />

allowed calculating all the important design parameters<br />

from the inversion factor, corresponding to the<br />

top axes in the figure. Then all the other parameters<br />

were updated simultaneously when sweeping the first<br />

vertical bar. The designer, hence, could then optimize<br />

the operating point most appropriate for the particular<br />

task of the single transistor to be sized.<br />

EKV design methodology was extended by D. M.<br />

Binkley beyond what was initially created, looking at<br />

all the different design cases that may be faced. For<br />

example, he extended the definition of the inversion<br />

Fig. 1. The Analog Designer tool illustrating the basics of<br />

the design methodology based on the inversion coefficient<br />

[61].<br />

factor to include important effects such as velocity saturation<br />

and mobility reduction due to the vertical<br />

field, allowing for a more accurate design for shortchannel<br />

devices at high inversion factors. Drain<br />

induced barrier lowering (DIBL) is also included in<br />

the calculation of the voltage gain, since it often dominates<br />

the channel length modulation (CLM) effect at<br />

short transistor length and low inversion factors. D. M.<br />

Binkley recently published a book on his work making<br />

it the first true reference on the original EKV<br />

design methodology and the many extensions he<br />

developed [60].<br />

III. LOW-POWER CIRCUIT DESIGN<br />

The EKV MOS transistor model and the related design<br />

methodology has been taught for many years and has<br />

been used by many designers for the design of lowpower<br />

circuits. Many circuits that were developped by<br />

E. <strong>Vittoz</strong>, F. Krummenacher, our Ph.D. students and<br />

myself, have in one way or another used and<br />

improved the methodology.<br />

I started to use the EKV design methodology immediately<br />

after my Ph.D., when, together with F. Krummenacher<br />

(the “K” of EKV) we founded Smart Silicon<br />

Systems in 1989. We were working together with Erik<br />

Heijne and other teams at CERN developing several<br />

CMOS strip and pixel detector front-end read-out<br />

chips 3 [62]-[65]. After I joined the Electronics Labs at<br />

EPFL in 1992, apart from the modeling work mentioned<br />

above, my other Ph.D. students were working<br />

on low-power and low-voltage CMOS design and<br />

were intensively using the EKV design methodology.<br />

With the purpose of having ever decreasing supply<br />

voltages, the concept of log-domain circuits was first<br />

investigated. The log-domain approach uses instantaneous<br />

companding where the currents, having basically<br />

an unlimited dynamic range (DR), are com-<br />

3 For more details on the history of CMOS read-out chip design for particle<br />

physics experiment, please read the article by E. Heijne in this issue.<br />

26 <strong>IEEE</strong> SSCS NEWS Summer 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!