24.12.2012 Views

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THURSDAY<br />

268<br />

threshold values for surface rendering techniques have been<br />

described by Summers as –500. While these thresholds are effective<br />

in the main and lobar bronchi, artifacts can occur in the<br />

smaller airways, and may also result in a overestimation <strong>of</strong><br />

stenoses. Faster reconstruction times have made volume rendered<br />

techniques more accessible are are used increasingy at our<br />

institution.<br />

As we have seen with more recent literature in virtual<br />

colonscopy, an original fascination with the technology has given<br />

way to a more realistic assessment <strong>of</strong> VBs particular capabilities<br />

and weaknesses. One <strong>of</strong> the greatest strengths <strong>of</strong> virtual bronchoscopy<br />

is the added benefits inherent in CT imaging. Unlike<br />

fiberoptic bronchoscopy, the data used in the generation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

virtual bronchoscope is not limited to the lumen: CT bronchosocpy<br />

has the ability to accurate depict extraluminal anatomy<br />

not available to the bronchoscopist Integration <strong>of</strong> this intraluminal<br />

and extraluminal data will be discussed later. Many <strong>of</strong> the<br />

imaging limitations <strong>of</strong> virtual bronchoscopy have been well<br />

defined by Summers, but <strong>of</strong>ten describe the markedly limited<br />

ability <strong>of</strong> the virtual bronchoscope to depict mucosal abnormalities.<br />

The unavoidable integration <strong>of</strong> cardiac and respiratory<br />

motion into the virtual bronchoscope introduces subtle error into<br />

the depiction <strong>of</strong> VB data and therefore limits the ability to evaluate<br />

the mucosal and submucosal pathology.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> papers have been written comparing the diagnostic<br />

value <strong>of</strong> virtual bronchoscopy with standard CT images as<br />

well as fiberoptic bronchoscopy. One <strong>of</strong> the values <strong>of</strong> virtual<br />

endoscopy in the airways is the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the upper airways.<br />

In a paper by Burke, Vinings and others using FreeFlight s<strong>of</strong>tware,,<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> airway obstruction was evaluated using virtual<br />

bronchosocpy. This study included 30 patients with upper<br />

airway disease ranging from airway stenosis, laryngtracheomalacia,<br />

tumors and webs. There was excellent agreement<br />

betweenVB and FOB is the evaluation <strong>of</strong> airway stenoses. The<br />

differences in ratios <strong>of</strong> stenoses/lumen was within 10% for VB<br />

vs upper airway endoscopy. The evaluation <strong>of</strong> dynamic airway<br />

collapse was much less reliable with virtual endoscopy, but there<br />

was clearly established a role for virtual endoscopy in airway<br />

stenoses.<br />

Several papers have been written defining the role <strong>of</strong> virtual<br />

bronchoscopy in patients with airway stenoses secondary to bronchogenic<br />

carcinoma. In the paper by Liewald et al, 30 patients<br />

with bronchogenic carcinoma were studied. While central<br />

lesions were well identified by virtual bronchosocpy, stenosis<br />

secondary to smaller lobar lesions were not accurately identified.<br />

In a paper by Rapp Bernhardt , a number <strong>of</strong> visualization thecniques<br />

were compared, includeing axial, MPR, MinIp and virtual<br />

bronchoscopy Virtual bronchosocopy evaluation <strong>of</strong> stenoses<br />

showed the lowest interobserver variability. There was no significant<br />

difference between virtual and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in<br />

the estimation <strong>of</strong> stenoses, though there tended to be some overestimation<br />

<strong>of</strong> stensos, felt to be due to thresholding limitations<strong>of</strong><br />

stenoses in virtual bronchoscopy Mucosal abnormalies were not<br />

well evaluated with virtual bronchscopy. Other work has looked<br />

at the success <strong>of</strong> bronchial stenoses in a lung transplant population.<br />

In this paper, stenoses at the anastomosis was evaluated by<br />

axial and virtual bronchosocpy. Stenoses at the anastomotic sites<br />

were better visualized by virtual bronchoscopy than axial CT,<br />

though this was not statistically significant. Surface irregularties<br />

due to infection were equally visualized with virtal and fibeeroptic<br />

bronchoscopy.<br />

There is an increasing literature on the use <strong>of</strong> virtual<br />

bronchscopy in improving the diagnostic accuracy <strong>of</strong> fiberoptic<br />

bronchoscopy. In a paper by McAdams, the virtual bronchoscopy<br />

was reviewed by the pulmonologist for evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

lymph node node biopsy, and was preferred to the axial CT slices.<br />

There was a slight improvement in diagnostic yield compared to<br />

standard axial images when VB images were reviewed. In a<br />

paper by Hopper, a technique <strong>of</strong> lymph node highlight was<br />

described. Mediastinal lymph nodes were manually segmented<br />

and highlighted and iintegrated into the surface rendered virtual<br />

bronchocopy. By the use <strong>of</strong> varying the transparency <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bronchial wall, the involved lymph node could be chosen before<br />

the procedure. While there was no significant difference in the<br />

diagnostic sampling <strong>of</strong> subcarinal lymph nodes, these techniques<br />

improved diagnostic yield significantly for hilar and pretracheal<br />

lymph nodes.<br />

We have used virtual endoscopy in the chest to also evaluate<br />

the esophagus and aorta. Virtual endoscopy has been used extensively<br />

by our thoracic surgeons to preoperatively assess the aorta.<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> atherosclerotic disease, endoscopic evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

dissections, aneurysms and stenoses have helped the presurgical<br />

planing <strong>of</strong> pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. It has been used<br />

in the coronary arteries, and pulmonary arteries for evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

stenoses and embolic disease. As our techniques improve, virtual<br />

endoscopic techniques will only improve, as will their clinical<br />

applications.<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

Haponik E, Acquino S, Vining D, Virtual Bronchoscopy Clinics in<br />

Chest Medicine 20;201-217 1999<br />

Burke A, Vining DJ, McGuirt W, et al Evaluation <strong>of</strong> airway<br />

Obstruction Using Virtual Bronchoscopy. Laryngosocope;110<br />

23-29 2000<br />

McAdams N, Palmer s, Erasmus JJ et al. Bronchial Anastomotic<br />

Complications in Lung Transplant Recipients:Virtual<br />

Bronchoscopy for Noninvasive Assessment <strong>Radiology</strong><br />

1998;209:689-695<br />

Hopper K, Lucas TAS, Gleeson K, et al. Transbronchial Biopsy<br />

with Virtual CT Bronchoscopy and Nodal Highlighting.<br />

<strong>Radiology</strong> 2001;221:531-536.<br />

Seeman M, Claussen C, Hybrid 3D Visualiztion <strong>of</strong> the chest and<br />

virtual endoscopy <strong>of</strong> the tracheobronchial system:possibilities<br />

and limitations <strong>of</strong> clinical application. Lung Cancer 32<br />

(2001)237-246<br />

.Rapp-Bernhardt U. Welte T, Doerhing W, et al Diagnostic potential<br />

<strong>of</strong> virtual bronchoscopy:advantages in comparision with<br />

axil CT slices, MPR and mIP. Eur. Radiol.10,981-988 (2000).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!