Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology
Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology
Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THURSDAY<br />
268<br />
threshold values for surface rendering techniques have been<br />
described by Summers as –500. While these thresholds are effective<br />
in the main and lobar bronchi, artifacts can occur in the<br />
smaller airways, and may also result in a overestimation <strong>of</strong><br />
stenoses. Faster reconstruction times have made volume rendered<br />
techniques more accessible are are used increasingy at our<br />
institution.<br />
As we have seen with more recent literature in virtual<br />
colonscopy, an original fascination with the technology has given<br />
way to a more realistic assessment <strong>of</strong> VBs particular capabilities<br />
and weaknesses. One <strong>of</strong> the greatest strengths <strong>of</strong> virtual bronchoscopy<br />
is the added benefits inherent in CT imaging. Unlike<br />
fiberoptic bronchoscopy, the data used in the generation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
virtual bronchoscope is not limited to the lumen: CT bronchosocpy<br />
has the ability to accurate depict extraluminal anatomy<br />
not available to the bronchoscopist Integration <strong>of</strong> this intraluminal<br />
and extraluminal data will be discussed later. Many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
imaging limitations <strong>of</strong> virtual bronchoscopy have been well<br />
defined by Summers, but <strong>of</strong>ten describe the markedly limited<br />
ability <strong>of</strong> the virtual bronchoscope to depict mucosal abnormalities.<br />
The unavoidable integration <strong>of</strong> cardiac and respiratory<br />
motion into the virtual bronchoscope introduces subtle error into<br />
the depiction <strong>of</strong> VB data and therefore limits the ability to evaluate<br />
the mucosal and submucosal pathology.<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> papers have been written comparing the diagnostic<br />
value <strong>of</strong> virtual bronchoscopy with standard CT images as<br />
well as fiberoptic bronchoscopy. One <strong>of</strong> the values <strong>of</strong> virtual<br />
endoscopy in the airways is the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the upper airways.<br />
In a paper by Burke, Vinings and others using FreeFlight s<strong>of</strong>tware,,<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> airway obstruction was evaluated using virtual<br />
bronchosocpy. This study included 30 patients with upper<br />
airway disease ranging from airway stenosis, laryngtracheomalacia,<br />
tumors and webs. There was excellent agreement<br />
betweenVB and FOB is the evaluation <strong>of</strong> airway stenoses. The<br />
differences in ratios <strong>of</strong> stenoses/lumen was within 10% for VB<br />
vs upper airway endoscopy. The evaluation <strong>of</strong> dynamic airway<br />
collapse was much less reliable with virtual endoscopy, but there<br />
was clearly established a role for virtual endoscopy in airway<br />
stenoses.<br />
Several papers have been written defining the role <strong>of</strong> virtual<br />
bronchoscopy in patients with airway stenoses secondary to bronchogenic<br />
carcinoma. In the paper by Liewald et al, 30 patients<br />
with bronchogenic carcinoma were studied. While central<br />
lesions were well identified by virtual bronchosocpy, stenosis<br />
secondary to smaller lobar lesions were not accurately identified.<br />
In a paper by Rapp Bernhardt , a number <strong>of</strong> visualization thecniques<br />
were compared, includeing axial, MPR, MinIp and virtual<br />
bronchoscopy Virtual bronchosocopy evaluation <strong>of</strong> stenoses<br />
showed the lowest interobserver variability. There was no significant<br />
difference between virtual and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in<br />
the estimation <strong>of</strong> stenoses, though there tended to be some overestimation<br />
<strong>of</strong> stensos, felt to be due to thresholding limitations<strong>of</strong><br />
stenoses in virtual bronchoscopy Mucosal abnormalies were not<br />
well evaluated with virtual bronchscopy. Other work has looked<br />
at the success <strong>of</strong> bronchial stenoses in a lung transplant population.<br />
In this paper, stenoses at the anastomosis was evaluated by<br />
axial and virtual bronchosocpy. Stenoses at the anastomotic sites<br />
were better visualized by virtual bronchoscopy than axial CT,<br />
though this was not statistically significant. Surface irregularties<br />
due to infection were equally visualized with virtal and fibeeroptic<br />
bronchoscopy.<br />
There is an increasing literature on the use <strong>of</strong> virtual<br />
bronchscopy in improving the diagnostic accuracy <strong>of</strong> fiberoptic<br />
bronchoscopy. In a paper by McAdams, the virtual bronchoscopy<br />
was reviewed by the pulmonologist for evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
lymph node node biopsy, and was preferred to the axial CT slices.<br />
There was a slight improvement in diagnostic yield compared to<br />
standard axial images when VB images were reviewed. In a<br />
paper by Hopper, a technique <strong>of</strong> lymph node highlight was<br />
described. Mediastinal lymph nodes were manually segmented<br />
and highlighted and iintegrated into the surface rendered virtual<br />
bronchocopy. By the use <strong>of</strong> varying the transparency <strong>of</strong> the<br />
bronchial wall, the involved lymph node could be chosen before<br />
the procedure. While there was no significant difference in the<br />
diagnostic sampling <strong>of</strong> subcarinal lymph nodes, these techniques<br />
improved diagnostic yield significantly for hilar and pretracheal<br />
lymph nodes.<br />
We have used virtual endoscopy in the chest to also evaluate<br />
the esophagus and aorta. Virtual endoscopy has been used extensively<br />
by our thoracic surgeons to preoperatively assess the aorta.<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> atherosclerotic disease, endoscopic evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
dissections, aneurysms and stenoses have helped the presurgical<br />
planing <strong>of</strong> pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. It has been used<br />
in the coronary arteries, and pulmonary arteries for evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
stenoses and embolic disease. As our techniques improve, virtual<br />
endoscopic techniques will only improve, as will their clinical<br />
applications.<br />
REFERENCES:<br />
Haponik E, Acquino S, Vining D, Virtual Bronchoscopy Clinics in<br />
Chest Medicine 20;201-217 1999<br />
Burke A, Vining DJ, McGuirt W, et al Evaluation <strong>of</strong> airway<br />
Obstruction Using Virtual Bronchoscopy. Laryngosocope;110<br />
23-29 2000<br />
McAdams N, Palmer s, Erasmus JJ et al. Bronchial Anastomotic<br />
Complications in Lung Transplant Recipients:Virtual<br />
Bronchoscopy for Noninvasive Assessment <strong>Radiology</strong><br />
1998;209:689-695<br />
Hopper K, Lucas TAS, Gleeson K, et al. Transbronchial Biopsy<br />
with Virtual CT Bronchoscopy and Nodal Highlighting.<br />
<strong>Radiology</strong> 2001;221:531-536.<br />
Seeman M, Claussen C, Hybrid 3D Visualiztion <strong>of</strong> the chest and<br />
virtual endoscopy <strong>of</strong> the tracheobronchial system:possibilities<br />
and limitations <strong>of</strong> clinical application. Lung Cancer 32<br />
(2001)237-246<br />
.Rapp-Bernhardt U. Welte T, Doerhing W, et al Diagnostic potential<br />
<strong>of</strong> virtual bronchoscopy:advantages in comparision with<br />
axil CT slices, MPR and mIP. Eur. Radiol.10,981-988 (2000).