24.12.2012 Views

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. The volume <strong>of</strong> contrast medium required is equivalent to<br />

the injection rate (ml/sec.) multiplied by scan duration<br />

(sec.). A bolus <strong>of</strong> 120-150 ml <strong>of</strong> the contrast medium is<br />

administered by power injector if scanning only the thoracic<br />

aorta, but it is increased to 200 ml if scanning both<br />

thoracic and abdominal aorta.<br />

6. The injection rate is 3 ml/sec. via a 22 gauge intravenous<br />

angio-catheter.<br />

7. A 30 second delay time is used between the start <strong>of</strong> injection<br />

and onset <strong>of</strong> scanning. Although timing scan is not<br />

routinely obtained at our institution, it may be acquired in<br />

patients with cardiac dysfunction to determine time delay<br />

for peak aortic enhancement. In this procedure, a bolus <strong>of</strong><br />

20 ml <strong>of</strong> contrast material is injected via a peripheral vein<br />

at a rate <strong>of</strong> 3 ml/sec. Beginning 10 seconds after the start<br />

<strong>of</strong> injection, 20 dynamic images are obtained at the level <strong>of</strong><br />

aortic arch at 2-second intervals (i.e., 1 sec./section scan<br />

acquisition time, 1 second interscan delay). A time attenuation<br />

curve is generated at the arch level by placing a<br />

region <strong>of</strong> interest (ROI) and delay time is calculated from<br />

the start <strong>of</strong> injection to peak aortic enhancement.<br />

Alternatively, the manufacturer’s automated technique such<br />

as “Smart Prep” (General Electric Medical Systems,<br />

Milwaukee, WI) or “Care Bolus” (Siemens, Erlangen,<br />

Germany) can be used where a series <strong>of</strong> low milliamperage<br />

(mA) single scans are obtained until the desired threshold<br />

density is reached and the high mA spiral aortic scan is<br />

performed.<br />

8. 120kV, 180-280 mAS, 0.8-second time per gantry rotation.<br />

9. The patient is hyperventilated 3 times prior to scanning and<br />

the scan is acquired in suspended inspiration.<br />

10. The field <strong>of</strong> view for the CT Angiogram is approximately<br />

20-25 cm, detector collimation is 2.5 mm, slice thickness is<br />

2.5 mm and the table speed is 15mm per gantry rotation<br />

(high speed HS mode). The images are acquired caudocranial<br />

from the aortic hiatus in the diaphragm to 2 cm<br />

above the arch.<br />

11. The images are reconstructed at 1.5 mm interval with standard<br />

reconstruction filter.<br />

12. Saggital oblique reformations (MPR) are performed<br />

through aortic arch at the scanner. Data is transferred to<br />

PACS workstation for interpretation. In selected cases,<br />

data is also transferred to clinical 3D laboratory for performing<br />

shaded surface display, curved planar reformations<br />

or maximum intensity projection. Every other image is<br />

printed on film as 20:1 format, axial contrast sequence at<br />

vascular window. Additionally the oblique saggital reformation<br />

images <strong>of</strong> aorta are also printed. (Although reformations<br />

do not improve sensitivity for the disease detection,<br />

they do better display the anatomic relationships and<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> disease in a format that is familiar to most clinicians.)<br />

UCLA has just installed a 16 channel Siemens Sensation 16<br />

scanner. The protocols for the clinical applications are being<br />

developed currently.<br />

Pitfalls in interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Thoracic</strong> Aortic Angiography<br />

A variety <strong>of</strong> pitfalls are encountered when interpreting CTA,<br />

particularly for aortic dissection and aneurysms. These are<br />

attributed to technical factors, streak artifacts, periaortic structures,<br />

aortic wall motion, aortic variations such as congenital<br />

ductus diverticulum or acquired aortic aneurysm, and penetrating<br />

atherosclerotic ulcer.<br />

Technical factors: Optimal contrast enhancement is critical<br />

to the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> aortic pathology, for example aortic dissection.<br />

Improper timing <strong>of</strong> contrast material administration relative<br />

to image acquisition or slow rate <strong>of</strong> injection may fail to<br />

opacify the lumen sufficiently to demonstrate intimal flap resulting<br />

in false - negative diagnosis.<br />

Streak artifacts: High attenuation material within or outside<br />

the patient may generate streak artifacts on both non-contrast<br />

and contrast enhanced images. These appear as straight parallel<br />

lines that radiate from a single point and generally exceed the<br />

confines <strong>of</strong> aorta. Conversely, intimal flaps are thin and<br />

smooth, slightly curved and restricted to aortic lumen.<br />

Strategies to reduce these artifacts include the use <strong>of</strong> diluted<br />

contrast material, injection <strong>of</strong> contrast material in right antecubital<br />

vein and acquiring scan in caudo-cranial direction.<br />

Periaortic Structures: Several vessels such as origins <strong>of</strong> arch<br />

vessels, left brachiocephalic, left superior intercostal and left<br />

pulmonary veins may simulate double lumen or intimal flap.<br />

Residual thymus, superior pericardial recess, atelectasis, pleural<br />

thickening or effusion, periaortic fibrosis or lymphoma can also<br />

simulate aortic dissection. These structures can be identified on<br />

reviewing contiguous images, and by the knowledge <strong>of</strong> normal<br />

anatomy.<br />

Aortic wall motion and normal aortic sinuses<br />

The pendular motion <strong>of</strong> ascending aorta produces curvilinear<br />

artifacts in the left anterior and right posterior aspect <strong>of</strong> aortic<br />

root. The combined pendular and circular motion <strong>of</strong> the aorta<br />

on the other hand produces a circumferential artifact over the<br />

ascending aorta. The motion artifact is restricted to only one or<br />

two adjacent scans. The artifact can be minimized by reconstructed<br />

images generated with 180° linear interpolation algorithm<br />

or by electrocardiographic gating <strong>of</strong> the scan.<br />

Normal aortic sinuses are recognized by their characteristic<br />

location at the same level as the proximal left coronary artery.<br />

Congenital aortic diverticulum and acquired aortic aneurysm<br />

Congenital aortic diverticulum appears as a smooth focal<br />

bulge with obtuse angles with the aortic wall. It is located at<br />

the aortic isthmus.<br />

A fusiform aneurysm with intraluminal thrombus may simulate<br />

aortic dissection with thrombosed false lumen. However,<br />

on non-contrast images high attenuation thrombosed false<br />

lumen and internal displacement <strong>of</strong> intimal calcification is seen<br />

in dissection. Calcification occurring on the surface <strong>of</strong> an intraluminal<br />

thrombus in an aneurysm is difficult to distinguish from<br />

aortic dissection.<br />

Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer<br />

It is an atheromatous lesion where the ulcer, a focal contrast<br />

material filled out-pouch protudes from the intima into the<br />

media and produces intramural hemorrhage. It generally occurs<br />

in descending aorta and an intimal flap is absent.<br />

101<br />

MONDAY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!