Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

MONDAY
124
46. Schoepf U, Holzknecht N, Helmberger TK, Crispin A, Hong C,
Becker CR, Reiser MF. Subsegmental Pulmonary Emboli:
Improved Detection with Thin-Collimation Multidetector-Row
Spiral CT. Radiology 2002; 222:483-490.
47. Baile E, King GG, Muller NL, D´Yachkova Y, Coche EE, Pare
PD, Mayo JR. Spiral computed tomography is comparable to
angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J
Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161:1010-1015.
48. Gottschalk A, Stein PD, Goodman LR, Sostman HD. Overview
of Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism
Diagnosis II. Semin Nucl Med 2002; 32:173-82.
49. Oser RF, Zuckerman DA, Gutierrez FR, Brink JA. Anatomic
Distribution of Pulmonary Emboli at Pulmonary Angiography:
Implications for Cross Sectional Imaging. Radiology 1996;
199:31-35.
50. Tetalman MR, Hoffer PB, Heck LL, Kunzmann A, Gottschalk
A. Perfusion Lung Scan in Normal Volunteers. Radiology
1973; 106:593-594.
51. Novelline R, Baltarowich O, Athanasoulis C, Greenfield A,
McKusick K. The Clinical Course of Patients with Suspected
Pulmonary Embolism and a Negative Pulmonary Angiogram.
Radiology 1978; 126:561-567.
52. Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, et al. Subsequent pulmonary
embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary
angiogram--prospective comparison with scintigraphy [see
comments]. Radiology 2000; 215:535-42.
53. Patriquin L, Khorasani R, Polak JF. Correlation of Diagnostic
Imaging and Subsequent Autopsy Findings in Patients with
Pulmonary Embolism. AJR 1998; 171:347-349.
54. Garg K, Sieler H, Welsh CH, et al. Clinical validity of helical
CT being interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism:
implications for patient treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;
172:1627-31.
55. Gottsater A, Berg A, Centergard J, et al. Clinically suspected
pulmonary embolism: is it safe to withhold anticoagulation
after a negative spiral CT? Eur Radiol 2001; 11:65-72.
56. Ost D, Rozenshtein A, Saffran L, Snider A. The negative predictive
value of spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis
of pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation-perfusion
scans. Am J Med 2001; 110:16-21.
57. Tillie-Leblond I, Mastora I, Radenne F, et al. Risk of pulmonary
embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in
patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up
study. Radiology 2002; 223:461-7.
58. Swensen SJ, Sheedy PF, 2nd, Ryu JH, et al. Outcomes after
withholding anticoagulation from patients with suspected
acute pulmonary embolism and negative computed tomographic
findings: a cohort study. Mayo Clin Proc 2002; 77:130-
8.
59. Goldhaber S. Pulmonary Embolism Thrombolysis. Broadening
the Paradigm for its Application. Circulation 1997; 96:716-718.
60. Konstantinides S GA, Olschewski M, Heinrich F, Grosser K,
Rauber K, Iversen S, Redecker M, Kienast J, Just H, Kasper
W. Association Between Thrombolytic Treatment and the
Prognosis of Hemodynamically Stable Patients With Major
Pulmonary Embolism. Results of a Multicenter Registry.
Circulation 1997; 96:882-888.
61. Hoffman E, Tajik JK, Petersen G, Reiners TJ, Thompson BH,
Stanford W. Perfusion Deficit Versus Anatomic Visualization in
Detection of Pulmonary Emboli Via Electron-Beam CT:
Validation in Swine. In Hoffman E, ed. Medical Imaging 1995:
Physiology and Function from Multidimensional Images, Proc.
SPIE 2433, 1995. pp. 26-36.
62. Hoffman E, McLennan G. Assessment of the Pulmonary
Structure-Function Relationship and Clinical Outcome
Measures: Quantitative Volumetric CT of the Lung. Acad
Radiol 1997; 4:758-776.
63. Stanford W, Rooholamini SA, Galvin JR. Ultrafast Computed
Tomography in the Detection of Intracardiac Masses and
Pulmonary Artery Thrombembolism. In Stanford W RJ, ed.
Ultrafast Computed Tomography in Cardiac Imaging:
Principles and Practice. Mount Kisco, NY: Futura Publishing
Co., Inc., 1992.
64. Wolfkiel C, Ferguson JL, Chomka EV, Law WR, Labin IN,
Tenzer ML, Booker M, Brundage BH. Measurement of
Myocardial Blood Flow by Ultrafast Computed Tomography.
Circulation 1987; 76:1262-1273.
65. Rumberger J, Feiring AJ, Lipton MJ, Higgins CB, Ell SR,
Marcus ML. Use of ultrafast computed tomography to quantitate
regional myocardial perfusion: a preliminary report. J Am
Coll Cardiol 1987; 9:59-69.
66. Brundage B. Beyond Perfusion with Ultrafast Computed
Tomography. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75:69D-73D.
67. Gobbel G, Cann CE, Iwamoto HS, Fike JR. Measurement of
Regional Cerebral Blood Flow in the Dog Using Ultrafast
Computed Tomography, Experimental Validation. Stroke 1991;
22:772-779.
68. Lerman L, Taler SJ, Textor SC, Sheedy PF II, Stanson AW,
Romero JC. Computed Tomography-Derived Intrarenal Blood
Flow in Renovascular and Essential Hypertension. Kidney
International 1995; 49:846-854.
69. Wolfkiel C, Rich S. Analysis of Regional Pulmonary
Enhancement in Dogs by Ultrafast Computed Tomography.
Invest Radiol 1992; 27:211-216.
70. Hoffman E, Tajik JK, Kugelmass SD. Matching Pulmonary
Structure and Perfusion Via Combined Dynamic Multislice CT
and Thin-Slice High-Resoluton CT. Comput Med Imaging
Graph 1995; 19:101-112.
71. Rumberger J. Ultrafast Computed Tomography Scanning
Modes, Scanning Planes and Practical Aspects of Contrast
Administration. In Stanford W RJ, ed. Ultrafast Computed
Tomography in Cardiac Imaging: Principles and Practice.
Mount Kisco, NY: Futura Publishing Co., Inc., 1992. pp. 17-24.
72. McCollough C, Morin RL. The Technical Design and
Performance of Ultrafast Computed Tomography. Radiol Clin
North Am 1994; 32:521-536.
73. Rumberger J, Bell MR, Feiring AJ, Behrenbeck T, Marcus ML,
Ritman EL. Measurement of Myocardial Perfusion Using Fast
Computed Tomography. In Marcus M, Schelbert HL, Skorton
DJ, Wolf GL, ed. Cardiac Imaging. A companion to
Braunwald´s Heart Disease. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co,
1991. pp. 688-702.
74. Thompson H, Starmer CF, Whalen RE, McIntosh HD. Indicator
Transit Time Considered as a Gamma Variate. Circulation
Research 1964; 14:502-512.
75. Rhodes C, Valind SO, Brudin LH, Wollmer PE, Jones T,
Buckingham PD, Hughes JMB. Quantification of Regional V/Q
Ratios in Humans by Use of PET. II Procedure and Normal
Values. J Appl Physiol 1989; 66:1905-1913.
76. Kirchner J, Kickuth R, Laufer U, et al. Optimized enhancement
in helical CT: experiences with a real-time bolus tracking system
in 628 patients. Clin Radiol 2000; 55:368-73.
77. Hopper KD, Mosher TJ, Kasales CJ, et al. Thoracic spiral CT:
delivery of contrast material pushed with injectable saline
solution in a power injector. Radiology 1997; 205:269-71.
78. Haage P, Schmitz-Rode T, Hubner D, et al. Reduction of contrast
material dose and artifacts by a saline flush using a double
power injector in helical CT of the thorax. AJR Am J
Roentgenol 2000; 174:1049-53.
79. Bae K, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic peak
enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate-pharmacokinetic
analysis and experimental porcine model.
Radiology 1998; 206:455-464.