24.12.2012 Views

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUNDAY<br />

46<br />

One type <strong>of</strong> direct-readout system is a large-area, solid-state<br />

x-ray detector consisting <strong>of</strong> a structured Cesium Iodide (CsI)<br />

scintillator directly coupled to an array <strong>of</strong> amorphous silicon<br />

thin-film photodiodes and readout electronics. The multi-layered<br />

detector is manufactured on a glass substrate, approximately 41<br />

cm square. When exposed to x-rays, the visible light is channeled<br />

within the CsI crystal matrix directly to the photodiode<br />

array where the electric charge is collected and digitized, forming<br />

the digital image. Because <strong>of</strong> its direct-readout design,<br />

structured scintillator, and the use <strong>of</strong> very-low-noise electronics,<br />

this flat-panel detector is anticipated to provide exceptionally<br />

high image quality.<br />

Another style <strong>of</strong> direct-readout digital detectors utilizes the<br />

same type <strong>of</strong> TFT array for charge collection and readout, but<br />

the active detector element is amorphous selenium instead <strong>of</strong> a<br />

scintillator and photodiode. Because selenium is an x-ray photoconductor,<br />

x-ray photons striking the detector are converted<br />

directly to electrical charge with no intermediate (visible light)<br />

stage. This direct conversion eliminates one step in image production,<br />

and thus removes one opportunity for noise to enter the<br />

imaging chain.<br />

Image quality from digital acquisition systems is influenced<br />

by detector materials, design, and electronics, and it is unknown<br />

at this time which style <strong>of</strong> direct-readout digital x-ray receptor<br />

will <strong>of</strong>fer superior performance. It is clear, however, that largearea,<br />

direct-readout digital detectors <strong>of</strong>fer expanded opportunities<br />

in the radiology department.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Blume H, Jost RG. Chest imaging within the radiology department<br />

by means <strong>of</strong> photostimulable phosphor computed radiography:<br />

a review. [Review]. J Digit <strong>Imaging</strong> 5(2):67-78, 1992.<br />

2. Schaefer CM, Greene R, Oestmann JW, et al. Digital storage<br />

phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CTdocumented<br />

chest disease. <strong>Radiology</strong> 174(1):207-210, 1990.<br />

3. Dobbins JT III, Rice JJ, Beam CA, Ravin CE: Threshold perception<br />

performance with computed and screen-film radiography:<br />

Implications for chest radiography. <strong>Radiology</strong> 183:179-<br />

187, 1992.<br />

4. Kido S, Ikezoe J, Takeuchi N, et al. Interpretation <strong>of</strong> subtle<br />

interstitial lung abnormalities: conventional versus storage<br />

phosphor radiography. <strong>Radiology</strong> 187(2):527-533, 1993.<br />

5. Neitzel U, Maack I, Gunther-Kohfahl S. Image quality <strong>of</strong> a digital<br />

chest radiography system based on a selenium detector.<br />

Med Phys 21:509-516, 1994.<br />

6. Chotas HG, Floyd C Jr., Ravin CE. Technical evaluation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

digital chest radiography system that uses a selenium detector.<br />

<strong>Radiology</strong> 195(1):264-270, 1995.<br />

7. Floyd CE, Baker JA, Chotas HG, Delong DM, Ravin CE.<br />

Selenium-based digital radiography <strong>of</strong> the chest: radiologists'<br />

preference compared with film-screen radiographs. AJR<br />

165(6):1353-1358, 1995.<br />

8. Chotas HG, Dobbins JT, Ravin CE: Principles <strong>of</strong> digital radiography<br />

using large-area, electronically-readable detectors: A<br />

review <strong>of</strong> the basics. <strong>Radiology</strong> 210(3):595-599, March 1999.<br />

9. Floyd CE, Warp RJ, Dobbins JT, Chotas HG, Baydush AH,<br />

Vargas-Voracek R, Ravin, CE: <strong>Imaging</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> an<br />

amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.<br />

<strong>Radiology</strong> 218(3):683-688, March 2001.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!