24.12.2012 Views

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

Thoracic Imaging 2003 - Society of Thoracic Radiology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MONDAY<br />

118<br />

AJRCCM Prospective CTA Validation, 2002<br />

Fortunately, there are some well-constructed and logical<br />

studies that confirm the clinical role <strong>of</strong> CTA- even single slice<br />

CTA- and document the accuracy <strong>of</strong> a negative CTA during follow-up<br />

intervals. Lorut et al. reported results in a prospective<br />

(n=247) cohort <strong>of</strong> patients suspected <strong>of</strong> PE and studied with<br />

CTA, V/Q, and d-dimer levels all within 24 hours [18]. Gold<br />

standars for diagnosis included:<br />

Positive PE: CTA positive or DVT US positive (US was performed<br />

only if the if CTA was negative or inconclusive and the<br />

VQ was nondiagnostic)<br />

Negative PE: CTA negative and one <strong>of</strong> other stated criteria met<br />

The prevalence PE in the cohort was 42%; CT diagnosed<br />

73% <strong>of</strong> these cases; US 23%; VQ 4% (VQ diagnoses were only<br />

in patients who did not undergo CT, US diagnosed DVT, not<br />

PE). The mortality rates in patients with (treated) and without<br />

(not treated) PE were comparable; recurrent PE /DVT rate was<br />

1-2% in each group. The authors conclude that CTA positive<br />

diagnoses are reliable, negative CTA results were never overturned<br />

unless by leg ultrasound showing DVT, and that the VQ<br />

is superfluous.<br />

Outcomes After Negative CTA: European Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Radiology</strong>, 2001<br />

Several outcomes studies are also now available documenting<br />

negligible PE or DVT rates in patients 3-6 months after negative<br />

CTA. Gottsater et al. reported 3-month outcomes in 305<br />

patients studied with CTA for possible PE; 61 (20%) had a CTA<br />

diagnosis <strong>of</strong> PE, and 215 <strong>of</strong> the negative CTA group were followed<br />

and not treated. Three (1.4%) <strong>of</strong> these patients developed<br />

DVT or PE; 2 had underlying advanced malignancy and one had<br />

COPD [19]. The authors conclude that patient outcomes after<br />

negative CTA are no different than outcomes reported after normal<br />

VQ or conventional angiography.<br />

Outcomes After Negative CTA in High risk Patients, 2001<br />

Ost et al. studied 103 patients who had intermediate or low<br />

probability VQ scans and a high clinical suspicion for PE with<br />

CTA: 22 were positive, 71 negative, and 10 indeterminate. Only<br />

3 <strong>of</strong> the 71 patients with negative CTA had a PE in a 6 month<br />

follow-up period [20]. Thus, even in these symptomatic patients<br />

with non-normal scintigraphy, negative CTA appears to be safe.<br />

This has been our clinical experience as well.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

• CTA has all the desired attributes <strong>of</strong> a test for PE/DVT<br />

• Multi-channel CTA is an angiogram- but better<br />

• The accuracy, particularly <strong>of</strong> multi-channel CTA, exceeds<br />

100% for PE<br />

• Multi-channel CTA is the best test for subsegmental (and<br />

smaller) clot<br />

• CTA allows rapid estimate <strong>of</strong> clot age and extent<br />

• CTA facilitates other diagnoses in the chest and allows leg<br />

vein assessment<br />

• Perfusion analysis and color volumetric images possible in<br />

the near future<br />

• Not all CTA is the same: beware simplistic accuracy quotes<br />

and meta-analyses<br />

• Be suspect <strong>of</strong> the literature: especially if no radiologist is involved<br />

• New research directions: redo all aspects <strong>of</strong> PE from physiology<br />

to treatment<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Siddique RM, Siddique MI, Rimm AA. Trends in pulmonary<br />

embolism mortality in the US elderly population: 1984 through<br />

1991. Am J Public Health 1998; 88(3):478-480.<br />

2. Goldhaber SZ, Hennekens CH, Evans DA, et al. Factors<br />

associated with the correct antemortem diagnosis <strong>of</strong> major<br />

pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 1982; 73:822-826.<br />

3. Proctor MC, Greenfield LJ. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis,<br />

incidence, and implications. Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 5(1):77-81.<br />

4. Monreal M, Ruiz J, Olazabal A, Arias A, Roca J. Deep venous<br />

thrombosis and the risk <strong>of</strong> pulmonary embolism: a systematic<br />

study. Chest 1992; 102:667-681.<br />

5. Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, et al. A clinical trial <strong>of</strong><br />

vena cava filters in the prevention <strong>of</strong> pulmonary embolism in<br />

patients with proximal deep venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med<br />

1998; 338:409-415.<br />

6. The PIOPED investigators. Value <strong>of</strong> the ventilation/perfusion<br />

scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results <strong>of</strong> the Prospective<br />

Investigation <strong>of</strong> Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED).<br />

JAMA 1990; 263:2753-2759.<br />

7. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F. Diagnosis <strong>of</strong> pulmonary<br />

embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary<br />

angiography and scintigraphy. <strong>Radiology</strong> 1996; 200:699-706.<br />

8. Quinn MF, Lundell CJ, Klotz TA, et al. Reliability <strong>of</strong> selective<br />

pulmonary arteriography in the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> pulmonary<br />

embolism. AJR 1987; 149:469-471.<br />

9. Stein PD, Henry JW, Relyea B. Untreated patients with pulmonary<br />

embolism: outcome, clinical, and laboratory assessment.<br />

Chest 1995; 107:931-935.<br />

10. Breslaw BH, Dorfman GS. Ventilation/perfusion scanning for<br />

prediction <strong>of</strong> the location <strong>of</strong> pulmonary emboli: correlation with<br />

pulmonary angiographic findings. <strong>Radiology</strong> 1992; 185:180-185.<br />

11. Stein PD, Henry JW. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> acute pulmonary<br />

embolism in central and subsegmental pulmonary arteries<br />

and relation to probability interpretation <strong>of</strong> ventilation/perfusion<br />

lung scans. Chest 1997; 111:1246-1248.<br />

12. Cross JJL, Kemp PM, Walsh CG, Flower CDR, Dixon AK. A<br />

randomized trial <strong>of</strong> spiral CT and ventilation perfusion scintigraphy<br />

for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> pulmonary embolism. Clin Radiol<br />

1998; 53:177-182.<br />

13. van Rossum AB, Pattynama PMT, Mallens WMC, Hermans J,<br />

Heijerman HGM. Can helical CT replace scintigraphy in the<br />

diagnostic process in suspected pulmonary embolism? A<br />

retrolective-prolective cohort study focusing on total diagnostic<br />

yield. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:90-96.<br />

14. ACCP Consensus Committee on Pulmonary Embolism.<br />

Opinions regarding the diagnosis and management <strong>of</strong> venous<br />

thromboembolic disease. Chest 1998; 113:499-504.<br />

15. Rathbun SW, Raskob GE, Whitsett TL. Sensitivity and specificity<br />

<strong>of</strong> helical computed tomography in the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> pulmonary<br />

embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2000;<br />

132:227-232.<br />

16. Perrier A, Howarth N, Didier D, Loubeyre P, Unger PF, de<br />

Moerloose P, Slosman D, Junod A, Bounameaux H.<br />

Performance <strong>of</strong> helical computed tomography in unselected<br />

outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern<br />

Med 2001; 135(17):88-97.<br />

17. Velmahos GC, Vassiliu P, Wilcox A, Hanks SE, Salim A,<br />

Harrel D, Palmer S, Demetriades D. Spiral computed tomography<br />

for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> pulmonary embolism in critically ill<br />

surgical patients: a comparison with pulmonary angiography.<br />

Arch Surg 2001; 136(5):505-11.<br />

18. Lorut C, Ghossains M, Horellou MH, Achkar A, Fretault J,<br />

Laaban JP. A noninvasive diagnostic strategy including spiral<br />

computed tomography in patients with suspected pulmonary<br />

embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000 Oct;162:1413-8.<br />

19. Gottsater A, Berg A, Centergard J, Frennby B, Nirhov N,<br />

Nyman U. Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: is it safe<br />

to withhold anticoagulation after a negative spiral CT? Eur<br />

Radiol 2001;11(1):65-72.<br />

20. Ost D, Rozenshtein A, Saffran L, Snider A. The negative predictive<br />

value <strong>of</strong> spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis<br />

<strong>of</strong> pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation-perfusion<br />

scans. Am J Med 2001;110(1):16-21.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!