MRP

Info

5.1 | conceptual framework5.2 | design toolkitThis Project’s conceptual framework andsubsequent design toolkit aim to addressthe challenges and barriers of bicycling inextreme heat environments.The five identified challenges are usedcontextually to examine and extractrelevant information from the study sites.With a comprehensive investigation,extrapolation, and utilisation process, sevenkey design principles naturally emerge.These design principles – which areextensively inspired by the literature reviewand case study analysis – look to physicallyaddress these challenges and barriers tobicycling.The entire framework serves as anexpandable and scalable set of strategiesand principles that can be applied to builtenvironments elsewhere.Emerging from the framework are sevenkey design principles aimed at physicallyaddressing the challenges, barriers, andvacancies of extreme heat environments inAmerican suburbs:1. Separation2. Variety3. Shading4. Safe Junctions5. Routing6. Activation7. ConnectivityThese are then used to propose designinterventions on the study sites, where theframework and toolkit are theoreticallytested.34
1Identify the specific needs and barriers to bicycling in the physical and political environmentInvestigate challenges32Gather applicable and climate-sensitive aspects to induce increased bicycle mode shareculture infrastructuresafety effort comfort4 Extrapolate solutions5Contexualise & Analysemissingcomponentsexisting routes& typesland use& urban formexistingmode share6Utilise comprehensive strategiesnudgededicate infrastructurefacilitateincentivise7Identify applicable design principles8Transpose design principles to siteseparation variety shading safe junctions routing activationconnectivityF18: Conceptual framework35
Page 1 and 2: encouraging cycling in extreme heat
Page 3 and 4: abstractThe bicycle has played a ro
Page 5 and 6: introduction11. introduction2. site
Page 7 and 8: 1.1 | introductionThis Major Resear
Page 9 and 10: american suburbia: active travel by
Page 11 and 12: 2.1 | methodologyThis Project’s m
Page 13 and 14: introductionmethodology121. introdu
Page 15 and 16: Morelikely toachievelong-termchange
Page 17 and 18: 2021; Pearson et al., 2022) This ev
Page 19 and 20: Effort(2) effort; (3) comfort; (4)
Page 23 and 24: carmelbarcelonataipei*flower mounds
Page 25 and 26: STREETYSTAL LARY LASTARTHUR STT STA
Page 27 and 28: F12: Taipei Cycle Map27
Page 29 and 30: F14: Carmel Cycle Map29
Page 31 and 32: F16: Barcelona Cycle Map31
Page 33: introductionmethodology121. introdu
Page 37 and 38: 5.3 | design principlesseparationSe
Page 39 and 40: F22: Variation in pathways39
Page 41 and 42: F24: Different types of bicycle use
Page 43 and 44: 43TravbaneparkenTravbaneparkenIdræ
Page 45 and 46: page left blank45
Page 47 and 48: Location: Flower Mound, Texas, Unit
Page 49 and 50: 6.2 | site analysisFlower Mound’s
Page 51 and 52: flower mounddfw int’l airport40 -
Page 53 and 54: fm 2499 | existing condition~54m7.5
Page 55 and 56: fm 1171 | existing condition~50m7.5
Page 57 and 58: fm 3040 | existing condition~34m2 1
Page 59 and 60: morriss road | existing condition~5
Page 63 and 64: 7.1 | safe junctions (ex. 2)At the
Page 65 and 66: 7.2 | activation of space (ex. 2)Th
Page 67 and 68: primary principlesF46: Site 1 Propo
Page 69 and 70: F48: Site 2 Proposalprimary princip
Page 75 and 76: 8.1 | conclusions & reflectionsThis
Page 77 and 78: flower-mound.com/131/GIS-Maps. (Acc
Page 79 and 80: F23: Shaded pathways and facilities
Page 81 and 82: RISK ASSESSMENT FORMFIELD / LOCATIO
Page 83 and 84: ILL HEALTHe.g. accident, illness,pe
Page 85 and 86:
XSelect the appropriate statement:I
Page 87 and 88:
Respondent: Ben Meador Submitted on
Page 89 and 90:
Any expression of opinion about the
show all

MRP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?