MRP

Info

Autelitano, F. & Giuliani, F. (2021) Colored Bicycle Lanes and Intersection Treatments:International Overview and Best Practices. Journal of Traffic and TransportationEngineering (English Edition), 2021.Bigazzi, A. et al. (2022) Physiological markers of traffic-related stress during active travel.Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour. [Online] 84223–238.Bopp, M. et al. (2012) Active commuting influences among adults. Preventive medicine.[Online] 54 (3), 237–241.Boufous, S. et al. (2021) Facilitators and barriers to cycling in older residents of New SouthWales, Australia. Journal of transport & health. [Online] 21101056–.Buehler, R. & Dill, J. (2016) Bikeway Networks: A Review of Effects on Cycling. Transportreviews. [Online] 36 (1), 9–27.Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (2020) Average Cost of Owning and Operating anAutomobile. [online] Available at: https://www.bts.gov/content/average-cost-owning-andoperating-automobilea-assuming-15000-vehicle-miles-year. (Accessed on 25 February2022).Butterworth, E. & Pojani, D. (2018) Why Isn’t Australia a Cycling Mecca?. EuropeanTransport. [Online].referencesColville-Andersen, M. (2018) Copenhagenize : the definitive guide to global bicycleurbanism / Mikael Colville-Andersen. Washington, DC: Island Press.Corcoran, J. et al. (2014) Spatio-temporal patterns of a Public Bicycle Sharing Program:the effect of weather and calendar events. Journal of transport geography. [Online]41292–305.Cortright, J. (2015) Even If You Don’t Drive, You’re Still Paying for Everyone Who Does.[online] The Atlantic. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/10/driving-true- costs/412237/ (Accessed 02 Apr. 2022).den Hoed, W. & Jarvis, H. (2021) Normalising cycling mobilities: an age-friendly approachto cycling in the Netherlands. Applied mobilities. [Online] ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print),1–21Dill, J. & Carr, T. (2003) Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You BuildThem, Commuters Will Use Them. Transportation research record. [Online] 1828 (1), 116–123.Dill, J. & Voros, K. (2007) Factors Affecting Bicycling Demand : Initial Survey Findingsfrom the Portland, Oregon, Region: Bicycles and Motorcycles. Transportation researchrecord. (2031), 9–17.Fields, B. et al. (2022) Active transportation pilot program evaluation: A longitudinalassessment of bicycle facility density changes on use in Minneapolis. Transportationresearch interdisciplinary perspectives. [Online] 14100604–.Town of Flower Mound (2022) Flower Mound GIS Open Data. Available at: https://www.76
flower-mound.com/131/GIS-Maps. (Accessed on 20 June 2022).Garrard, J., Crawford, S., & Hakman, N. (2006) Revolutions for Women: Increasingwomen’s participation in cycling for recreation and transport (Executive Summary).Gössling, S., Nicolosi, J. and Litman, T. (2021) The Health Cost of Transport in Cities.Current Environmental Health Reports.Groot, R. de (2016) Design manual for bicycle traffic / editor-in-chief Rik de Groot. Rik deGroot (ed.). Ede, The Netherlands: CROW.Heesch, K. C. et al. (2012) Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling:a cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, andconstraints. The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.[Online] 9 (1), 106–106.Higgins, R. & Ahern, A. (2021) Students’ and Parents’ Perceptions of Barriers to Cycling toSchool—An Analysis by Gender. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland). [Online] 13 (23), 13213–.Jacobson, S. H. et al. (2011) A note on the relationship between obesity and driving.Transport policy. [Online] 18 (5), 772–776.Krizek, K., Forsyth, A., Baum, L. (2009) Walking and cycling international literaturereview. Report for Department of Transport, Melbourne.Lubans, D.R. et al. (2011) The relationship between active travel to school and healthrelatedfitness in children and adolescents: a systematic review. International Journal ofBehavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8(1), pp.1-12.Maibach, E. et al. (2009) Promoting physical activity and reducing climate change:Opportunities to replace short car trips with active transportation. Preventive medicine.[Online] 49 (4), 326–327.Manaugh, K. et al. (2016) Overcoming barriers to cycling: understanding frequency ofcycling in a University setting and the factors preventing commuters from cycling on aregular basis. Transportation (Dordrecht). [Online] 44 (4), 871–884.Marohn, C. L. (2019) Strong Towns: A Bottom-Up Revolution to Rebuild AmericanProsperity. Newark: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.Masoumi, H. E. (2019) A discrete choice analysis of transport mode choice causality andperceived barriers of sustainable mobility in the MENA region. Transport policy. [Online]7937–53.Noland, R. B. (2021) Scootin’ in the rain: Does weather affect micromobility?Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice. [Online] 149114–123.Pollution: Review of Recent Epidemiological Evidence. Inhalation toxicology. [Online] 19(S1), 33–38.Prud’homme, R. & Lee, C.-W. (1999) Size, Sprawl, Speed and the Efficiency of Cities.Urban studies (Edinburgh, Scotland). [Online] 36 (11), 1849–1858.Pucher, J. & Buehler, R. (2006) Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: Acomparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies. Transport policy. [Online] 13 (3),265–279.Rosen, P. et al. (2007) Cycling and society / edited by Paul Rosen, Peter Cox, and DavidHorton. Aldershot: Ashgate. 70.Saelens, B. E. et al. (2003) Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings fromthe transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of behavioral medicine.[Online] 25 (2), 80–91.Schuster, C. et al. (2016) Urban heat stress: novel survey suggests health and fitness asfuture avenue for research and adaptation strategies. Environmental research letters.[Online] 12 (4), 44021–.Sun, Q.C. et al. (2021) A human-centred assessment framework to prioritise heatmitigation efforts for active travel at city scale. Science of the Total Environment, 763,p.143033.Texas A&M University (2018). Dismount Zone Expansion. Available at: https://transport.tamu.edu/WebFS/Transport/TSAC/presentations/2018/DismountZones.pdf. (Accessed on20 June 2022).Titze, S. et al. (2008) Association of built-environment, social-environment and personalfactors with bicycling as a mode of transportation among Austrian city dwellers.Preventive medicine. [Online] 47 (3), 252–259.Transport for NSW (2020) Cycleway Design Toolbox: Designing for cycling andmicromobility. Available at: https://www.movementandplace.nsw.gov.au/designprinciples/guides-and-tools/cycleway-design-toolkit-designing-cycling-and-micromobility.(Accessed on 20 June 2022).Vietinghoff, C. (2021) An intersectional analysis of barriers to cycling for marginalizedcommunities in a cycling-friendly French City. Journal of transport geography. [Online]91102967–.Whitehurst, D. G. T. et al. (2021) An economic analysis of the health-related benefitsassociated with bicycle infrastructure investment in three Canadian cities. PloS one.[Online] 16 (2), e0246419–e0246419.Pearson, L. et al. (2022) Adults’ self-reported barriers and enablers to riding a bike fortransport: a systematic review. Transport reviews. [Online] ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print),1–29.Pope, C. A. (2007) Mortality Effects of Longer Term Exposures to Fine Particulate Air77
Page 1 and 2:
encouraging cycling in extreme heat
Page 3 and 4:
abstractThe bicycle has played a ro
Page 5 and 6:
introduction11. introduction2. site
Page 7 and 8:
1.1 | introductionThis Major Resear
Page 9 and 10:
american suburbia: active travel by
Page 11 and 12:
2.1 | methodologyThis Project’s m
Page 13 and 14:
introductionmethodology121. introdu
Page 15 and 16:
Morelikely toachievelong-termchange
Page 17 and 18:
2021; Pearson et al., 2022) This ev
Page 19 and 20:
Effort(2) effort; (3) comfort; (4)
Page 21 and 22:
introductionmethodology121. introdu
Page 23 and 24:
carmelbarcelonataipei*flower mounds
Page 25 and 26: STREETYSTAL LARY LASTARTHUR STT STA
Page 27 and 28: F12: Taipei Cycle Map27
Page 29 and 30: F14: Carmel Cycle Map29
Page 31 and 32: F16: Barcelona Cycle Map31
Page 33 and 34: introductionmethodology121. introdu
Page 35 and 36: 1Identify the specific needs and ba
Page 37 and 38: 5.3 | design principlesseparationSe
Page 39 and 40: F22: Variation in pathways39
Page 41 and 42: F24: Different types of bicycle use
Page 43 and 44: 43TravbaneparkenTravbaneparkenIdræ
Page 45 and 46: page left blank45
Page 47 and 48: Location: Flower Mound, Texas, Unit
Page 49 and 50: 6.2 | site analysisFlower Mound’s
Page 51 and 52: flower mounddfw int’l airport40 -
Page 53 and 54: fm 2499 | existing condition~54m7.5
Page 55 and 56: fm 1171 | existing condition~50m7.5
Page 57 and 58: fm 3040 | existing condition~34m2 1
Page 59 and 60: morriss road | existing condition~5
Page 61 and 62: introductionmethodology121. introdu
Page 63 and 64: 7.1 | safe junctions (ex. 2)At the
Page 65 and 66: 7.2 | activation of space (ex. 2)Th
Page 67 and 68: primary principlesF46: Site 1 Propo
Page 69 and 70: F48: Site 2 Proposalprimary princip
Page 75: 8.1 | conclusions & reflectionsThis
Page 79 and 80: F23: Shaded pathways and facilities
Page 81 and 82: RISK ASSESSMENT FORMFIELD / LOCATIO
Page 83 and 84: ILL HEALTHe.g. accident, illness,pe
Page 85 and 86: XSelect the appropriate statement:I
Page 87 and 88: Respondent: Ben Meador Submitted on
Page 89 and 90: Any expression of opinion about the
show all

MRP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?