MRP

list of figures
F1a: Outline of Flower Mound, Texas
F1b: Change in Flower Mound’s built context over time
F2: Problem definition chart with location context
F3: Methodology
F4: Strategies, Principles, and Examples from Literature Review
F5: Design Principles origins
F6: Strategies and examples
F7: Average weather of case study cities & overview
F8: study site and case studies
F9: Case study of Sydney, Australia
F10: Sydney Cycle Map
F11: Case study of Taipei, Taiwan
F12: Taipei Cycle Map
F13: Case study of Carmel, Indiana
F14: Carmel Cycle Map
F15: Case study of Barcelona, Spain
F16: Barcelona Cycle Map
F17: Case study comparison
F18: Conceptual framework
F19: Strategies and their relevant Design Principles
F20: Explanation of Design Principles
F21: Separated cycle infrastructure
F22: Variation in pathways
F23: Shaded pathways and facilities
F24: Different types of bicycle users
F25: Activated spaces by Better Block
F26: Connected bicycle networks
F27: Safe junctions and their components
F28: The built form of Flower Mound & demographics
F29: Flower Mound’s existing trails and bikeways
F30a: American built environments through the 20th century
F30b: Streets, roads, buildings, and pathways in Flower Mound
F31: Study sites within geographic context
F32: Flower Mound’s vicinity to Dallas
F33: Site 1 Analysis
F34: Site 1 existing sections
F35: Site 2 Analysis
F36: Site 2 existing sections
F37: Site 3 Analysis
F38: Site 3 existing sections
F39: Site 4 Analysis
F40: Site 4 existing sections
F41: Junction 1 interventions & context
F42: Junction 2 interventions & context
F43: Activation space example 1
F44: Activation space example 2
F45: Site 1 proposed section interventions
F46: Site 1 Proposal
F47: Site 2 proposed section interventions
F48: Site 2 Proposal
F49: Site 3 proposed section interventions
F50: Site 3 Proposal
F51: Site 4 proposed section interventions
F52: Site 4 Proposal
4