13.06.2023 Views

9781626569768

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

consider what navigating the already treacherous terrain of rapid body

change might be like for bodies that do not fit the definition of normal.

What of the child whose gender identity does not match the changes their

body is experiencing during puberty? What of the child navigating puberty

in a fat body or a body with chronic illness? Our experiences of body shame

are layered upon and impacted by the intersections of our identities. The

less “normal” our identity, the more fraught the waters of body shame.

Research shows that nearly 50 percent of transgender youth have seriously

thought about suicide, and 25 percent report that they have made a suicide

attempt. 4 How we are treated during puberty can be not only life-altering

but life-threatening for some young people. As we consider our own bodyshame

origin story, we have potent access to a deeper empathy for all

bodies.

Body shame is often a result of our burgeoning consciousness about our

own difference. Whew, we sure do have a long-standing battle with our

difference. Our first encounter with noticing our difference might have been

when Billy in second grade pointed out that we had the biggest schnozzle…

ahem… nose in the class. Maybe that consciousness came into focus with

the awareness of our racial or sexual identities. Humans struggle with that

second Peace. Part of our evolutionary success can be attributed to our skill

at quickly assessing danger. “Nope, that is not a person; that is a boa

constrictor!” See, quick! In an evolutionary sense, humans’ ability to

discern difference assured that we stayed near the top of the food chain.

Whereas noticing difference was historically necessary, modern humans

have continued to use difference to sort ourselves, conflating difference

with danger. Our rapid assessment of difference can be understood through

a psychosocial dynamic called “in-group out-group bias.” In 1982,

researcher Henry Tajfel divided people into two random groups. He found

that people began to favor their random group over people in the other

random group (emphasis on random), at times even rationalizing reasons

for the other group’s immorality or poor character to justify disliking them. 5

Our ancient ancestors’ battles for resources, food, even mates ensured that

humans needed to find ways to identify who was part of their tribe and who

was not. This in-group out-group distinction also meant that those outside

our group were seen as a threat to our resources. Ultimately we are wired to

recognize difference and maybe even distrust it. However, we were also

wired to eat bugs and to poop in a hole in the ground. The point being, we

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!