13.06.2023 Views

9781626569768

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

political service while excusing gender discrimination by using outdated,

disparaging tropes about female intelligence, ability, and acumen as

justification for that bias. Naomi Wolfe, journalist and author of The Beauty

Myth, writes, “A culture fixated on female thinness is not an obsession

about female beauty but an obsession about female obedience. Dieting is

the most potent political sedative in history. A quietly mad population is a

tractable one.” 31

Wolfe strategically illustrates how body-shame social messaging is used

as a means of controlling and centralizing political power. We need look no

further than the 2016 U.S. presidential election to see Wolfe’s thesis in

action. Candidate Hillary Clinton was exhaustingly scrutinized about her

aesthetic presentation. Outfits, makeup, hairstyles were all fodder for the

twenty-four-hour news cycle. Even the pro-Hillary, hundred-thousand-plusmember

Facebook group Pantsuit Nation chose her penchant for eschewing

skirts and dresses as the name of their collective, inadvertently directing

public focus to her physical appearance rather than her decades of political

experience.

At every corner, women’s political access hinges on society’s ability to

see them in alignment with the default ideals of women first and then

politicians. But political gatekeeping based on bodies exists beyond the

realm of sex and gender binaries. In workshops, I often ask participants to

consider the thirty-six women who have been governors throughout the

country’s history and to take guesses at what those numbers might be if we

were to break them down by various identities. How many people of color

have been governor? What about the number of openly gay or lesbian

people? How about people with disabilities? Or transgender folks?

Undoubtedly people begin to see how those numbers winnow down to

fewer and fewer diverse bodies being represented in our “representative”

government. But we do not have to guess. The numbers speak for

themselves:

• Twenty-four governors have been people of color. 32

• Six governors have been disabled. 33

• Two governors have been openly gay or lesbian. 34

• Zero have been openly transgender.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!