29.12.2012 Views

4 Final Report - Emits - ESA

4 Final Report - Emits - ESA

4 Final Report - Emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5 <strong>Final</strong><br />

<strong>Report</strong><br />

5 Recommendations on further Analysis<br />

5.1 System Analysis<br />

Detailed analysis of the manoeuvre times<br />

A driving aspect of the mission performance is the manoeuvre time of the system to point from on<br />

observation pattern to the next. Depending on the configuration of the AOCS, the limiting factor is the<br />

settling time to achieve the desired level of stability after the active part of the manoeuvre. It has been<br />

identified that especially the characteristics of the solar array are of relevance for the settling time.<br />

It is highly recommended to analyse the manoeuvre times in more detail, especially concerning the<br />

characteristics of large structures as the solar array, in order to consolidate this important aspect of<br />

mission performance at a high level of confidence.<br />

Detailed investigation of microvibration aspects<br />

At the required level of attitude stability, the microvibrations from momentum wheels, solar array drive<br />

and, if applicable, of an antenna pointing mechanism have to be minimized and/or compensated. A<br />

detailed analysis of the microvibrations and the means of reductions is highly recommended for the<br />

further study phases.<br />

5.2 Mission Objectives and Data Processing<br />

At least two major issues remain at this stage of the GEO study. First the need to strongly consolidate<br />

the user’s requirement, second the temporal coverage specificity of the GEO (compute the optimal<br />

revisit frequency to get one clear image per days, based on the Eumetsat cloud products archive and<br />

taking into account ocean colour geometrical limitations).<br />

Additional proposed tasks:<br />

• Justification of the GEO concept for OC. A less demanding requirement on the temporal<br />

coverage is to be able to detect the daily oceanic structures (like Chlorophyll gradient).<br />

Contrary to purely numerical techniques of “optimal interpolation” trying to fill the gap of LEO,<br />

the GEO concept could directly supply the physical data in a progressive way among the<br />

day. It is proposed to analyse the progressive detection of Chlorophyll structure (i.e.<br />

progressive improvement of the gradient computation with increasing clear zones along the<br />

day), as a function of the number of acquisitions, and to derive the minimal revisit<br />

requirement which suits current operational services in structure detection.<br />

• Air mass issue and atmospheric correction. There is a big need to have a radiative<br />

transfer modeling tool in spherical coordinates, in order to access the realistic air mass<br />

requirements. To our knowledge such a code is not available to the Ocean Colour<br />

community in Europe and could be developed.<br />

• Coverage analysis The user requirement on temporal coverage refers to two main aspects:<br />

− need to have several images per day in order to built one daily cloud-free synthesis (e.g.<br />

phytoplancton map)<br />

− need to have several clear images per day in order to follow rapid events (e.g. tides, NRT<br />

water quality monitoring).<br />

The analysis conducted so far on "availability coverage" used a very high revisit time (15<br />

min) and is thus not exactly scaled to the requirements and potential of Geo-Oculus (agility<br />

for pointing on cloud-free region). An acquisition scenario that would optimise the cloud-free<br />

region, taking into account the realistic duration of acquisition, pointing and stabilization<br />

Doc. No: GOC-ASG-RP-002 Page 5-87<br />

Issue: 2<br />

Date: 13.05.2009 Astrium GmbH

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!