4 Final Report - Emits - ESA
4 Final Report - Emits - ESA
4 Final Report - Emits - ESA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3 <strong>Final</strong><br />
<strong>Report</strong><br />
Manoeuvre Times and Image Acquisition Times<br />
The manoeuvre times can be separated into two contributors:<br />
• Actual manoeuvre time;<br />
• S/A tranquillisation time.<br />
The actual manoeuvre time depends on the size of manoeuvre, chosen technology (wheel size, etc.)<br />
and manoeuvre strategy.<br />
The S/A tranquillisation time depends mostly on the pointing drift required for the image acquisition<br />
(the more challenging the requirement, the longer the tranquillisation time). An allocation of 70<br />
seconds per manoeuvre has been considered.<br />
3.4 Cloud Coverage Analysis<br />
Two of the key features of Geo-Oculus, the possibility for real-time commanding and the capability for<br />
short revisit cycles have been found to give an essential asset in order to maximise the mission<br />
performance - the optimisation of mission planning for cloud cover. The intention of this analysis has<br />
been to identify the potential of Geo-Oculus that can be gained, to validate the system requirements,<br />
to identify a possible optimisation strategy and to assess the performance compared to reference<br />
missions.<br />
Due to its geostationary orbit, Geo-Oculus has the capability to access every spot within its footprint at<br />
the time the spot becomes cloud free. Considering the applied FOV and the possible agility of the<br />
system, this capability confined. In result only a certain image acquisition frequency is achieved;<br />
hence a selection of the images is required. This leads to the point that the system will have to apply a<br />
permanently updated optimisation of the mission planning, to gain maximum possible ground<br />
coverage. This optimisation should take into account the current cloud cover situation, possibly<br />
supplied by MTG and Metop, the changing illumination conditions throughout the entire day, nowcasting<br />
and short range forecasting information on the expected cloud cover situation and the<br />
constraints placed by the on-demand missions.<br />
In the analysis described in here, a simplified optimisation strategy and mission planning have been<br />
used, considered to represent a realistic approach. This strategy accounts for the illumination<br />
conditions and maximises the achieved ground coverage.<br />
The entire cloud coverage analysis is based on cloud mask data from MSG with a revisit time of 15<br />
min. The time span, considered in this analysis range from 01/2004 to 05/2007. In a preliminary low<br />
level analysis representative days for a detailed evaluation of the cloud coverage are filtered out of the<br />
complete dataset. To gain representative results from the analysis, representative days are indicated<br />
by analysing every day concerning:<br />
• Cloud amount<br />
• Cloud coverage changes<br />
• Time of sufficient illumination conditions<br />
By comparing the values of each day with the mean value of the whole data set, several days for<br />
detailed analyses have been indicated.<br />
Page 3-22 Doc. No: GOC-ASG-RP-002<br />
Issue: 2<br />
Astrium GmbH Date: 13.05.2009