29.12.2012 Views

4 Final Report - Emits - ESA

4 Final Report - Emits - ESA

4 Final Report - Emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 <strong>Final</strong><br />

<strong>Report</strong><br />

Manoeuvre Times and Image Acquisition Times<br />

The manoeuvre times can be separated into two contributors:<br />

• Actual manoeuvre time;<br />

• S/A tranquillisation time.<br />

The actual manoeuvre time depends on the size of manoeuvre, chosen technology (wheel size, etc.)<br />

and manoeuvre strategy.<br />

The S/A tranquillisation time depends mostly on the pointing drift required for the image acquisition<br />

(the more challenging the requirement, the longer the tranquillisation time). An allocation of 70<br />

seconds per manoeuvre has been considered.<br />

3.4 Cloud Coverage Analysis<br />

Two of the key features of Geo-Oculus, the possibility for real-time commanding and the capability for<br />

short revisit cycles have been found to give an essential asset in order to maximise the mission<br />

performance - the optimisation of mission planning for cloud cover. The intention of this analysis has<br />

been to identify the potential of Geo-Oculus that can be gained, to validate the system requirements,<br />

to identify a possible optimisation strategy and to assess the performance compared to reference<br />

missions.<br />

Due to its geostationary orbit, Geo-Oculus has the capability to access every spot within its footprint at<br />

the time the spot becomes cloud free. Considering the applied FOV and the possible agility of the<br />

system, this capability confined. In result only a certain image acquisition frequency is achieved;<br />

hence a selection of the images is required. This leads to the point that the system will have to apply a<br />

permanently updated optimisation of the mission planning, to gain maximum possible ground<br />

coverage. This optimisation should take into account the current cloud cover situation, possibly<br />

supplied by MTG and Metop, the changing illumination conditions throughout the entire day, nowcasting<br />

and short range forecasting information on the expected cloud cover situation and the<br />

constraints placed by the on-demand missions.<br />

In the analysis described in here, a simplified optimisation strategy and mission planning have been<br />

used, considered to represent a realistic approach. This strategy accounts for the illumination<br />

conditions and maximises the achieved ground coverage.<br />

The entire cloud coverage analysis is based on cloud mask data from MSG with a revisit time of 15<br />

min. The time span, considered in this analysis range from 01/2004 to 05/2007. In a preliminary low<br />

level analysis representative days for a detailed evaluation of the cloud coverage are filtered out of the<br />

complete dataset. To gain representative results from the analysis, representative days are indicated<br />

by analysing every day concerning:<br />

• Cloud amount<br />

• Cloud coverage changes<br />

• Time of sufficient illumination conditions<br />

By comparing the values of each day with the mean value of the whole data set, several days for<br />

detailed analyses have been indicated.<br />

Page 3-22 Doc. No: GOC-ASG-RP-002<br />

Issue: 2<br />

Astrium GmbH Date: 13.05.2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!