briefing papers for policy makers
briefing papers for policy makers
briefing papers for policy makers
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Key Publications<br />
A special issue on visual language in science education with STTIS results has already been accepted <strong>for</strong> publication in the<br />
International Journal of Science Education Vol 24, nº 3. The special issue includes six <strong>papers</strong>:<br />
Ametller & Pintó, Students’ reading of innovative images of energy at secondary school level<br />
Colin, Chauvet & Viennot, Reading images in optics: students’ difficulties, and teachers’ views.<br />
Pintó, R., The Science Teachers Training in an In<strong>for</strong>mation Society Project.<br />
Pintó & Ametller, Students’ Difficulties in Reading Images: Comparing Results from Four National Research Groups.<br />
Stylianidou, Omerod & Ogborn, Analysis of Science Textbook Pictures about ‘Energy’ And Pupils’ Reading Of Them.<br />
Testa, Monroy & Sassi, Students’ reading Images in Kinematics: The Case Of Real-Time Graphs.<br />
Results of the project have been also published in:<br />
Komorek, Behrendt, Dahncke, Duit, Gräber & Kross (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference of the European<br />
Science Education Research Association (E.S.E.R.A.). Research in Science Education. Past, Present, and Future, (Kiel,<br />
Germany), 31 August-4 September 1999.<br />
Pints & Suriñach (eds), International Conference Physics Teacher Education Beyond 2000. Selected Contributions, Elsevier<br />
Editions, ISBN. 2-84299-312-8, (Paris), 2001.<br />
Pints & Suriñach (eds), Proceedings of the International Conference Physics Teacher Education Beyond 2000 CD Production<br />
Calidos, ISBN: 84-699-4416-9, (Barcelona), 2001.<br />
Research reports:<br />
Balzano, Giberti, Monroy & Sassi, Trans<strong>for</strong>mations done by teachers when using an IT: the case of MBL (micro computer based<br />
laboratory), NR1.2-IT, 1999.<br />
Chauvet, Colin & Viennot, Reading images in optics- Students difficulties, teachersí views and practice. NR2-FR, 1999.<br />
Chauvet, Hirn, & Viennot, Investigation on teacher trans<strong>for</strong>mations when implementing teaching strategies, FR NR3, 1999.<br />
Contini, Ott & Sassi, The State of the Art in the Use/Value of In<strong>for</strong>maticTools, NR1.1 –IT, 1999.<br />
Monroy, Testa, Giberti, & Sassi, Trans<strong>for</strong>mation of didactic intentions: The Italian case of ìmotion and <strong>for</strong>ce proposal, NR3-IT,<br />
1999.<br />
Pinto & Ametller, Using images to teach Energy: students' difficulties, teachers' interpretations and teachers' trans<strong>for</strong>mations,<br />
NR2-SP, 2000.<br />
Pinto, Ametller, Chauvet, Colin, Giberti, Monroy, Ogborn, Ormerod, Sassi, Stylianidou, Testa &. Viennot, Investigation on the<br />
difficulties in teaching and learning graphic representations and on their use in science classrooms, RW2. STTIS Project, 2000.<br />
Pinto, Gutierrez, Ametller, Andresen, Balzano, Boohan, Chauvet, Colin, Couso, Giberti, Hirn, Kolsto, Monroy, Ogborn, Quale,<br />
Rebmann, Sassi, Stylianidou, Testa, Viennot, Teachers Implementing Innovations: Trans<strong>for</strong>mations Trends, RW4, 2001.<br />
Pinto, Ametller, Boohan, Chauvet, Giberti, Gutierrez, Monroy, Ogborn, Ormerod, Quale, Sassi, Stylianidou, Testa, Viennot,,<br />
Dissemination activities. Presentation of the STTIS results at the International Conference Physics Teacher Education Beyond<br />
2000, RW6, 2000.<br />
Pinto, Perez & Gutierrez, The State of Art in the Use and Value of In<strong>for</strong>matic Tools - The Spanish case. NR1.1-SP, 1999.<br />
Pinto, Perez & Gutierrez, Implementing MBL (Microcomputer Based Laboratory) technology <strong>for</strong> the laboratory work in<br />
Compulsory Secondary school Science classes, NR1.2-SP, 1999.<br />
Pinto & Gomez, Teaching about energy in Spanish secondary schools: teachers trans<strong>for</strong>mations of innovations, NR3-SP, 1999.<br />
Quale, Andresen & Kolst, The State of Art in the Use and Value of In<strong>for</strong>matic Tools. The Norwegian case, NR1.1-NO, 1999.<br />
Quale, Andresen & Kolst, Using IT-tools in the teaching of physics in Norwegian secondary schools: intentions, expectations and<br />
practice, NR1.2-NO, 1999.<br />
Rebmann, G., The State of Art in the Use and Value of In<strong>for</strong>matic Tools. The French case, NR1.1-FR, 1999.<br />
Rebmann, G., Investigation of actual use of in<strong>for</strong>matic tools by science teachers: the French case, NR1.2-FR, 1999.<br />
Sassi, Monroy, Testa & Giberti, Reading and interpreting graphs from real-time experiments: students difficulties, teachers<br />
interpretations and class practice, NR2-IT, 2000.<br />
Sassi, Monroy, Testa, Ametller, Andresen. Balzano, Boohan., Chauvet, Colin, Couso, Giberti, Gutierrez., Hirn-Chaine, Ogborn,<br />
Pintó, Quale, Rebmann, Stylianidou, Viennot, Teacher training materials favouring the take-up of innovations, RW5, 2000.<br />
110