29.01.2013 Views

Project Cycle Management Training Handbook - CFCU

Project Cycle Management Training Handbook - CFCU

Project Cycle Management Training Handbook - CFCU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Project</strong> <strong>Cycle</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong><br />

7.3.2 Activities<br />

Actual schedule and completion compared with plan. Were there<br />

delays or time savings? Which organisation was responsible for<br />

delays? What effect did deviations from plan have on the project?<br />

These data will have been monitored and reported in progress reports.<br />

Figure 33: Linking Indicators to the Logframe<br />

Indicators & the logframe<br />

Level of logframe Type of information Timing of collection Measurement concept<br />

Overall Objectives Substantive development change specific to the sector.<br />

Measurements based on trends, possibly of key sectoral indicators<br />

NOTE: the project is only one of many factors influencing change<br />

<strong>Project</strong> Purpose Realistic & sustainable change in target group situation, specific to<br />

project intervention<br />

Beneficiary<br />

response<br />

Early warning of likelihood of implementation success from opinions<br />

of beneficiaries about their access to, use of, and degree of<br />

satisfaction with services provided by the project<br />

Results Quantitative and qualitative measures of physical progress in service<br />

delivery<br />

Cost ratios and input output ratios of performance<br />

Comparisons of actual achievements with planned targets<br />

Activities Measures based on activity schedule<br />

Comparisons of actual start and completion dates with planned dates<br />

Variations from the planned schedule<br />

Milestone dates and events<br />

Costs Measures based on project budget<br />

Comparisons of actual against plan<br />

Analysis of government, donor and beneficiary contributions<br />

Cost variance analysis<br />

7.3.3 Results<br />

<strong>Project</strong> completion &<br />

ex-post<br />

Mid-term & project<br />

completion<br />

Quarterly/yearly<br />

[Collected as part of<br />

results-monitoring.]<br />

SUSTAINABILITY<br />

‘Continuing the flow of benefits.’<br />

IMPACT<br />

‘Making a difference<br />

in the wider environment.’<br />

RELEVANCE<br />

‘Meeting target group needs.’<br />

LEADING INDICATORS<br />

Proxies for relevant and sustainable<br />

change<br />

Quarterly/yearly EFFECTIVENESS<br />

‘Progress towards objectives<br />

- doing the right things.’<br />

EFFICIENCY<br />

‘Efficient implementation<br />

- doing things right.’<br />

Weekly/Monthly<br />

Weekly/Monthly<br />

ECONOMY<br />

‘Ensuring the best relationship between<br />

cost, quality & time.’<br />

Indicators of how activities were transformed into results and<br />

services. Many of these indicators will be process indicators that<br />

report successful completion of a task – eg. Business Centre<br />

established and equipped. Others will be quantified targets such as<br />

number of managers trained in market analysis. A third level is<br />

concerned with the efficiency of project activities.<br />

Efficiency indicators compare actual inputs as a ratio of actual<br />

outputs: e.g. average cost of training per participant; number of SMEs<br />

being advised per Business Adviser per month; percentage of<br />

retrained public sector workers finding jobs in the private sector. Most<br />

of these data will be obtainable from project records and will have<br />

been reported in progress reports. Calculation of these ratios will<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!