29.01.2013 Views

Splintered Lives - Barnardo's

Splintered Lives - Barnardo's

Splintered Lives - Barnardo's

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PAGE 54<br />

chapter<br />

8<br />

Finkelhor argues that the particular conjunction of these dynamics makes "the trauma<br />

of sexual abuse unique, different from other childhood traumas" (1988, p.180), and that the<br />

short and long term effects are strongest where individuals are abused by a family<br />

member and the abuse is repeated. Inferring from this, it will therefore be harder and<br />

more threatening to tell about repeated abuse by a family member, and also harder to<br />

tell of repeated abuse but where there is an apparent element of 'choice', as in the case<br />

of prostitution. Where silence has been either enforced or chosen as a way of coping,<br />

beginning to speak about victimization usually emerges in response to a change of<br />

context, circumstance, concern or understanding. Remembering and believing oneself<br />

is painful enough, trusting others with that knowledge may not only accentuate the pain<br />

but also open up the dangers of not being believed or made to feel responsible: the<br />

danger of another layer of stigmatisation, betrayal, powerlessness and enforced silence<br />

being added. Researchers and clinicians have referred to these responses as<br />

"secondary abuse" or "secondary victimization" (Faller, 1990).<br />

The reasons why children and adults feel unable to speak about abuse until many years<br />

later, and which account for the interrupted and inconsistent process once they do begin to,<br />

are complex. For each survivor the precise etiology of this process will be different, but<br />

nonetheless informed by their specific experiences of abuse, how they made sense of it at<br />

the time and later, and the social contexts which either facilitated or prevented disclosure.<br />

Donald Nathenson (1989) explores the concept of shame in relation to sexual abuse:<br />

that exposure of "some particularly intimate, sensitive and vulnerable aspect of the<br />

self" (p381) can be very threatening, creating an impulse to hide that which might be<br />

'shameful'. Fear of being viewed as 'shamed' can interfere with connectedness to<br />

others; literally not wanting to be seen/known by them. It is this anticipation of the<br />

judgement of others which makes speaking about sexual abuse so threatening. Using<br />

this as a framework, but extending it to situations involving sexual exploitation the<br />

following possibilities emerge:<br />

Child pornography<br />

�� an awareness that others will be able to see their humiliation without the<br />

child/young person knowing;<br />

�� that what for them was humiliating and shameful is sold/made available as a<br />

source of enjoyment for others;<br />

�� that what they have done under coercion, and/or as a survival strategy will be<br />

seen as at least complicity, and at worst enjoyment.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!