30.01.2013 Views

The 2nd HPD report - Health Policy Monitor

The 2nd HPD report - Health Policy Monitor

The 2nd HPD report - Health Policy Monitor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eimbursement rate is 35 percent. Most drugs belong to this<br />

category.<br />

– <strong>The</strong> remainder, drugs with an insufficient SMR, is not<br />

reimbursed; the patient or the patient’s supplemental insurance<br />

pays the full cost.<br />

<strong>The</strong> “Commission de Transparence,” a commission of physicians,<br />

pharmacists, members of the health insurance association<br />

and representatives from the pharmaceutical industry, issues<br />

recommendations based on this classification. Between 1999 and<br />

2001, the commission evaluated all of the 4,200 listed pharmaceuticals<br />

with respect to each possible indication. Based on its<br />

findings, the commission recommended reducing the reimbursement<br />

for 840 drugs from 65 percent to 35 percent and excluding<br />

another 835 drugs from the list of reimbursable drugs<br />

altogether. Until 2003, however, only a few drugs were actually<br />

delisted or moved to a lower reimbursement category.<br />

In April 2003, the MoH implemented a new system, reducing<br />

the reimbursement rates for 617 drugs. Pharmaceutical companies<br />

raised an outcry, criticizing the criteria for reimbursement<br />

and reevaluation of the drugs and accusing the “Commission de<br />

Transparence” of inconsistency. Taking their case to court, on the<br />

grounds of breach of procedural rules and insufficient justification<br />

for reducing the rate, some of the affected companies won<br />

rulings that reversed the decreased reimbursement for 12 drugs.<br />

Some scientists criticize the SMR criteria as too narrow in<br />

scope. <strong>The</strong>y argue that the criteria should consider not just efficacy,<br />

but also benefit-risk-ratios, social dimensions and equity<br />

aspects. Furthermore they argue that the consequences of this<br />

policy have not been evaluated.<br />

In response to these criticisms, the MoH decided to implement<br />

the delisting in three waves spread out over three years. In<br />

the first wave, 84 drugs were delisted in summer 2003. <strong>The</strong> MoH<br />

also reorganized the “Commission de Transparence” in September<br />

2003, changing the composition of its membership.<br />

51<br />

Evaluations to<br />

little effect<br />

Drug companies<br />

fight further<br />

reimbursement cuts<br />

Delisting criteria<br />

lack equity<br />

dimension<br />

MoH speeds<br />

up delisting in<br />

response to critics

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!