30.01.2013 Views

The 2nd HPD report - Health Policy Monitor

The 2nd HPD report - Health Policy Monitor

The 2nd HPD report - Health Policy Monitor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

From 1994 to 2003, prices for all pharmaceuticals were negotiated<br />

between the manufacturers’ LEEM (Les Entreprises de<br />

Médicament) and the CEPS (Comité économique des produits de<br />

santé), the economic committee on health products. Negotiations<br />

were based on a medical assessment of the drug (by the “Commission<br />

de Transparence” according to the six-tiered ASMR system)<br />

and on expected sales, research and marketing costs as well<br />

as available funds.<br />

Idea<br />

Pilot<br />

<strong>Policy</strong> Paper<br />

Legislation<br />

Adoption<br />

Evaluation<br />

Change<br />

<strong>The</strong> bill on liberalization of prices sought to exclude from this<br />

negotiation process those pharmaceuticals demonstrated to have<br />

a major added medical value. <strong>The</strong>se drugs were to be defined by<br />

ministerial order according to the ASMR determined by the<br />

“Commission de Transparence.” After intensive industry lobbying,<br />

the definition of the drugs in question was made part of the<br />

negotiations between CEPS and LEEM. CEPS merely retains the<br />

right to veto the price in the weeks after the drug is introduced to<br />

the market.<br />

<strong>The</strong> only independent journal on pharmaceuticals in France,<br />

“Prescrire,” has accused the “Commission de Transparence” of<br />

inconsistent decisions. Furthermore, the French Court of Account<br />

strongly criticized the negotiation process for lack of transparency<br />

and inability to regulate the pharmaceutical market. CEPS was<br />

suspected of favoring industry goals over health policy goals.<br />

As a result of the reform on liberalization of prices for innovative<br />

drugs, pharmaceutical companies can define prices for new<br />

innovative drugs without negotiation through public institutions.<br />

Such a policy is completely new to France. <strong>The</strong> primary aim was<br />

to advance the development and market entry of innovative medications<br />

and to accelerate patients’ access to such drugs. Whether<br />

this policy will effectively promote the development of innovative<br />

products and speed access to these drugs remains to be seen.<br />

53<br />

New products<br />

excluded from<br />

price negotiations<br />

Intransparent negotiation<br />

process<br />

New product<br />

prices no longer<br />

negotiated

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!